Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,770
31,228


Senator Amy Klobuchar last night introduced a revised version [PDF] of the American Choice and Innovation Act, as the U.S. government continues to work toward legislation that targets major tech companies and that would mandate sideloading on the iPhone.

iOS-App-Store-General-Feature-Desaturated.jpg

There are few changes to the bill that would alleviate Apple's concerns about it, and the Cupertino company provided a statement to MacRumors.
We created the iPhone and the App Store to be a safe and trusted place for users to download the apps they love and a great business opportunity for developers everywhere. The result has been an unprecedented engine for economic growth, which has enabled competition and innovation and made it possible for any developer with a great idea to reach Apple customers around the world.

We remain concerned that this legislation threatens to break this model and undermine the privacy and security protections our users depend on. Governments and international agencies worldwide have explicitly advised against sideloading requirements, which would empower bad actors who want to target users--including children--with malware and scams, and make it easier for data-hungry companies to track users without their consent. At the end of the day, the changes made to the bill are a recognition that the legislation, as originally drafted, created unintended privacy and security vulnerabilities for users. We believe the proposed remedies fall far short of the protections consumers need, and urge lawmakers to make further changes to avoid these unintended consequences.
POLITICO this morning reported that some Senate Democrats are pushing back on the bill, but Democratic leaders are aiming for a vote by this summer. Democratic senators have reportedly expressed "deep reservations" about voting for the bill in its current form, as it could be too contentious for an election year, which has led Klobuchar to introduce a new version.

The revised bill is designed to address some of the concerns Senators have raised about the sweeping tech industry changes the legislation would introduce, but Apple maintains that the changes do not go far enough. The company says that the tweaks prove that the original legislation results in "unintended privacy and security vulnerabilities" for users, and that lawmakers need to make further changes to protect user privacy.

The updates make it easier for Apple to defend privacy changes that it implements, but Apple would still be required to demonstrate that each change is "reasonably tailored and reasonably necessary" and that it could not be achieved in another "materially less discriminatory" way. There are no changes to the requirement for Apple to allow for sideloading.

Under the wording of the bill, apps would be able to be installed on iPhones outside of the App Store, making iOS much more similar to the Android platform. Companies like Facebook would be able to work around the privacy protections on the iPhone through sideloading, and would not be subject to Apple's rules against tracking. The bill targets U.S. tech companies that include Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google, but it places no restrictions on non-U.S. companies like Samsung, Oppo, Vivo, and other smartphone manufacturers that compete with Apple, which could be problematic in the future.

Apple has previously said that enabling sideloading would result in a flood of new attacks on iPhone users from bad actors eager to access the sensitive data stored on consumer devices. Predators and scammers would be able to "side-step Apple's privacy and security protections completely," with the bill allowing "malware, scams, and data-exploitation to proliferate."

Apple CEO Tim Cook in November said that consumers who want to sideload apps should look to Android rather than to iPhone. "If that is important to you then you should buy an Android phone," he said in an interview. "From our point of view, it would be like if I were an automobile manufacturer telling [a customer] not to put airbags and seat belts in the car."

Article Link: Apple Says Revised U.S. Sideloading Bill Would 'Undermine the Privacy and Security Protections' iPhone Users Rely On
 
Last edited:

dmx

macrumors 6502a
Oct 25, 2008
731
1,507
I’m confused, does apple care about privacy or not? Or only when convenient to them?

Last I remember Apple is trying to scan every photo on every iCloud user’s iPhone — a feature they have seemingly delayed but not yet canceled.
 
Last edited:

PlayUltimate

macrumors 6502a
Jul 29, 2016
932
1,712
Boulder, CO
I’m confused, does apple care about privacy or not? Or only when convenient to them?

Last I remember Apple is trying to scan every photo on every person’s iPhone — a feature they have seemingly delayed but not yet canceled.
Research the reason for this policy. Apple's approach was designed to avoid a) protect your privacy from Federal rules, b) to protect you from potential criminal prosecution. I agree that the result seemed very Orwellian. But the goal was to protect you from real Federal Orwellian legislation.
 

Pirate!

macrumors regular
Jan 17, 2017
211
369
Would it be possible for Apple to change the rules so that anything that applies to the App Store now applies to installing within the OS itself?
 
  • Like
Reactions: So@So@So

ipedro

macrumors 603
Nov 30, 2004
6,255
8,556
Toronto, ON
Complete BS. It would hurt their bottom line. That’s the only thing it would undermine.

So tired of Apple whining about this. The bill means you have to allow sideloading. Nobody is being forced to do it.

They don't want to lose the tight control they have of the platform.

Some people are incapable of forward thinking and can't imagine the inevitable path on which side loading goes from a choice to virtually mandatory once apps used by the masses like Instagram, Tik Tok or Google stop making their apps available in the App Store and make their apps only available to install via sideloading.

You can only resist for so long until an app comes around that you need for work or to fit in your social circle. Then the whole privacy and security deck of cards Apple built with the App Store comes crashing down. Why would any major app offer their app in the App Store with privacy and security protections if they have the chance to acquire all of your data?
 

Ion-X

Cancelled
Oct 23, 2017
303
1,425
The lack of sideloading is one of the major reasons I go with iOS over Android. For every Fortnite, location spoofer, or porn app you can’t get on iOS, there are thousands of malicious apps that want to steal your information and money that we get to avoid.
 

BurgDog

macrumors 6502
Apr 22, 2012
384
456
Apple rejects apps for reasons other than privacy and security. If privacy and security were the only reasons, Apple might have a point but there is a market for stuff Apple refuses to carry. Allowing alternative download locations means Apple keeps their hands clean of stuff they don't like and gives consumers a choice.
 

mrat93

macrumors 68020
Dec 30, 2006
2,283
3,032
Some people are incapable of forward thinking and can't imagine how side loading goes from a choice to almost mandatory once apps used by the masses like Instagram, Tik Tok or Google stop making their apps available in the App Store and make their apps only available to install via sideloading. You can only resist for so long until an app comes around that you need for work or to fit in your social circle. Then the whole privacy and security deck of cards Apple built with the App Store comes crashing down.
Are there any major apps on Android (Fortnite aside) that aren’t in the Play Store? Or are you just pulling predictions out of a hat?
 

Realityck

macrumors G4
Nov 9, 2015
10,335
15,564
Silicon Valley, CA
Senator Amy Klobuchar last night introduced a revised version [PDF] of the American Choice and Innovation Act, as the U.S. government continues to work toward legislation that targets major tech companies and that would mandate sideloading on the iPhone.
This is not a done deal yet, and we still have yet to see what I anticipate as some major changes with upcoming iOS16 that effects the way OS security works compared to using the App Store as it is presently in iOS15.
 

_Spinn_

macrumors 601
Nov 6, 2020
4,857
10,041
Wisconsin
Research the reason for this policy. Apple's approach was designed to avoid a) protect your privacy from Federal rules, b) to protect you from potential criminal prosecution. I agree that the result seemed very Orwellian. But the goal was to protect you from real Federal Orwellian legislation.
Yeah I didn't like Apple's solution but I hate the government solution more. Just see what the EU has proposed recently. They seem intent on destroying encryption and privacy in order to "save the children." This proposal that would essentially require algorithms to scan ALL emails, messages, or other communications in order to detect "grooming" not just CSAM. If this proposal passes it would essentially create China level internet surveillance in the EU.


More info in this thread:

 

Crow_Servo

macrumors 6502a
Feb 17, 2018
903
1,128
America
Yeah, just like joining unions would "make it harder for [Apple] to act swiftly to address things that employees bring up.”

Sure thing Jane ???
With the risk of unionization, Apple decides to raise their minimum pay, so with the risk of sideloading, Apple may implement a change to iOS/App Store to prevent a more extreme measure. We’ll see.
 

ipedro

macrumors 603
Nov 30, 2004
6,255
8,556
Toronto, ON
Are there any major apps on Android (Fortnite aside) that aren’t in the Play Store? Or are you just pulling predictions out of a hat?

You mean the Play Store that allows apps to collect data from their users and that is natively owned by Google, the world's largest data collector whose entire business relies on data collection?

Jesus... people here just keep confirming that walled gardens with curated experiences and built in protections need to exist to protect some folks from themselves. 🤦🏼‍♂️

Don't want a walled garden? Go to Android. That's the choice.
 

rjohnstone

macrumors 68040
Dec 28, 2007
3,896
4,493
PHX, AZ.
The lack of sideloading is one of the major reasons I go with iOS over Android. For every Fortnite, location spoofer, or porn app you can’t get on iOS, there are thousands of malicious apps that want to steal your information and money that we get to avoid.
Many people who use Android, don't sideload. They have a choice to do so or not. Thus avoiding the spam, scam, data stealing apps is a simple choice.
 

Wildkraut

Suspended
Nov 8, 2015
3,583
7,673
Germany
Look look, the Thief is against Laws that prevents robbery, what a surprise. ?

Looking forward to see Apple pulling out of the US, EU(27 countries), AU,UK,KR… the list is growing… They will have fun selling their crap in Tonga.

That bill will pass I’m confident, USA won’t watch the economy, innovation and competition in the EU getting healthier and growing, while it’s own economy rot and continues to be devoured by a few bigger gatekeepers.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.