If they change to a subscription business model, they will lose me as a customer forever.Yeah, that's usually code-speak for "expect changes within 12 months".
If they change to a subscription business model, they will lose me as a customer forever.Yeah, that's usually code-speak for "expect changes within 12 months".
Same applies to me, and reading through this thread.. many others.If they change to a subscription business model, they will lose me as a customer forever.
In the latest release C1 has a "KI Masking" feature, which works well for me and can be used to mask multiple areas, maybe this is what you mean?
Aperture did support non destructive RAW development.
It would be nice if it were, but Serif's Affinty Sutie was always aimed at amateurs and hobbyists who didn't have the money for Adobe products. Affinty Designer never reached Illustrator, but the new VectorStyler is on a good path.Serif decided to focus on users who were graphic artists.
... Affinity already does this I believe, is authenticate licenses through their servers.
What is so terrible about US$299.00 for professional software?I bet they'll do the same as Capture One did: go to a subscription model, but keep a one-time purchase option that is priced so high that it won't be worth it. But they'll be able to say "yes, we'll continue to offer a one-time purchase option".
It lacks in terms of DAM, sadly I haven't found any DAM that is as good as Aperture was.
Specifically, how is C1 way better than LR in RAW processing. What features does it have that LR is lacking. Does it have the multiple auto-masking features LR has?
What made Aperture a non starter was that it didn't support non-destructive editing.
It is not even a close comparison. There is no way to organize your photos so Photomator is a non starter.
Sad to hear, they did things in a good way. That said I'm not that surprised since I thought they didn't do the upgrade from v1 to v2 quite right and may not have got enough from that operation.
Pixelmator Pro is still a one-time purchase.Incredibly sad to see. I guess I should head over to Gimp. Took a chance and went all in with Affinity a few years ago, should have known not to trust paid software.
Say they charge 5 bucks a month for the whole suite. It’s not just the model, many folks could settle for a cheap, monthly payment.if they go subscription they will loose most people to Adobe products
if you gotta pay a subscription your gonna choose the best and what everyone uses as the standard. Adobe.
I’ve just checked and my Affinity software is still working as it did yesterday, whereas Gimp is still buggy as hell.
First, I was half-joking-- I'd be shocked if the changes I'm worried about are implemented this quickly.
But yes, I've seen perpetual products convert to subscription and then become incrementally hamstrung or covered with little reminders everywhere that I need to subscribe to pro features. PDF Expert comes to mind.
I bought the Affinity suite outright, and I can't say I'm familiar with all the terms of their license, but I doubt I'm guaranteed updates for life. I bought the version I bought, not the updated version. Leaving aside my comment about todays release, there's no reason they can't put out an update next month that changes terms. I can keep using what I have installed today, but I don't necessarily have a right to what's released next month.
Again, this is all a bit of paranoid speculation-- there's no hard evidence that they're going to change their model. I think what we're all secretly reacting to is that Affinity was a great deal for what it was and we're worried that good things can't last. Whoever bought them is going to want to earn their purchase price back-- maybe they do that by making the Affinity suite visible to more people and sell more copies, maybe by integrating with the rest of their ecosystem and encourage us to buy more of their products, maybe they raise the price of the product, maybe they go to subscriptions.
Canva leverages subscription based models while Affinity offered a fantastic one time purchase.What exactly makes this incredibly sad to see? You must have read something in the article that I didn’t see, or just jumped to conclusions that are not in this article.