You are saying he is expressing objectionable views in the workplace? I don't see that in the article.Because his voicing of his views is disruptive to the workplace and thus it is not unreasonable to remove him from that workplace.
You are saying he is expressing objectionable views in the workplace? I don't see that in the article.Because his voicing of his views is disruptive to the workplace and thus it is not unreasonable to remove him from that workplace.
A person's right to be a jerk ends when it impacts others. they can be the biggest jerk off of company time, however, Ii a person proves to be toxic in an organization it's certainly the person's coworker's right to complain and ask the company to fix the problem. The company can chose what to do up to firing them.Of course they should. "People" have the freedom to quit and go work at another company, for whatever reason. That's a basic human right. But, why would "people" have the right to determine which other individuals the company hires? Which human right is that?
First of all, putting people in quotes is weird af. Second of all, the company decided to listen to it's employees, and lose one "person", instead of a bunch of people. Why should normals have to find another job? Let the douchebag deal with the consequences of it's actions. Not people.Of course they should. "People" have the freedom to quit and go work at another company, for whatever reason. That's a basic human right. But, why would "people" have the right to determine which other individuals the company hires? Which human right is that?
Nazis were not socialists.. national socialism is extreme love for one's nation. I am an authoritarian fascist myself, but I follow the Italian concept, not Hitlerian.However, in both cases they are used a pejorative terms to attack another group. I doubt right wingers calling people socialists consider it a lot less of a pejorative than Nazi, though oddly enough, the Nazis were socialists.
More to the point: Why do you keep arguing that a person should bear no personal responsibility or consequences for their own action?
Tell to me please, what if employee doesn't want to take the "genocidal poison" ? You know what I mean.. just can't say it here.People do dumb stuff
People often regret doing dumb stuff.
Firing people for dumb stuff they did years ago, whilst not employed with your company is also doing dumb stuff.
People do dumb stuff
People often regret doing dumb stuff.
Firing people for dumb stuff they did years ago, whilst not employed with your company is also doing dumb stuff.
A workplace where everyone is accepted…. As long as your have the same opinions. I wonder how many known republicans or people not on the left are at Apple
This is fake outrage and bullshìt.
By this "logic," any actor who plays a misogynistic character in a movie should never work again.
Not in this case, apparently. There's no difference between a novel and a screenplay as far as punishing the agent of a character is concerned.(Most) People can distinguish acting from someone's real world persona.
The human rights of… lemme guess, a healthy work environment, combined with free speech and this little thing called “power in numbers”? And hey, they didn't even have to unionise.Of course they should. "People" have the freedom to quit and go work at another company, for whatever reason. That's a basic human right. But, why would "people" have the right to determine which other individuals the company hires? Which human right is that?
Good Job Apple! People like that don’t belong to work for a company like Apple.
? ?