I have noticed the same, but too many samples to be sure about this.
It's a bit stupid to buy an LTE for running without phone and switch it off ...
Do you have the link of this forum/post ?
For me LTE (On) AW5 only runs have (still) been very accurate. I have my crown up position because I like it more that way. Have been using WorkOutDoors.
My bad, I got confused here. The magnet interferes with the compass and not GPS indeed.Huh? Please explain your thinking. I'm not seeing how a magnet in the band would in any way change the gps chip measuring the differences in radio signal arrival time from the visible gps satellites.
It shouldn't be that way really. But if it is that could be the reason why I'm not suffering poor GPS track with LTE on. I have done all my runs on very good LTE coverage.... but it seems that LTE localization is used in case of poor GPS reception ...
And it's not accurate at all. ...
Your test is very interesting and looks like my own tests ...
It's always difficult to be sure to reproduce a run in the same condition, but it seems that LTE localization is used in case of poor GPS reception ...
And it's not accurate at all.
I have 2-3 days to decide if I keep my cellular watch or return it to get a wifi/GPS version
To the testers.. have you tried using a 3P app, like WorkOutDoors that will let you confirm GPS signal strength before starting your activity? I have read that once you are moving GPS acquisition can struggle more. I did a walk recently, about 4 miles and there was one little hiccup but the track looked really good. I had my phone with me but turned off BT.. but it may have turned itself back on.
I will try again today with just the watch, one way with LTE and one way without. WIll be shorter tha 4 miles.. don’t have that much time.
Two samples where we can see big glitches:
Just did a quick 20 minute walk. No phone. 10 minutes out with LTE on and 10 minutes back with LTE off. Both tracks look good IMO. I couldn’t pick a winner. THere is a slight shift in the sidewalk in one part of the route and the track accounted for it well IMO.
I have made some tests during my last night run ...
... and it's difficult to have clear point of view.
I have made one half with LTE ON and one half with LTE OFF.
The trcking look similar in both cases, not perfect but not so bad.
I think LTE coverage was quite good in this area. I have logged with WOD, I don't know if I can analyze more by exportin GPS accuracy data into a GPX ?
After checking, zooming, looking in GPX file of GPS accuracy, I haven't noticed any difference for this specific run.
I have to test again in an area with poor GPS/LTE reception.