Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

citysnaps

macrumors G4
Oct 10, 2011
11,961
25,949
In the latest release C1 has a "KI Masking" feature, which works well for me and can be used to mask multiple areas, maybe this is what you mean?

For the last two years Lightroom has had the ability to one-click auto-mask people (single or groups), faces, eyes, sky, objects (violins, dogs, lights, cars, anything), background, etc. And the ability to subtract objects (like people) from masked areas. It works incredibly well - and is almost magic-like. And is a HUGE time-saver.

Aperture did support non destructive RAW development.

I first started with Aperture long ago, before LR came out. It did to the extent a hi-res tiff was first created from the raw file, from which edits were applied. That hi-res (large memory) tiff then "traveled" with the unmodified RAW file (thus the RAW file was not modified/destructed). A real kludge. Adobe's method was/is far better in that intermediate tiffs were not created and sucking more memory. And that's why I immediately switched to LR as soon as it was introduced, and also knowing that Adobe's primary business is about image science. And Apple's was about computers and phones, and thus knowing Aperture would not have a long life. Switching was the best decision I ever made.

I played around with C1 and didn't like it. Also... at that point in time I had many tens of thousands of edited RAWs from LR. And there was no way for those edits to be automatically converted to C1. There was no way I was going to re-edit them - that would take a HUGE amount of time, and with no benefit.
 
Last edited:

Artsketch

macrumors regular
Oct 22, 2019
204
146
Serif decided to focus on users who were graphic artists.
It would be nice if it were, but Serif's Affinty Sutie was always aimed at amateurs and hobbyists who didn't have the money for Adobe products. Affinty Designer never reached Illustrator, but the new VectorStyler is on a good path.
 

MacBeast

macrumors newbie
May 1, 2008
16
2
... Affinity already does this I believe, is authenticate licenses through their servers.

I run Little Snitch, so I can see when the Affinity apps try to call home. When I first bought my Affinity license, I allowed the apps to make that connection for initial registration. Since then I have Little Snitch block it, and I haven't noticed any issues with things not working in the apps or any kind of messages in the apps complaining about not having an internet connection. So they may be trying to authenticate, but don't stop working if they can't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Analog Kid

jagolden

macrumors 68000
Feb 11, 2002
1,531
1,403
Affinity is spinning it as all rainbows and Unicorns, but I see subscriptions lurking in the shadows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AAPLGeek

Think creative

macrumors 6502
Jul 27, 2013
406
881
This is fine. For the cover design work I use Affinity for, it works great, and works great on the latest Mac OS. I'll make sure to download an extra copy to have when I buy my next apple desktop in the next 12 months, (Probably a mac studio if they get M3 chips) and from there, even if they switch to a subscription service or "add new features" it won't matter to me I have a stable version now, that does what i want it to do, because I paid for it once.
 

bousozoku

Moderator emeritus
Jun 25, 2002
15,880
2,084
Lard
I bet they'll do the same as Capture One did: go to a subscription model, but keep a one-time purchase option that is priced so high that it won't be worth it. But they'll be able to say "yes, we'll continue to offer a one-time purchase option".
What is so terrible about US$299.00 for professional software?

I seem to remember Adobe charging that much for their upgrades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JD2015

cateye

macrumors 6502a
Oct 18, 2011
640
2,494
As a working designer and creative studio owner for 25 years, this thread is a laugh riot. The Serif apps were largely market failures and Serif the company was known to be losing money. Canva has a beach head targeting professionals in business/marketing settings and projects a tier below requiring the lift of an agency or creative department. Guaranteed they will steer what remains of the Affinity Suite in that direction, as a service offering. They would be fools not to.
 

gregoryfu

macrumors newbie
Oct 26, 2012
15
10
Probably not much chance in the short term, but hopefully generative fill will come to AP now, since Canva has it. That's the only reason I need to open Photoshop.
 

Slartibart

macrumors 68030
Aug 19, 2020
2,906
2,620
It lacks in terms of DAM, sadly I haven't found any DAM that is as good as Aperture was.

Specifically, how is C1 way better than LR in RAW processing. What features does it have that LR is lacking. Does it have the multiple auto-masking features LR has?

What made Aperture a non starter was that it didn't support non-destructive editing.

It is not even a close comparison. There is no way to organize your photos so Photomator is a non starter.

Well, you might like to try Nitro from the former Aperture development lead… coming to iPad too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alwis

mac-rumorist

macrumors newbie
Aug 13, 2021
22
35
When I found Affinity I was happy to pay to leave Inkscape behind (on mac) for speed and joy. Let's see.
Simple svg stuff and cmyk was the key.
 

th0masp

macrumors 6502a
Mar 16, 2015
834
500
Sad to hear, they did things in a good way. That said I'm not that surprised since I thought they didn't do the upgrade from v1 to v2 quite right and may not have got enough from that operation.

Same here. Designer/Photo V1 are in daily use here.

Skipped V2 entirely so far. IMO that one went very much against what the user base fleeing Adobe wanted and bought into with version 1. It's like they swapped out the decision makers making all the good calls from one release to the next.
 

Vulkan

macrumors 6502
Apr 16, 2005
355
145
Useless, TX
I read the article this morning and the first thing I thought was "Welp there goes Pay to Use". The only reason Serif must have caved would be financial pressure. I was hoping they announced a Video Editing Suite in the same level as the restof their affinity tools.

If they go sub or in someway force you to get Canva to get the other tools, I'm going back to Adobe. They said in the tweet they dont have plans to change anything in the foreseeable future, which it translates to "we dont have anything on the table to offer in this space so we will get back to you..." I give them a year before they announce subscriptions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UnbreakableAlex

Manzanito

macrumors 65816
Apr 9, 2010
1,078
1,756
Time to look into alternatives. Pixelmator, I guess? I left adobe because of the subscription model, and the wording of the agreement makes me think starting with v3 that’ll happen to serif’s apps too.

Damn it, I really liked serif!
 

bradman83

macrumors 6502a
Oct 29, 2020
965
2,392
Buffalo, NY
Incredibly sad to see. I guess I should head over to Gimp. Took a chance and went all in with Affinity a few years ago, should have known not to trust paid software.
Pixelmator Pro is still a one-time purchase.

And Serif has said that there will be no changes to your existing Affinity license. If you have version 1 or version 2 then it will continue working as long as macOS supports it.
 

Manzanito

macrumors 65816
Apr 9, 2010
1,078
1,756
if they go subscription they will loose most people to Adobe products

if you gotta pay a subscription your gonna choose the best and what everyone uses as the standard. Adobe.
Say they charge 5 bucks a month for the whole suite. It’s not just the model, many folks could settle for a cheap, monthly payment.

How much does adobe charge for the tier with illustrator these days? 60$ a month?
 

bradman83

macrumors 6502a
Oct 29, 2020
965
2,392
Buffalo, NY
The entire value proposition of Affinity apps are that they are one-time purchases and therefore are a better deal for casual users. I don't see Canva doing away with that, at least not entirely. I do foresee several possibilities though:
  • The Affinity suite will be offered as a subscription option for existing Canva subscribers or standalone, with a perpetual license purchase as a continued option (similar to Microsoft Office today).
  • Affinity under Canva will release new paid upgrade versions more frequently. Whereas Affinity stayed on version 1.x for years with continual new features and improvements, I expect going forward each major numbered version will have a set feature set and then just maintenance/compatibility updates for a period. New features will be reserved for the next paid version. (Side note: Serif was pretty open about the fact that they had to both raise pricing and charge for version 2 of the Affinity suite because their revenue was taking a hit; free upgrades are good for customers but bad for keeping the lights on).
  • Canva will (hopefully) add additional product categories to further capture revenue, such as video editing apps or a Lightroom raw photo processing alternative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiaBchDave

katbel

macrumors 68040
Aug 19, 2009
3,381
29,199
Be aware though of updating to the latest version- maybe it's not the current one-
that will bug you to update to a Canva one, subscription or not.
I always keep the last one I know is functioning, aside to avoid updates I'm going to regret.
 

Wando64

macrumors 68020
Jul 11, 2013
2,190
2,784
First, I was half-joking-- I'd be shocked if the changes I'm worried about are implemented this quickly.

But yes, I've seen perpetual products convert to subscription and then become incrementally hamstrung or covered with little reminders everywhere that I need to subscribe to pro features. PDF Expert comes to mind.

I bought the Affinity suite outright, and I can't say I'm familiar with all the terms of their license, but I doubt I'm guaranteed updates for life. I bought the version I bought, not the updated version. Leaving aside my comment about todays release, there's no reason they can't put out an update next month that changes terms. I can keep using what I have installed today, but I don't necessarily have a right to what's released next month.

Again, this is all a bit of paranoid speculation-- there's no hard evidence that they're going to change their model. I think what we're all secretly reacting to is that Affinity was a great deal for what it was and we're worried that good things can't last. Whoever bought them is going to want to earn their purchase price back-- maybe they do that by making the Affinity suite visible to more people and sell more copies, maybe by integrating with the rest of their ecosystem and encourage us to buy more of their products, maybe they raise the price of the product, maybe they go to subscriptions.

At some point they will move on to V3 and, as it was with V2, it will be an entirely new product with its own pricing structure (subscription or not).
At that point they will stop updating and supporting V2, but V2 will carry on working as before until Apple itself will accidentally make it incompatible with a new MacOS version.
Personally I am very happy with the functionality of V2 and I don’t need anything more, so I don’t care much for what is happening.
Sure I would love to have some generative AI functions, but they were never going to happen until a new, paid for, update was released. So nothing much has changed.
It is not written anywhere that Serif would not have moved to a subscription model anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yonizzle

v3rlon

macrumors 6502a
Sep 19, 2014
890
710
Earth (usually)
What exactly makes this incredibly sad to see? You must have read something in the article that I didn’t see, or just jumped to conclusions that are not in this article.
Canva leverages subscription based models while Affinity offered a fantastic one time purchase.
The concern/expectation is that Canva will make the next version of Affinity a subscription, which would be incredibly sad to see. There is already a capable, yet ofttimes despised, subscription based software in this market. Some people hate it in particular because of the subscription model.
For example, one person in this thread subscribed fairly early, only to have Adobe's login servers go down, locking him out of his own content. His login stuff was exposed in some Adobe hack, and then he was charged an extra $100 to unsubscribe. Figure that guy is avoiding in Adobe products like the plague now and forevermore.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.