Not sure how I feel about this
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/07/n...aad330de&ex=1338868800&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/07/n...aad330de&ex=1338868800&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
What about the fact that some of the games he plays are rated Mature (17+)
Article says that the parental controls are "on"...
Unless the parental controls change the game from shooting someone to handing out flowers, that doesn't mean a whole lot.
Article says that the parental controls are "on"...
I believe that's for when he plays online with other people, he won't hear stupid asses yelling out racials slurs in ignorant manners for no reason.
I don't see anything wrong with playing videogames like that. I know I was like that at his age too (no tournies, but addicted). I probably started as soon as I could pick up a controller. Sure NES didn't have realistic grpahics like the 360, but how realistic can a game like halo be? The parent discussed the difference between reality and fiction. He's 9 now, and the fact that he's still alive with no major limbs missing, he hasn't tried to imitate crazy game moves to the extreme.
He's just a kid doin' what he likes, and he's damn good at it. This whole discerning reality and fiction in kids seems like an overblown topic. As far back as my memory goes, I don't think I've ever thought reality was coming through a screen, movie, tv or videogames. Same thing goes for my brother, and all my cousins. That's just my thought. I think it has to do with the computer age that we've grown up in, we've been constantly exposed to it, but I dunno, I'm not a psychologist or anything.
I'm sure you weren't trying to generalise there, the majority here don't seem to think violent games make for violent kids...
this story is soooo old
he was on 60 minutes about a year ago