Why would if make a difference what computer is being used to dual boot. As far as I can see, all of the intel macs should be able to dual boot. Can anyone explain why some computers would not be able to?
iphil said:Even If vista could run native speed on x86 Mac (dual boot) i'd hate it..
Reason why: xp/vista should stay on dell/hp etc.. I'd want str8 apple hardware/software <<IMHO..
I dont wanna have run anti-virus software on a mac even it would be windows' partition.. I already got enough win. hell as it is ..
Steve1496 said:The biggest reason some of the computers may not boot is graphics/vga. The CSM was developed on a 17" iMac, so that and 17"MBP will work (they use mostly the same hardware). The Mac Mini uses Intel GMA950 graphics, so the CSM had to be modified (the fill size) to fit the Mini's graphics.
iphil said:Even If vista could run native speed on x86 Mac (dual boot) i'd hate it..
Reason why: xp/vista should stay on dell/hp etc.. I'd want str8 apple hardware/software <<IMHO..
I dont wanna have run anti-virus software on a mac even it would be windows' partition.. I already got enough win. hell as it is ..
Aurora said:Why are you in this particular forum again?
Aarow said:Believe it or not but some people don't want two computers on their desk! Craziness.
iphil said:this stuff i've said is IMHO .. and i'm just stating my opinion on the Win. on Mac issue