The examples of tax and broadcasting standards are not new laws, they are simply bringing relevant parties under them after they had inadvertently been excluded because of technical definitions being outdated for the modern world a.k.a. “loopholes”.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple TV+ and Other Streaming Services Could Face Ofcom Regulation in the UK
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
The examples of tax and broadcasting standards are not new laws, they are simply bringing relevant parties under them after they had inadvertently been excluded because of technical definitions being outdated for the modern world a.k.a. “loopholes”.
I don't see a problem with updating the regulations to include the changes to media offerings. When radio became popular new rules were needed. When TV broadcasting became popular new rules were needed. Streaming is becoming, more and more, the de facto means of consuming video media. Local/National regulations need to be put into place to meet the changing dynamics.
Yes it makes no sense for the content on my TV coming from one input to be subject to different laws than the content coming from another input.
I think this is great news. This is about holding streaming services to the same standards and regulations of liner TV broadcasters. This covers age ratings, ensuring content is safe for target audience, accurate not fake news etc. Why should streaming services regulate themselves in target markets?
I've got no issues with this whatsoever. The rules are about decency, standards, impartiality etc etc so nothing for anyone to be afraid of, least of all the likes of Apple TV+.
Agreed, I know that all the streaming services have to follow broadcasting standards in Canada so I see no reason why I shouldn't apply in Britain also. In all fairness, I don't know how it'll affect the streaming services there, Britain does have a history of censorship and moddle-coddling its audience so streaming services there might turn into a bland, bleached, and kiddie version compared to other countries and for that, I feel you Brit cousins.
You shouldn't worry about us - it really isn't that bad at all. We have plenty of cutting edge TV. The standards really are to maintain the things that should be maintained and no more than that. People worry too much about this kind of stuff. It's not censorship and it's not mollycoddling.
Except when it did last century, lol. They're becoming more and more irrelevant, much like my country, the US.
Do you know what OFCOM is and prevents?
The majority of it is regulations state that adult content, pictures of violence etc have to be labelled so people with kids or people who don’t like those genre’s can easily avoid seeing that content. Apple of all the streaming platforms would be in favour of this, even Disney would be in favour of this considering in the USA they have separated the streaming platforms for their family friendly content, and more adult content, and have only recently launched their adult content under a different brand in the EU.
The rest of rules are there to prevent over advertising and the likes of Alex Jones spouting his conspiracy theories without any counter balance and/or evidence to his claims.
Last edited:
The main inconsistency is legal sexual activity being rated far more harshly than illegal violent activity. Swearing also judged more harshly.
The Theory of Everything (the story of Stephen Hawking) has little of consequence, yet gets a 12 rating, even less in The Imitation Game (the story of Alan Turing), but still a 12 rating. The same rating as the Bourne films that have a lot of violence.
That’s not how the license works. It’s only paid for BBC services, everything else TV wise is funded by advertising or paid contracts such as Sky or Virgin.
That “inconsistency“ merely reflects the difference between your values and those of the regulators.
Varies seemingly week to week. Generally speaking however, mostly US based Globally Dominant Corporations.
I understand their positions. It’s tough to get over Cornwallis‘ failure at Yorktown in 1781.
A TV licence pays for BBC, but is required for watching (or recording) any programme as it is being shown on any TV channel, however it is transmitted (plus anything on iPlayer), even Sky or Virgin. I think the post you quoted might be right that the scope of the licence requirements could be extended to include streaming at the same time as adding Ofcom regulation.