Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

boultonn

macrumors regular
Jul 20, 2017
215
312
London
Same, I would consider Air if it had Face ID. Probably will upgrade my A12X 11” to a used M1 when the new ones come out.
FaceID is one of the biggest things keeping me on the Pro and not considering the Air.
If this changed that would be interesting.
 

leifp

macrumors 6502
Feb 8, 2008
342
318
Canada
FaceID is one thing I’d give up in a heartbeat on iPad Pro… and I sure would love if it were more reliable on iPhone (bright sunlight = non-function)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Digitalguy

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
16,417
24,181
Wales, United Kingdom
Nope. If you’re going to buy an iPad you’d be an idiot for not getting the oled one. It’s useless to discus whether it’s worth buying one period. Only you know that. I feel like it’s finally the iPad we’ve been demanding screen wise. If one needs to be the last you’ll ever buy then it’s this one.

Why would someone be an idiot for not buying an OLED iPad? Haven’t we learned from the iPhone? All that fuss about OLED and when we all had it we realised it was a huge load of fuss over nothing. It not like the retina screens are bad anyway and perfectly decent enough for watching content.
 

Rafterman

Contributor
Apr 23, 2010
6,903
8,215
Why would someone be an idiot for not buying an OLED iPad? Haven’t we learned from the iPhone? All that fuss about OLED and when we all had it we realised it was a huge load of fuss over nothing. It not like the retina screens are bad anyway and perfectly decent enough for watching content.

Agree. I'm not a screen-o-file. Jelly, 60hz, blooming. Never bothered by any of it. And OLED just doesn't light my noodle.
 
Last edited:

ademUp

macrumors newbie
May 25, 2020
7
4
So new iPads are imminent.
I am still usinga 2018 iPad Pro which is now a bit long in the tooth and sluggish. It’s time to upgrade. However as a MacBook Pro user , Apple have done nothing in that time to convince me that the iPad Pro can be used as a serious computer nor worth the premium. Therefore when the new models are announced I’ll be opting for an Air.
Anyone else in the same boat, or think otherwise? What are your thoughts?
I’ll be opting for a 12.9” Air. The screen quality isn’t important to me. I like to close my eyes when I’m doing music production to focus my mind on what I’m hearing rather than seeing (it can be a trap). I don’t need all of the power of the Pro, but I do need the screen size, so the 12.9” Air is a bit of a god-send in that regard. The other thing I’ll be using it for is mathematics, so I’m hoping they keep developing that new whiteboard app into a Notability killer (it’s a great program for doing maths on, but there is a subscription fee, and I’m already paying a premium for a 2TB iCloud account). Again, I don’t need the highest screen quality for the maths, as long as I can scribble formula, it’s a great chalk-board replacement IMHO.
 

bscheffel

macrumors 6502
Jul 17, 2008
318
567
This is an interesting proposition. I recently gave my sister my 2021 12.9" iPad Pro and took her 2021 iPad Air. I am planning to upgrade to the new iPad Pro and was curious what it would be like to use an iPad Air and if I could possible save myself some $$ and a new Air instead. After using the iPad Air for a couple months here are the reasons I am sticking with the Pro:
1. I prefer FaceID over the TouchID - I was surprised with how much the touchID irritated me since I was so used to not even thinking about unlocking my Pro with FaceID.
2. The smaller size of the Air made working in email less enjoyable and in general productivity apps felt a little cramped. Watching videos, playing games, etc. the smaller size was no issue. Granted I think this excuse will go away with a 12.9" Air coming this year.
3. Sure the Air the lighter and smaller and more convenient to use on a plane, coffee shop, etc. but never once did I take the Air to a place I would not take my Pro due to size/weight.
4. The screen on the Air just doesn't get as bright as the Pro screen. Most of the time this isn't important though to get the same level of brightness I had to turn up the brightness on the Air more impacting battery life. Outside though it's a bigger issue.
5. Promotion and Mini-LED were not a factor for me. If I concentrated on it, sure I could tell a difference in scrolling but real world everyday use both screens look fantastic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StoneJack

snipr125

macrumors 68000
Oct 17, 2015
1,797
2,834
UK
Why would someone be an idiot for not buying an OLED iPad? Haven’t we learned from the iPhone? All that fuss about OLED and when we all had it we realised it was a huge load of fuss over nothing. It not like the retina screens are bad anyway and perfectly decent enough for watching content.
Honestly i cant see myself buying another iPad for many years (possibly even a decade) since i brought my day 1 iPad Air 4. Just no real point to upgrade as you cant really use the power of the M chips on iPads compared to Macs. Only near future iPad i would consider is the iPad Mini 7.
 

darngooddesign

macrumors P6
Jul 4, 2007
18,009
9,604
Atlanta, GA
No. I use my iPad for photo editing in Lightroom and 256GB isn’t enough space for me. I really like the Mini LED screen so I wouldn’t downgrade to the Air’s regular screen. I’m spoilt by my 16” MBP’s speakers so I find the Pro’s speakers to be lacking bass-wise; I almost always use a BT speaker with my iPP.
 

aakshey

macrumors 68030
Jun 13, 2016
2,806
1,301
I really don’t think the new iPad Pros will be unnecessarily more expensive

It is highly likely the base storage would move up to 256 GB, that, along with the OLED display would lead to a certain modest hike. For those who anyway buy the 12.9 that’s at least 256 GB or more, the price difference would be minimal or none

Here‘s what I feel the pricing for base iPad Pros would be like for Wifi variants that are OLED and 256 GB

11” - USD 1200+-100 exclusive of taxes (will definitely cost at least 999 and I really doubt it would cost over 1399, though I’m quite confident it will end up being 1200+-100)

12.9” - USD 1400+-100 exclusive of taxes

Currently there’s a 300 buck price difference between the two sizes, that’s because the 11” inch uses a much cheaper lower grade display, since both would be OLED, the difference would come down to 150+-50 bucks

Since the base itself is likely to be 256 GB for many people that would be enough

I don’t see a problem if the above is true

I do understand it’s an extremely expensive device with limited use cases, but given the technology, experience offered and history of previous devices and price points, Apple isn’t really increasing the pricing much nor unnecessarily

Pls refer to this page once the iPad Pros get released or their price announced
 

RickTaylor

macrumors 6502a
Nov 9, 2013
802
315
When it comes time to replace my 2018 12.9" iPad Pro, there's a good chance I'll select the 12.9" Air (if it is released at that time). Having a 12.9" screen is important to me, but I don't care about the other expensive iPad Pro features. Of course I can't be certain; Apple might surprise me. For example, I'd be very tempted by an iPad with a less slippery pencil, that was easier to write neatly with.
 

Shanghaichica

macrumors G5
Apr 8, 2013
14,642
13,143
UK
Why would someone be an idiot for not buying an OLED iPad? Haven’t we learned from the iPhone? All that fuss about OLED and when we all had it we realised it was a huge load of fuss over nothing. It not like the retina screens are bad anyway and perfectly decent enough for watching content.
OLED is nice but I’m not interested in paying more just for OLED. The iPad is already a luxury device. I don’t need it. I have it because I want it. Because it’s a luxury device I have to set price limits so that I can justify it. I’m not paying £1,000 for a luxury device that I’m really using for web browsing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: throAU

throAU

macrumors G3
Feb 13, 2012
8,854
7,011
Perth, Western Australia
So new iPads are imminent.
I am still usinga 2018 iPad Pro which is now a bit long in the tooth and sluggish. It’s time to upgrade. However as a MacBook Pro user , Apple have done nothing in that time to convince me that the iPad Pro can be used as a serious computer nor worth the premium. Therefore when the new models are announced I’ll be opting for an Air.
Anyone else in the same boat, or think otherwise? What are your thoughts?

I did last time around.

I miss the better laminated display of my 2018 Pro on my 2022 Air.

But I really can't stomach the pro cost for what is an entirely secondary / tertiary device for me.

Until or unless they put out an iPad Pro that can actually run macOS things, or give iOS more of the capabilities of macOS, I'll need a MacBook as well. And I'm not spending over. 1000 AUD (including a pencil and keyboard) on a tablet when I also need to supplement it with a MacBook.

There's no hardware reason the iPad Pro can't be more capable. It's just apple trying to maintain two product lines via artificial segmentation. I don't want to be one of those "but Steve would never do this" people, but in this instance, I believe Jobs would have had zero issues enabling the 12.9" iPad Pro to completely supplant the MacBook Air line now they're running M series chips in the higher end iPads. He stated publicly before that apple was not afraid of cannibalising their own products with other products because if they don't someone else will.

Clearly under Tim Cook, this is no longer the case.

The fact that it has not is purely due to apple artificially crippling the iPad lineup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Kim

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
16,417
24,181
Wales, United Kingdom
OLED is nice but I’m not interested in paying more just for OLED. The iPad is already a luxury device. I don’t need it. I have it because I want it. Because it’s a luxury device I have to set price limits so that I can justify it. I’m not paying £1,000 for a luxury device that I’m really using for web browsing.

Yeah it’s one of those things I wouldn’t really notice to be honest. All that fuss was made when OLED first came to the iPhone like it was life changing and now we all have it and realise it was just a slightly better screen. I’ve never watched a YouTube video on my iPad and thought ‘ooh that black bit could be a bit blacker’ lol. I wouldn’t pay extra for it, that’s for sure.

I have an Air now and that’s overkill for watching YouTube and browsing the web. I like how light it is to hold but could get by with an entry level iPad in all honesty. I don’t do any productivity tasks on mine
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Surfsalot

macrumors 65816
Mar 18, 2023
1,399
1,463
I did last time around.

I miss the better laminated display of my 2018 Pro on my 2022 Air.

But I really can't stomach the pro cost for what is an entirely secondary / tertiary device for me.

Until or unless they put out an iPad Pro that can actually run macOS things, or give iOS more of the capabilities of macOS, I'll need a MacBook as well. And I'm not spending over. 1000 AUD (including a pencil and keyboard) on a tablet when I also need to supplement it with a MacBook.

There's no hardware reason the iPad Pro can't be more capable. It's just apple trying to maintain two product lines via artificial segmentation. I don't want to be one of those "but Steve would never do this" people, but in this instance, I believe Jobs would have had zero issues enabling the 12.9" iPad Pro to completely supplant the MacBook Air line now they're running M series chips in the higher end iPads. He stated publicly before that apple was not afraid of cannibalising their own products with other products because if they don't someone else will.

Clearly under Tim Cook, this is no longer the case.

The fact that it has not is purely due to apple artificially crippling the iPad lineup.
You’ll be spending a lot more than $1kAUD
 

AlexESP

macrumors 6502a
Sep 7, 2014
637
1,722
There's no hardware reason the iPad Pro can't be more capable. It's just apple trying to maintain two product lines via artificial segmentation. I don't want to be one of those "but Steve would never do this" people, but in this instance, I believe Jobs would have had zero issues enabling the 12.9" iPad Pro to completely supplant the MacBook Air line now they're running M series chips in the higher end iPads. He stated publicly before that apple was not afraid of cannibalising their own products with other products because if they don't someone else will.

Clearly under Tim Cook, this is no longer the case.

The fact that it has not is purely due to apple artificially crippling the iPad lineup.
I never get the “artificially crippling the iPad”. Making iPadOS unlike MacOS is a decision you might disagree with, but there is no one behind thinking “let’s make the iPad a worse product than it could be”.

I do think that macOS (or more macOS-like features) would make the iPad a worse product. It has nothing to do with cannibalization, I think Apple would sell fewer units overall.

I’d say the iPad has performed much better than the Mac lately. Revenue is similar, but the iPad has received minor updates, while the Mac has gone through a chip and redesign revolution. That is very telling. And since ASP is lower, in terms of units the iPad is much bigger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nj-morris

throAU

macrumors G3
Feb 13, 2012
8,854
7,011
Perth, Western Australia
I never get the “artificially crippling the iPad”. Making iPadOS unlike MacOS is a decision you might disagree with, but there is no one behind thinking “let’s make the iPad a worse product than it could be”.

I do think that macOS (or more macOS-like features) would make the iPad a worse product. It has nothing to do with cannibalization, I think Apple would sell fewer units overall.

Maybe i should clarify.

I don't want iOS to BECOME macOS.

But things like running multiple applications reliably without them being terminated in the background, improved window management, etc. are all things heading in the right direction. Even if the background termination is only disabled when docked on a desk perhaps?

I actually don't care as much as some for things like "omg the filesystem" - but it is capable of running full fledged macOS applications and multitasking with the M1.

Right now the hardware is capable of doing everything i need in a single device, but as it is i am carrying a macbook and ipad around everywhere because of artificial restrictions placed on iOS.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Kim

2Xtreme21

macrumors regular
Nov 25, 2013
152
179
My 2018 11” Pro is one of my most used devices but I really don’t see a pressing need to upgrade it. It’s still relatively performant and the battery holds a decent charge despite it being 5+ years old. OLED might make me cave, but dropping potentially 4 figures to replace a perfectly functional device doesn’t sit well with me.
 

bluedoggiant

macrumors 68030
Jul 13, 2007
2,572
55
MD & ATL,GA
My 2018 11” Pro is one of my most used devices but I really don’t see a pressing need to upgrade it. It’s still relatively performant and the battery holds a decent charge despite it being 5+ years old. OLED might make me cave, but dropping potentially 4 figures to replace a perfectly functional device doesn’t sit well with me.

My 2018 is still great but the 4GB ram and degrading battery life are starting to get noticeable. May upgrade to an M1 iPad for minimal cost and maintain accessory compatibility
 

ssledoux

macrumors 601
Sep 16, 2006
4,254
4,113
Down south
I ditched my pro and went with an Air last year. I had a 12.9 pro and a mini, but got another iMac, so I consolidated my iPads into a 5th gen Air (I had an 11” pro in the past, so I knew I liked the size). I haven’t missed anything except Face ID, but not sure I’m willing to go back pro just for that. I am possibly gonna upgrade my Air depending on the camera layout because I love how it’s situated on the base iPad - makes so much more sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dborja
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.