Has anyone else noticed this new and disturbing trend in online advertising? I call it "forced speed-reading".
This seems a very new technique - I've first noticed it only within the past month. But perhaps that's just because it's just landed big-time in mainstream online news media. Specifically, it's invaded my morning read of CNN and Huffington Post using each outlet's iOS apps.
You are reading a news article. Perhaps you are distracted for a bit (I tend to read morning news while also watching a local "morning show" on TV). Or you simply want to take your time to read carefully, or study a chart or graphic, etc.
And then it happens - the unwanted and unasked-for full-page popup ad. You close the ad and continue reading. And .... boom! There it is again!
I honestly can't tell you if it is typically the same ad again or a different one. I find this so offensive and disturbing that I just by reflex close it immediately. I wonder how effective these ads really are? Who would NOT be offended? This is a case where I HOPE I am subconsciously absorbing something from these ads that are seemingly completely unmemorable to me. My hope is that that I AM remembering the name of the company or product, and will avoid it in the future!
So, now, we are forced to speed-read news articles, and/or just skim the first couple of paragraphs.
This is disturbing beyond simple annoyance. I worry about how such intrusive techniques will affect our ability to learn and absorb information. It is particularly disturbing because it suggests that (at least some of) mainstream media now seem to clearly and transparently value delivering an advertising message above delivering news.
Have you noticed this yourself? If so, where? When did you first notice it?
What can we do to halt this trend? I think there's one thing we can do, and that is to bring it to the attention of
Apple and urge them to ban the practice. This doesn't seem a very "Apple-like" behavior, and Apple could update their rules for apps to ban this technique. Maybe this has been happening on websites for some time - I wouldn't have noticed because I get most/all of my written news from iPad apps.
While Apple doesn't control the web, they DO control the App Store. Apple could elevate themselves by putting their foot down.
I suspect that some sharp lawyers noticed a gaping hole in the App Store agreement (maybe a recent change in rules that had an unintended effect?), and/or media execs decided to just beg forgiveness rather than ask permission. I wonder how long it will take for Apple to notice and change the rules?
In any case, PLEASE make your opinion known, if this disturbs you as it does me! Please write Apple and indicate your disapproval and ask that Apple disallow this within iOS apps.
P.S. I realize this discussion is likely to eventually drift into PIR. But let's see if we can keep it here at least for a bit to give the issue broader exposure. I'm particularly interested in discovering how wide-spread this is, if I am correct in my assessment that this is a "new thing", any links to observations/analysis as those who follow and analyze media itself surely must have noticed?
This seems a very new technique - I've first noticed it only within the past month. But perhaps that's just because it's just landed big-time in mainstream online news media. Specifically, it's invaded my morning read of CNN and Huffington Post using each outlet's iOS apps.
You are reading a news article. Perhaps you are distracted for a bit (I tend to read morning news while also watching a local "morning show" on TV). Or you simply want to take your time to read carefully, or study a chart or graphic, etc.
And then it happens - the unwanted and unasked-for full-page popup ad. You close the ad and continue reading. And .... boom! There it is again!
I honestly can't tell you if it is typically the same ad again or a different one. I find this so offensive and disturbing that I just by reflex close it immediately. I wonder how effective these ads really are? Who would NOT be offended? This is a case where I HOPE I am subconsciously absorbing something from these ads that are seemingly completely unmemorable to me. My hope is that that I AM remembering the name of the company or product, and will avoid it in the future!
So, now, we are forced to speed-read news articles, and/or just skim the first couple of paragraphs.
This is disturbing beyond simple annoyance. I worry about how such intrusive techniques will affect our ability to learn and absorb information. It is particularly disturbing because it suggests that (at least some of) mainstream media now seem to clearly and transparently value delivering an advertising message above delivering news.
Have you noticed this yourself? If so, where? When did you first notice it?
What can we do to halt this trend? I think there's one thing we can do, and that is to bring it to the attention of
Apple and urge them to ban the practice. This doesn't seem a very "Apple-like" behavior, and Apple could update their rules for apps to ban this technique. Maybe this has been happening on websites for some time - I wouldn't have noticed because I get most/all of my written news from iPad apps.
While Apple doesn't control the web, they DO control the App Store. Apple could elevate themselves by putting their foot down.
I suspect that some sharp lawyers noticed a gaping hole in the App Store agreement (maybe a recent change in rules that had an unintended effect?), and/or media execs decided to just beg forgiveness rather than ask permission. I wonder how long it will take for Apple to notice and change the rules?
In any case, PLEASE make your opinion known, if this disturbs you as it does me! Please write Apple and indicate your disapproval and ask that Apple disallow this within iOS apps.
P.S. I realize this discussion is likely to eventually drift into PIR. But let's see if we can keep it here at least for a bit to give the issue broader exposure. I'm particularly interested in discovering how wide-spread this is, if I am correct in my assessment that this is a "new thing", any links to observations/analysis as those who follow and analyze media itself surely must have noticed?