I'd like to see it simply used as a conduit for playing multiplayer games on my Sony LCD in the living room rather than a direct competitor for the PS3/Xbox360/Wii. That'd be perfect imo.
No, it's more that iTV isn't a Mac, it's a device, and its purpose isn't to play games, it's to play your digital media files.
I mean, honestly. We already have three gaming consoles this generation, we don't need another gaming device in our living rooms. It'd just be silly.
yes but it streams from your mac / pc, potentially allowing to play them games from the living room, not built in games, we're all pretty sure itv will have draft/pr n wireless so the lag shouldnt really be noticeable i wouldnt have thought
AKA the NETWORK APPLICATION of those things. Do you know what the data rate is for a raw digital 1920 x 1080 signal at 60Hz and 24-bit color? 355MB/s. That's megabytes. The typical throughput for 802.11n is 200Mbit/s. That's Megabits, aka about 25 megabytes per second. Not nearly enough. To send a full HD display wirelessly you'd need to encode it to something to compress it in REALTIME (tremendous CPU power required for this) and it'd be lossy.ok, i wont pretend i know but ive read this
"draft 802.11n-compliant networking products offer truly blazing throughput: fast enough to handle streaming high-definition video and multimedia, VoIP, gaming and large-scale file sharing without the aggravation caused by latency problems."
and others in quite a few places. i kinda thought that was half the point in 'n'
ok, i wont pretend i know but ive read this
"draft 802.11n-compliant networking products offer truly blazing throughput: fast enough to handle streaming high-definition video and multimedia, VoIP, gaming and large-scale file sharing without the aggravation caused by latency problems."
and others in quite a few places. i kinda thought that was half the point in 'n'
Well, when they say "gaming" they mean multiplayer gaming over a network. Just like when they say high definition video and all those other services, they're talking about streaming of compressed digital data. Obviously 802.11n will be fast enough for this802.11b is fast enough for multiplayer network gaming for Chrissakes. That's latency dependent more than bandwidth.I seriously doubt this will be a solution for gamers. I mean, look at how gamers whine on these boards if they get less than 60fps on a computer game, even though movies that you see at the theater are filmed at 24fps. I just don't see wireless technologies being able to handle fast action games. Simpler games, sure, but not fast action games.
What do you mean by a conduit? It's just a streaming device (possibly with caching) that allows viewing of media remotely over a network. There's no possible way it'll be able to do what you want. The latency would be too high fo a start. Games are interactive, any delay and you've ruined the game.
Oh, didn't realise the specs were that limiting. I'd just thought that with the wireless new standard being so quick that any lag wouldn't be an issue.
Would be a shame if the option wasnt there. Wireless keyboard/mouse + Lcd TV + comfy sofa= gaming bliss. Suppose we'll have to wait and see whats technically possible next year.