From a really good review:
http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2328&p=6
I am tempted to get the Mac mini for use on my Dell 2001FP. I had thought about using the spanning hack on my eMac, but I had already tried spanning with my PB, and Expose does get sluggish (not that I use Expose much); so I assume that other aspects would be too (like for PS and InDesign, though I didn't notice it on my PB).
Anyone here with experience with the 1600x1280 resolution on the Mac mini?
BTW the review has some good insight on the video card and what it means to Tiger. Really making me think that a 64mb VRAM is going to be needed to have the best experience under Tiger.
http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2328&p=6
despite what I had originally expected, the on-board Radeon 9200 is a bit of a performance limitation.* I had the Mac mini hooked up to a 23" Cinema Display running its native resolution of 1920 x 1200 and was wondering why Exposé and a handful of other animations were choppy. After tinkering with resolutions, I found out why.* At resolutions above 1280 x 960, the Radeon 9200's 32MB of local frame buffer isn't enough to handle Exposé of even just four windows - swapping to main memory, and thus reducing the smoothness of the Exposé effects.* At 1024 x 768, it's great and it's even fine at 1280 x 960, but once you start going above and beyond that, you start running out of video memory real quickly.* I am concerned about performance under OS X Tiger, simply because with more being stored in video memory (e.g. font caches), you'll run out of video memory even quicker.* Granted, what I'm discussing right now isn't a reduction in actual performance, but rather a reduction in the smoothness of animations - which to a first-time OS X user can be a huge turn off.
I am tempted to get the Mac mini for use on my Dell 2001FP. I had thought about using the spanning hack on my eMac, but I had already tried spanning with my PB, and Expose does get sluggish (not that I use Expose much); so I assume that other aspects would be too (like for PS and InDesign, though I didn't notice it on my PB).
Anyone here with experience with the 1600x1280 resolution on the Mac mini?
BTW the review has some good insight on the video card and what it means to Tiger. Really making me think that a 64mb VRAM is going to be needed to have the best experience under Tiger.