Reviewers are calling it a masterpiece https://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/red-dead-redemption-2/critic-reviews
Wow some of those comments are so over the topAnd anyone who calls it otherwise is getting harassed and threatened.
Wow some of those comments are so over the top
Albeit, I have not had the opportunity to play it yet
“Take-Two takes security seriously and will take legal action against people or publications who leak confidential information. Because this situation involved information about Red Dead Redemption 2, Rockstar Games directed the settlement funds to these three great charities: the American Indian College Fund, the American Prairie Reserve, and the First Nations Development Institute.”
Doesn't seem unreasonable to me.
It doesn’t seem unreasonable to you for a media company to only be allowed to share what games industry wants them to? So yo think Games Media is just an arm of the Games Industry Marketing?
That is not at all what I said, and I will not engage in a discussion with you if open it with falsely attributing such hyperbolic statements to me.
Then what thing they did seems reasonable to you? Let’s start there, so I don’t falsely attribute things to you.
I think companies have a right to declare what information is confidential. And they have a right to decide what information about a game that is still in development gets released to the public. And if media organizations decide to leak confidential information, they should expect to see consequences.
I disagree a thousand percent. The media organization did nothing illegal to get the data, and publishing information is their job. If the company in question gets to decide what can and cannot be shared, the media company becomes nothing more than a mouthpiece for the company. That’s not journalism.
Do you also strongly disagree with review embargos?
Do you not believe in the concept of confidential information and documents?
What about software companies that get advance info on the next Playstation abd XBox hardware? Do Sony and MS not have a right to ask for this information to be kept under wraps until their official announcement?
Asked? Sure, they can ask whatever they want. Threaten legal action and extort a million pounds isn’t asking. What if Apple threatened MacRumors with a lawsuit because they got confidential information?
That’s my issue. It isn’t that they’re mad about things. It’s about what they did with that anger, which will have a chilling effect on people going forward into the future.
Also, the review embargo thing works in favor of the reviewer, giving them time to actually do the review properly.