Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

kiranmk2

macrumors 68000
Oct 4, 2008
1,539
1,998
For some reason, despite iPhone 7 Plus being perfectly able to run iOS 16, Apple had decided to end support for the 7. Doesn't really make sense when the iPhone 6s got one more update and the 7+ has 3GB of Ram and Most A10 (and A9 for crying out loud) iPad's are still supported on iPadOS16. Any reason why they ended support for the 7 early?
The S phones always seemed to get an extra year iOS support compared to the Non-S phones.
As long as they continue with security updates in the meantime, I think it's fine.

It seems to me most of the features on iOS 16 require A11 Bionic or newer anyway.
iOS 15 has required an A12 for most of the new features and this continues into iOS16 (even the more details maps!). My guess is the A12 has the ML power needed to do the on-device work whilst the A11 has a first-gen ML engine (never buy 1st gen Apple devices...) and the A10 and earlier don't have any ML cores.

My guess (with a cynical hat on) is that Apple sees the inflationary spiral coming - device prices are going to have to go up to maintain margins, meaning fewer people will upgrade. If they cut off more devices prematurely then perhaps a percentage of them will upgrade just to maintain support with the latest OS despite the higher prices...

If you don't mind second hand, my advice would be to buy an iPhone 12 or better now - it will support all the iOS16 features announced so far and my guess is if the iPhone prices do increase in September, the second hand prices will also go up...
 

jimlat

macrumors newbie
Jun 5, 2013
27
23
1. iPadOS does not support the Lock Screen updates, so they can keep the older iPads and drop the older phones that don’t have the required processor with the neural engine.
2. iPhone 7 was definitely a problem device…failure of the audio system giving no audio and the cellular modem searching no service issue…I’m sure they’re glad to get not of them out of the ecosystem.
 

ian87w

macrumors G3
Feb 22, 2020
8,704
12,636
Indonesia
Apple cannot sustain a business model without planned obsolence.
On phones, alright, as Apple is still leading in terms of support length on smartphones compared to the market standard (ie Android, which is averaging around 2 to 3 years for most).

But for laptops, the support window of Macs is relatively "short" compared to the market standard (ie. Windows). 2015 Macbook Pro, for example, only gets 7 years of support, +2 years of extended support on -2 macOS version. That's still less than 10 years for a premium laptop. Meanwhile, those same Macbooks can still run Windows 10 just fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Magnusson

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,429
12,444
The 7 has a better CPU and more memory than the A9 iPad that will run iOS 16.

The 7 Plus may have more RAM. The 4.7” iPhone 7 just has 2GB same as the A9 iPad.

I believe the A9-A10 iPads are only getting minor improvements to Files app and sharing features on iPadOS 16 anyway. All the other new features require either A12 or M1.

Frankly, I wouldn’t have minded if the iPad 5th and 6th gen was kept on iPadOS 14. Performance with just 2GB RAM kinda sucks on 15.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ediks

oofio2461

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Sep 20, 2021
418
1,738
 Full Moon
On phones, alright, as Apple is still leading in terms of support length on smartphones compared to the market standard (ie Android, which is averaging around 2 to 3 years for most).

But for laptops, the support window of Macs is relatively "short" compared to the market standard (ie. Windows). 2015 Macbook Pro, for example, only gets 7 years of support, +2 years of extended support on -2 macOS version. That's still less than 10 years for a premium laptop. Meanwhile, those same Macbooks can still run Windows 10 just fine.
Samsung is Catching up, used to be supported for 1-2 years, now gets software updates for 4 years and security updates for 5 years.
 

ValhallaOutcast

macrumors regular
Sep 12, 2017
213
149
I coincidently upgraded from a 7+ to a 13 Pro Max last week.

6 years of updates sounds pretty reasonable to me, is that not normal ? I dont really follow iOS that close as some even though I have used iPhone since the 4
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andeddu

Channan

macrumors 68030
Mar 7, 2012
2,866
3,051
New Orleans
The iPhone 7 was released in 2016, thats 6 years ago…. At this point im impressed if the battery is still working. 6 years was a good run.
Really, though. Sure, it may be able to run iOS 16 fine enough but 6 years is such a long time to support a phone. No other manufacturer comes close to that.

And it seems like people forget that the phone won’t stop working. You will still be able to use it for at least a couple more years before apps stop supporting iOS 15.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Student of Life

Andeddu

macrumors 68000
Dec 21, 2016
1,642
2,042
Really, though. Sure, it may be able to run iOS 16 fine enough but 6 years is such a long time to support a phone. No other manufacturer comes close to that.

And it seems like people forget that the phone won’t stop working. You will still be able to use it for at least a couple more years before apps stop supporting iOS 15.
Yeah. I think the biggest miss is the SE because there is no other iPhone with a similar form factor. Even the Mini is a giant compared to the original SE. The 7 form factor is alive and well so those who want to continue with it can move onto the SE’22 and have 5-6 years further iOS support.
 

ian87w

macrumors G3
Feb 22, 2020
8,704
12,636
Indonesia
Samsung is Catching up, used to be supported for 1-2 years, now gets software updates for 4 years and security updates for 5 years.
True, albeit only on its flagship models and select A models. The rest are still 2 years of updates and 3 years of security patches. And that's actually better on Android as others like the Chinese are only doing 1 or no updates with only 2 years of security patches, as that's the minimum requirement for Android certification from Google.

The iPhone 7/7+ is definitely getting the short end of the stick compared to other iPhones, considering the 5th gen iPad with an A9 (the same spec as an iPhone 6s) is still supported.
 

ian87w

macrumors G3
Feb 22, 2020
8,704
12,636
Indonesia
The iPhone 7 was released in 2016, thats 6 years ago…. At this point im impressed if the battery is still working. 6 years was a good run.
Well, the battery can be replaced.
And Apple didn't stop selling the phone right after the release of iPhone 8. They continued selling it, even until 2020 in some markets. So for many people who doesn't buy the phone right at launch, they only get 5 years or less for support, and for no reason since the A9 and A10 on the iPads are still supported.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacLappy

bushman4

macrumors 601
Mar 22, 2011
4,037
3,502
iPhone 7 probably Apples slimmest iPhone ever. Battery life wasn’t great. Oh well it’s gone but not forgotten
 

JPack

macrumors G5
Mar 27, 2017
12,589
23,395
iPhone 7 probably Apples slimmest iPhone ever. Battery life wasn’t great. Oh well it’s gone but not forgotten

The slimmest is iPhone 6. The iPhone 7/Plus has the largest capacity battery of any 4.7- and 5.5-inch iPhone. The battery life was excellent for the time and form factor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jakeuten

oofio2461

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Sep 20, 2021
418
1,738
 Full Moon
Yeah, big sad day to know the days of my iPhone 7+ has ended.... :(
Apple literally cut off 2 generations all at once (6s and 7). And RAM is not an issue as the iPhone 8 is still being supported. So literally a ploy to get that juicy upgrades when the no-update iPhone 13.5 14 is released. Really annoyed with Apple today.
Apple will most likely see a big boost in sales once the 14/14 Pro's comes out due to 6s/7 buying new iPhones. Just a Marketing Decision to "force" upgrade to the latest and greatest.
 

ian87w

macrumors G3
Feb 22, 2020
8,704
12,636
Indonesia
Apple will most likely see a big boost in sales once the 14/14 Pro's comes out due to 6s/7 buying new iPhones. Just a Marketing Decision to "force" upgrade to the latest and greatest.
Definitely. And it might be due to the weak offering of the iPhone 14, if it's basically iPhone 13.5. So Apple decided to put more phones into the grave to nudge more upgraders. And those needing TouchID will get the conveniently-upped-in-price 2022 SE.
 

MacLappy

macrumors 6502a
Jul 28, 2011
530
393
Singapore
At a time where prices of commodities are ever increasing due to shortage, it is disappointing that Apple is ending iOS support for models that clearly have the capability to run said OS, even if it is in a cutdown fashion.

Especially disappointing since Apple is suppose to be a green forward company.

Hopefully there is still security updates on iOS 15 for some years to come.
 

AppliedMicro

macrumors 68020
Aug 17, 2008
2,256
2,612
The only lucky version was iOS12. The rest, Apple immediately drop any sort of support.
If you decide to do another “lucky” long term support version, it makes sense to lump in more phones than usual, as it reduces effort and complexity in developing and backporting fixes. Less OS versions to target.
 

ian87w

macrumors G3
Feb 22, 2020
8,704
12,636
Indonesia
At a time where prices of commodities are ever increasing due to shortage, it is disappointing that Apple is ending iOS support for models that clearly have the capability to run said OS, even if it is in a cutdown fashion.

Especially disappointing since Apple is suppose to be a green forward company.

Hopefully there is still security updates on iOS 15 for some years to come.
Apple's definition of green is in its internal operation (using recycled material, taking out accessories to reduce shipping weight, etc). They never intended their green initiatives to be pro consumer. You still have to buy their products at a regular basis, if not more often. Can't wait until the USB-C iPhone come out, and Apple selling a boatload of USB-C cables at $20 each.
 

Crow_Servo

macrumors 6502a
Feb 17, 2018
890
1,104
America
iPad 7th gen (2019) has the A10 chip so if that were true then that would mean only four years of support which is shorter than usual.
Ah, good point. Then again, didn't the last iPod come out in 2019 with an A10 and is already getting dropped? I guess stranger things have happened. They really shouldn't have been releasing new devices with A10s in 2019.

I guess that would be like them keeping the A13 on this year's iPad 10th gen. It would be a three year old processor right out of the gate. We'll see what they do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Funny Apple Man
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.