I used to think things were hopeless, and that everyone was just kinda waiting things out until the end. I had no idea how wrong I was.
There are those who are not only keeping hope and culture alive, but they’re actively improving it every single day. If we’re busy scrolling socials and watching the news, we’re not gonna to see it.
I’m a firm believer in the idea of “your focus determines your reality” (Qui Gon Jin), where one pays attention to what they’re paying attention to, to put it simply. There are a thousand things happening around me in each moment, but I only really experience a small few - it’s the same on a larger, life scale, if you make an effort.
Once I stopped watching the news, and started simply staying informed, I started to see a lot of hope and love all around me. Yes, the hate is still there, but I’ve learned to move it to the background of my life - or the periphery, at least.
As I alluded to, I think the same type of argument could be made for reducing social media, which I did over the past good few years. I don’t know think I can consider myself fully out of that world - nor do I advocate for that - but I certainly don’t focus on it as much as I used to.
And all of these shifts in my focus have had major effects on my worldview and mental health. I don’t think I’ve ever bee happier - or more aware of the world around me, in an odd way…
[since I'm not on Reddit anymore, I'm regurgitating this mind junk here, lol]
Based on the rules of this forum, no debate please…
It‘s great for mental health to have a good world view, but I have to ask not in a critical way, are you better off being happy in your little bubble, oblivious to the bad things coming down the pike for the species, because collectively we cause these bad things in our reality, and for many/most(?), when bad news hits, they tend to discount it, minimize it, or call it a hoax, all designed to fool them or make them unhappy.
All the happy feelings may keep you happy, but if you're oblivious, you are just along for the ride, and it’s not until ugly reality sticks its nose in your face, and your security is upended, you will become alarmed, and then it could be too late.
But it could also be so what, in the end, who cares? We all end up dead after our short mortal lifespans. And so what if you kids only make it to 50? They are finished by 100 anyway. In the big picture what difference does it make? The actuality is that we are here, and how about not turning the Earth into a hell hole, which won’t be any fun.
I just realized that I might be making your argument, except we really don’t want to trash the Earth, and knowing about and doing somthing about it is in our best interest, yes? You might have to emerge from a happy bubble to deal with some of this?
Or Live your life as long as you can, do what you can in a happy state, and que sera for the rest. When it’s over, it’s over, but is it… over? I personally believe it is unwise and premature to make any judgments about the end as you think you know it, in a very ignorant state of existence. My opinion, observation, not an attack.
Now at this point, I’ll make a proposal, it starts with the term Earth Simulator. This is not something I’m trying to be funny about, but have conidered seriously. Ecen as a simulator, it’s not in our best interest to trash the Earth, because here is where we are stuck for the time being.
BTW, of which, I know I am real, ie experiencing this reality, but I actually don’t know about the rest of you.
For all I know you could be little AI bots, everyone in my life could be figments designed to keep me entertained for this personal journey, that I don’t even know if signed up for.
Or we, some, or all of us could a bunch of same status “souls” for lack of a better term, experiencing the same reality as just a very small part of a larger journey. If every one ends up dead in the matter of a human lifetime, and that’s it, my opinion, is that there is no purpose or meaning. For a mili-second in the big time line, you were here, and then you are gone back to your normal state of non-existence. But are you
I say unlikely.
When the grey curtain of this world rolls back and all turns to silver green. And then you see it…
“See what, Gandalf?”
White shores and beyond a far green country under a swift sunrise.
So in summary of today’s non-religious sermon:
- You can choose to believe in Earth to Earth, 100 years if that of life, and then I’m done dust. A belief with zero personal purpose for yourself other than some far flung idea about having helped your species live their 100 years too. Big whoop.
- Or you can belief in the religious promotions surrounding you, but the problem there is that those forces tell you, your destiny has been figure out, here are the rules, threats, follow me, give me power, wealth and control and the good pace is yours. Ok, so there is some purpose being pushed there, but it’s usually based on punishment for not adhering to a single specific path.
- A better choice in my opinion, is you can believe in personal purpose that this mortal life is just a small part of a larger voyage, but you are in no position to determine specifics at this point. However, I’m talking real purpose, not dissimilar to what choice 2 offers, but minus the baggage, no threats, no obligation to adopt a particular dogma, the chance to grow, evolve, and have things in your life actually have lasting meaning to you in a much larger picture.
In the end, which is not the end, if choice 1or 2 is picked, we, at least those of us that are real, will benefit from door number 3 regardless. And thinking about the big journey can easily help you get though The Earth Simulator.