Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

dmw007

macrumors G4
Original poster
May 26, 2005
10,635
0
Working for MI-6
wdlove said:
Happy t hear the latest news of increased performance. I usually restart mine once a week.

Thanks wdlove :)

Restarting once a week is probably a good idea.
I would leave my Power Mac on 24/7 (folding of course), but my parents frown on that idea. :rolleyes: Anyway...guess it beats having to pay the electric bill... :)
 

FFTT

macrumors 68030
Apr 17, 2004
2,952
1
A Stoned Throw From Ground Zero
O.K. I'm jealous!

I want to add a pair of 1 GB sticks to G5 when budget permits.

I currently have 2 pairs of Apple 256 RAM sticks getting me 1 GB
and I don't know if I'm better off leaving them in place
then adding the additonal RAM in the next slots or if it's
better to place the 1 GB sticks in the primary slots.
Does it matter?
 

dmw007

macrumors G4
Original poster
May 26, 2005
10,635
0
Working for MI-6
FFTT said:
O.K. I'm jealous!

I want to add a pair of 1 GB sticks to G5 when budget permits.

I currently have 2 pairs of Apple 256 RAM sticks getting me 1 GB
and I don't know if I'm better off leaving them in place
then adding the additonal RAM in the next slots or if it's
better to place the 1 GB sticks in the primary slots.
Does it matter?

No, it probably does not matter. But I would probably still stick the 2x1GB sticks in the first/primary slots just to be safe.

I might also be interested in those 2x256MB Dimms if the price is right...let me know. :)
 

dmw007

macrumors G4
Original poster
May 26, 2005
10,635
0
Working for MI-6
FFTT said:
I'll probably end up keeping them bringing my system up to 3 GB's.

I also got hosed for $150 buying the extra two sticks from Apple when I
ordered my system.

Impatience is costly!

Ya keep them, I thought that you had the Rev C 2GHz DP Power Mac G5 (4 dimms) not the Rev B 2GHz DP Power Mac G5 (8 dimms). I thought that you would have had to discard your old RAM sticks...sorry. :)
 

Bob_Barker

macrumors regular
Jun 22, 2004
138
0
Gainesville, FL
Some people ar particular about brands, but I haven't noticed a huge performance difference between Apple Certified Ram and the cheap stuff off of Newegg or OWC.

But getting more RAM is ALWAYS the right thing to do.
 

dmw007

macrumors G4
Original poster
May 26, 2005
10,635
0
Working for MI-6
Bob_Barker said:
Some people ar particular about brands, but have noticed a huge performance difference between Apple Certified Ram and the cheap stuff off of Newegg or OWC.

But getting more RAM is ALWAYS the right thing to do.

I have to agree with you there Bob_Barker-

1) Buying "higher" quality RAM is a smart move.

2) Getting more RAM is always a smart choice.

Glad that I decided against OWC's "el cheapo" RAM since you reported having problems with them. Not what I would have wanted in my Power Mac. :eek:
 

Bob_Barker

macrumors regular
Jun 22, 2004
138
0
Gainesville, FL
I left out a word in my post. What I meant was I HAVE NOT seen any real performance difference between apple certified and OWC/Newegg stuff. I've heard by things about the Rosewill brand, but I have not encountered any problems myself.

The warranty would be the real draw for me to Crucial. I think if you have a working DIMM at any price, performance is probably similar.
 

dmw007

macrumors G4
Original poster
May 26, 2005
10,635
0
Working for MI-6
Bob_Barker said:
I left out a word in my post. What I meant was I HAVE NOT seen any real performance difference between apple certified and OWC/Newegg stuff. I've heard by things about the Rosewill brand, but I have not encountered any problems myself.

The warranty would be the real draw for me to Crucial. I think if you have a working DIMM at any price, performance is probably similar.

Well in that case, sorry that I took your meaning wrong.

Yes, I would imagine that one stick of RAM will be equal in quality and performance to another stick of RAM that is the same type (i.e.- DDR400, PC133, etc...).

But I just feel better buying from a more reputable manufacturer; Provides me more peace of mind (and a warranty). :)
 

JasonGough

macrumors regular
Apr 25, 2005
184
0
Manchester, UK
Sounds cool, i think i'll go get 2 gigs of crucial when i get my PowerMac.

Unless apple up the standard Memory, which they realy should.

How does the Apple Memory compare to the Crucial stuff anyway? is the Apple RAM any better or is it just more expensive for the sake of it?
 

dmw007

macrumors G4
Original poster
May 26, 2005
10,635
0
Working for MI-6
JasonGough said:
Sounds cool, i think i'll go get 2 gigs of crucial when i get my PowerMac.

Unless apple up the standard Memory, which they realy should.

How does the Apple Memory compare to the Crucial stuff anyway? is the Apple RAM any better or is it just more expensive for the sake of it?

Apple RAM in the Power Mac G5 (mine anyway) is from Hynix, and is really no different than any other types of RAM out there- its just that Apples prices for their RAM are way outta whack. I would think that Crucial RAM is just as good (if not better) than the RAM that Apple includes in a Power Mac (or in any Mac for that matter).

So yes, going with 2GB of RAM from Crucial for your Power Mac would be a good idea.
 

wdlove

macrumors P6
Oct 20, 2002
16,568
0
dmw007 said:
Apple RAM in the Power Mac G5 (mine anyway) is from Hynix, and is really no different than any other types of RAM out there- its just that Apples prices for their RAM are way outta whack. I would think that Crucial RAM is just as good (if not better) than the RAM that Apple includes in a Power Mac (or in any Mac for that matter).

So yes, going with 2GB of RAM from Crucial for your Power Mac would be a good idea.

The majority on this forum highly recommend Crucial. The lifetime warranty is important. Like everything else you get what you pay for.

dmw007, have you thought about downloading a free AIM from AOL. That is what works for me with iChat.
 

Bote

macrumors regular
Sep 11, 2005
104
0
Philadelphia PA
I have a mac mini that I bought with 256mb. I upgraded last week to 1 gb. It does perform much better. I don't sit and watch the spinning ball nearly as much. However, coming from a windows background I notice that i still don't get the same snappy performance when opening programs that I get with my windows machine running 512mb. Is this related to my slower G4 processor. If I had a G5 iMac or Powermac would it be snappier or is that just the way that OS X is. Yes, I am a recent convert to Mac. :D
 

IJ Reilly

macrumors P6
Jul 16, 2002
17,909
1,496
Palookaville
Bote said:
I have a mac mini that I bought with 256mb. I upgraded last week to 1 gb. It does perform much better. I don't sit and watch the spinning ball nearly as much. However, coming from a windows background I notice that i still don't get the same snappy performance when opening programs that I get with my windows machine running 512mb. Is this related to my slower G4 processor. If I had a G5 iMac or Powermac would it be snappier or is that just the way that OS X is. Yes, I am a recent convert to Mac. :D

Difficult to say, since we don't know what you are comparing to what in terms of hardware or software.

The UI in OSX does tend to be a bit slower than XP as a general rule. But since Windows doesn't feed anything back to the user when programs are launched I always find it difficult to know what's going on or how fast it's happening.
 

Bote

macrumors regular
Sep 11, 2005
104
0
Philadelphia PA
IJ Reilly said:
Difficult to say, since we don't know what you are comparing to what in terms of hardware or software.

The UI in OSX does tend to be a bit slower than XP as a general rule. But since Windows doesn't feed anything back to the user when programs are launched I always find it difficult to know what's going on or how fast it's happening.

1.7GHz dell. I think that a lot of it is just perception. Things do open quicker on my windows pc but don't necessarily perform their function any better on the windows box. I would wait twice as long for my mac and not really get mad. Atleast I am not spending all that time cleaning internet crap and viruses off of my mac :) I guess my real question is how much more responsive would a G5 be when compared to a G4 Like say opening My adobe elements. It takes me like 5-7 seconds now.
 

IJ Reilly

macrumors P6
Jul 16, 2002
17,909
1,496
Palookaville
Bote said:
1.7GHz dell. I think that a lot of it is just perception. Things do open quicker on my windows pc but don't necessarily perform their function any better on the windows box. I would wait twice as long for my mac and not really get mad. Atleast I am not spending all that time cleaning internet crap and viruses off of my mac :) I guess my real question is how much more responsive would a G5 be when compared to a G4 Like say opening My adobe elements. It takes me like 5-7 seconds now.

I assume the Dell is a P4.

If you have Elements for both Windows and Mac, it might make an interesting experiment to stopwatch opening the same file on both machines. (Make sure both are rebooted before running the tests.) I'd expect the results to be virtually the same; within the margin of error.

The mini does have the disadvantage of a slower (usually 4,800 RPM) hard drive, though. That will hurt in any disk-intensive test. You could speed the mini up by booting it from an external Firewire drive.
 

Bote

macrumors regular
Sep 11, 2005
104
0
Philadelphia PA
IJ Reilly said:
I assume the Dell is a P4.

If you have Elements for both Windows and Mac, it might make an interesting experiment to stopwatch opening the same file on both machines. (Make sure both are rebooted before running the tests.) I'd expect the results to be virtually the same; within the margin of error.

The mini does have the disadvantage of a slower (usually 4,800 RPM) hard drive, though. That will hurt in any disk-intensive test. You could speed the mini up by booting it from an external Firewire drive.

You know, I completely forgot to factor in the slow harddrive. I do have an external FW HD but that is half full of my backups. I will have to pick up a 7200 RPM hd w/8m cache when the money presents itself. I am sure that will speed things up a bit. Gotta pick up that new iPod first....Thanks for the advice. :D
 

dmw007

macrumors G4
Original poster
May 26, 2005
10,635
0
Working for MI-6
Bote said:
You know, I completely forgot to factor in the slow harddrive. I do have an external FW HD but that is half full of my backups. I will have to pick up a 7200 RPM hd w/8m cache when the money presents itself. I am sure that will speed things up a bit. Gotta pick up that new iPod first....Thanks for the advice. :D

Yes, slapping a 7,200rpm HDD should give you snappier performance.

To answer your previous question, when opening/launching an application my Power Mac G5 does it right away. No delay for me. Although I think that a faster HDD should give you similar results.
 

Bote

macrumors regular
Sep 11, 2005
104
0
Philadelphia PA
dmw007 said:
Yes, slapping a 7,200rpm HDD should give you snappier performance.

To answer your previous question, when opening/launching an application my Power Mac G5 does it right away. No delay for me. Although I think that a faster HDD should give you similar results.

I was assuming that a power mac would open things immediatly. Especially will all that new ram you dropped in there. Sounds like a nice system you got there. I will have to get another HD when my money permits.
 

dmw007

macrumors G4
Original poster
May 26, 2005
10,635
0
Working for MI-6
Bote said:
I was assuming that a power mac would open things immediatly. Especially will all that new ram you dropped in there. Sounds like a nice system you got there. I will have to get another HD when my money permits.

Thanks, the Power Mac G5's are awesome machines (too expensive, but still awesome). Love it so much. Will never go back to just using a PeeCee.

Glad to hear that you decided to go with a faster HDD.
I think that you are making that right choice.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.