Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

DailySlow

macrumors 6502a
Aug 5, 2015
808
390
NOVA
I wonder how much this will cost the consumer in added Apple product cost ?
Hard to say. Many moving parts- including increased overhead on aluminum processed in a soon-to-be-obsolete way such as carbon taxation, regulations, and if course how the PR about this goes. A big question is can this electricity demanding refining process run on solar, or even wind? Boy that would be cool.
[automerge]1575565072[/automerge]
Aluminium smelting has always used lots of electricity and the majority of it has always been done close to sites of lots of cheap electricity such as nuclear, geothermal and hydroelectric power stations. Production using coal fired power only happens if none of the above are available because it is generally less economic.

Apple has probably always used "carbon free" aluminium since most aluminium has always been made that way.

Welcome as the move is; this is economics being marketed as environmentalism.
Well, not so much if this can function on solar or wind.
 

MadDawg2020

macrumors 6502
Jun 20, 2012
288
289
They is no such thing as carbon free, they will allways be some form of energy requirements that has a carbon footprint what you can go is reduce it as much as possible and that’s what Apple is doing and it’s good it’s the way forward reduce it as much as possible but you will never be able to eliminate it and these daft claims carbon free is just BS PR
What part of "CARBON FREE SMELTING PROCESS" is so difficult for you to understand?! It does not say there is zero carbon footprint involved anywhere in the production line, only the process for smelting the Aluminum. - And yes that is a big deal and will make a difference when you scale that up to industrial scales!
 

Mojohanna32

macrumors regular
Sep 26, 2018
169
365
Aluminium smelting has always used lots of electricity and the majority of it has always been done close to sites of lots of cheap electricity such as nuclear, geothermal and hydroelectric power stations. Production using coal fired power only happens if none of the above are available because it is generally less economic.

Apple has probably always used "carbon free" aluminium since most aluminium has always been made that way.

Welcome as the move is; this is economics being marketed as environmentalism.
THis is not correct per the article. The article states that that traditional smelting is done using a carbon anode and that the byproduct is CO2. The new process uses a ceramic anode and the byproduct is O2. They have also stated the process is less expensive.
So yes, the new SMELTING process is carbon free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mw360

AppleZilla

Suspended
Jul 23, 2010
159
131
Tim Cook will have to let Individual 1 stand next to him and brag that he founded Apple, if he wants to avoid tariffs.
 

BigBoy2018

Suspended
Oct 23, 2018
964
1,822
I'm excited to see what Apple makes with this. Very excited.

Guess: TV shows made of nothing but aluminum

Seriously though, why so excited? They’ll use it to male the same kind of products they already use aluminum for - laptops, ipads, phones, etc
 
Last edited:

mi7chy

macrumors G4
Oct 24, 2014
10,495
11,155
While I'm sure Alcoa will produce some here in the U.S., the joint venture will have production in Canada.

As long as it goes to one of our allies the policies are working to move manufacturing away from China.
 

DanBig

macrumors 6502
Sep 14, 2011
361
471
While this is a good thing! Smelting Iron & Steel use much more energy and create much more CO2 per pound!

Apple needs to help find ways to lower their Carbon footprint too! They still use a lot of steel in the iPhones!
 

ColBatGuano

macrumors member
Dec 29, 2015
57
98
Aluminium smelting has always used lots of electricity and the majority of it has always been done close to sites of lots of cheap electricity such as nuclear, geothermal and hydroelectric power stations. Production using coal fired power only happens if none of the above are available because it is generally less economic.

Apple has probably always used "carbon free" aluminium since most aluminium has always been made that way.

Welcome as the move is; this is economics being marketed as environmentalism.


Depends on how cheap the coal is. In Victoria (Australia) we have had extremely easy to extract (low quality) coal that's provided low cost power for aluminium smelting.
 

TurboDrooler

macrumors member
Nov 19, 2019
41
57
Toronto
I was amazed last year to learn that Apple has a Metallurgy division. It's cool that they're working on problems other than just how to lower costs and increase profits.
 

citysnaps

macrumors G4
Oct 10, 2011
11,894
25,827
I was amazed last year to learn that Apple has a Metallurgy division. It's cool that they're working on problems other than just how to lower costs and increase profits.

Apple's profit margin has decreased every year for the last four years.
 

bluecoast

macrumors 68020
Nov 7, 2017
2,217
2,637
That’s brilliant. Apple with their size can force big changes in the manufacturing supply chain & use their power for good.

With great power comes great responsibility.
 

ksec

macrumors 68020
Dec 23, 2015
2,227
2,585
Alcoa and Rio Tinto aim to commercialize and license the carbon-free smelting process beginning in 2024

Does that it will be exclusive to Apple til 2024?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.