The news was pretty big in Australia with those hundreds killed, lots being Aussie tourists...what do you think of this car bomb attack? terrorism? if so, what are your views?
Originally posted by freedom
As long as the US keep sanctioning Israel in their crusade against the muslim (and christian) palestinians the "terror" will go on.
Originally posted by freedom
Why can´t the UN act as "world-police" instead
of the US?
Originally posted by Jays
Israel is just trying to protect it's civilians from more than 50 years from terrorist acts, no other nation had to deal with so much terror!
Originally posted by agreenster
Dont forget though, the Palestinians had been occupying that land for 1000 years before the 1950's when Isreal was reformed as a nation.
Originally posted by marcsiry
This and other incidents demonstrates that recent events aren't a case of the "opressed world" vs. the U.S.
That club in Bali was well known as an Australian hangout, according to a friend who traveled their many times.
This should serve as a wake-up call to all Westerners- don't think you're safe just because you've sewn a Canadian flag to your backpack. It isn't US support of Israel that fundamentalists are fighting against- it's the pervasive influence that Western culture is effecting on their backwards beliefs (radical notions like women should be able to read, etc.)
This is a culture clash but it's not Christian vs. Muslim, or anyone vs. Muslim. It's the developed/developing world vs. fundamentalists of every stripe... regardless of religion.
Television, internet, air travel- all these things destroy distance and isolation, and threaten those cultures that can't stand the competition. Those cultures respond by lashing out, and sowing intolerance of anyone perceived to be threatening their way of life.
Paradoxically, in the modern world the one thing we can't afford to tolerate is intolerance.
Originally posted by e-coli
This is the most intelligent dissection I have ever heard regarding this subject.
You know, I go to the BBC site a lot (because it's the least jigoistic and sensationalized news), and I read some of those "talking points" comments. It never ceases to amaze me. I think so many people (particularly Europeans) are living in this cute little cushy fantasy warld. They all talk about "global equality" and "western opression", and call for a distribution of the worlds wealth. Well, that's a fine solution, but it's hardly going to change things. It's hardly going to give the Muslim world determination to advance on multiple fronts.
I hate to see the West faulted and chastised for inventing the airplane, the automobile, the telephone, the computer, high-strength steel, the light bulb, harnessing electricity, making dramatic strides in science and medicine, and contributing to countless other civilized advancements. The "poor, downtrodden" peoples, as we so tactfully call them, have contributed little - a minuscule lot in comparison - to the advancement of mankind. Like it or not it's, sadly, true.
Yet we are being made to feel guilty because of our hard work, our research, and our ability to fend for ourselves, establish our own governments, and choose our own destiny. Those that hate the West are simply trying to justify their relatively dim contributions to civilization through moral fabrications, manipulation of ignorant, and terror. If they wanted to attack the true causes of their opression, they should attack, and rebuild, their own socio-economic institutions.
We shouldn't be so quick to blame the West for the worlds problems. If we want to pinpoint a true cause, we should blame lack of civilized advancement amongst these peoples.
Just my $.02
Originally posted by macktheknife
Oh boy. I think you should be very careful about what you say. While it is true that the oppressors of the people of the Third World are their own governments or elite, we should not forget that it was Western Imperialism that got many of these countries in their present predicament. Many of these countries--rightly or wrongly--still harbor deep resentment against the West for past subjugation and exploitation. Easy enough for the West to let bygones be bygones; much more difficult more someone living in some African country torn by civil war because the Western Powers drew some lines on a map without regard to region's ethnic makeup.
Originally posted by Chaszmyr
Why can't the UN act as world police instead of the US? Have you ever taken notice of whenever the UN or NATO does anything? 80% of the force usually comes from the US anyway... In terms of saving time its in the US' best interest to act unillaterally.