For me USB - C is pur crap. Too delicate and I generally order 2 replacements at a time. With old folks (like me) or kids it is far too easy to trip or bend the fragile little connection. Apple had a better idea and the goofy politicians in the EU have lost their commonsense or have been bribed. ?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
EU Law That Could Force the iPhone to Switch to USB-C to Be Presented Next Month
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Given how slow and inefficient wireless charging is, I think that's a very bad idea at the current state of technology.
Probably a push. The phone end is going to break a lot more than with lightning, but a lot of those repairs will be covered by warranty.
Maybe 2022 will go completely wireless ?![]()
Apple may be forced to remove the Lightning port from the iPhone in favor of USB-C, according to legislation expected be presented by the European Commission next month, Reuters reports.
![Apple-Prefer-Lightning-Over-USB-C-Feature.jpg]()
The legislation would establish a common charging port for all mobile phones and other relevant devices in all European Union countries. The move is expected to primarily affect Apple, since many popular Android devices already feature USB-C ports.
In 2018, the European Commission tried to reach a final resolution on the issue but it failed to come into law. At the time, Apple warned that forcing a common charging port on the industry would stifle innovation and create electronic waste as consumers were forced to switch to new cables.
A European Commission impact assessment study conducted in 2019 found that half of all charging cables sold with mobile phones had a USB micro-B connector, 29 percent had a USB-C connector, and 21 percent had a Lightning connector. The study suggested five options for a common charger, with various options that cover ports on devices and ports on power adapters.
Last year, the debate was reignited as the European Parliament overwhelmingly voted in favor of a common charger, citing less environmental waste and user convenience as the main benefits.
The executive branch of the European Union is currently drafting the legislation, according to sources speaking to Reuters, which is expected to be presented next month.
Article Link: EU Law That Could Force the iPhone to Switch to USB-C to Be Presented Next Month
I'll admit... I've warmed up to USB-C as I've used it more, and as I've had more failed Lightning connections than I care to admit. The older 30-pin connector was far more reliable for me than Lightning has been, sadly.
I never connect a cable to my iPhone XR anymore. Zero. And it works perfectly day after day.
I charge on a slow wireless charger at night, but during the day it’s wired in the car as I use CarPlay.
This, and when people buy a $0.99 usb-c cable that is of equal quality to the lightning cable apple refused to sell them for less than $19, it will be one more opportunity for recognizing how much they are being ripped off.
The two-facedness of some people posting here is hilarious: "USB-C is inferior to Lightning" ??????
Where was your whining when Apple switched iPad Pro line to the USB-C connector with Thunderbolt, or iPad Air??? Bunch of two-faced hypocrites who would most likely sell their mother to appease Apple!
Where was your whining when Apple switched iPad Pro line to the USB-C connector with Thunderbolt, or iPad Air??? Bunch of two-faced hypocrites who would most likely sell their mother to appease Apple!
Last edited:
The criticism concerns the hardware of the hardware of the computer side socket and this is inferior to lightning. That USB-C may contain more usefull signals is an entirely other question.
Apple worked with the USB-IF on what became USB-C, but obviously didn’t get what they hoped for out of the deal. USB-IF also rejected thunderbolt as a contribution for ten years, until they adopted it as the basis for USB4. Also, remember how android and iPhone devices had different USB higher power charging standards because the USB-If decided to roll out something incompatible with how Apple had done it for about 7 years.
It is all cost IMHO. Apple is willing to invest more in the connector for things like slimmer device profile or higher IPXX ratings, but USB-IF has a lot of members trying to shave pennies off of flash memory sticks and the like.
the irony is that USB-C is basically what apple gave up with the 30 pin connector - a bazillion non-interoperable device modes. I’m sure those from the iPod era remember the plethora of accessories for AV hookup which were each only compatible with a portion of the iPod/iPhone/iPad range. It is like that with say HDMI adapters now on USB-C
Every non-computing device apple sells is lightning or wireless charging: mice, keyboards, headphones, remote controls, watches, etc.
Timeline wise, lightning launched several years before USB-C. It is more likely the USB-IF didn’t like that lightning was `take-it-or-leave-it` since it was mechanically/electrically done and shipping - the IF wanted to add lanes, cut cost, etc
you likely mean mini USB, which was obsoleted by micro USB. You still had fairly large vendors like Amazon shipping mini 5+years after it was a known bad design - the connector on device failed at around 800 insertions average IIRC, and mobile phones often did not make it through a two year contract before failing.
USB has a lot of non-interoperable alt modes, including three charge modes. These all require additional hardware support.
Apple designed lightning so that it only had three modes - pure charging, usb data and ‘accessory protocol’ which is just a data stream. Hardware like a HDMI adapter have to use one of these modes - HDMI for instance used a data stream of H.264 and has a little ARM controller to decode it. This allowed Apple to maintain forward and backward compatibility, a the expense of higher dongle/cable cost.
USB-IF has vendors from all over the spectrum, and so a fair number of implementers are absolutely against even pennies of additional cost. the irony is that now conformant hardware has to implement craploads of backward compatibility as a result - all in hardware.
nah, there are real costs involved in the superior-designed lightning connector. those redundant usb-c pins were to make usb 2-only and Power delivery 1 only cables possible and dirt cheap, and to make usb-c to usb-a adapters dirt cheap.
I think the Pro iPhones will get USB-C to match the iPad Pro. I think the base iPhone goes portless. This is regardless of what the EU does.
Wireless charging is bad for the batteries, since it produces more heat due to its inefficiency.
EU Law That Could Force the iPhone to Switch to USB-C to Be Presented Next Month
The US adopted metric as a standard over 50 years ago. One inch is defined as exactly 25.4mm.
forums.macrumors.com
True.
But even with a cable... the battery can get pretty hot while charging.
I have one of those tiny Anker Nano 20W GAN chargers. My iPhone 12 Pro Max is cookin' when it is charging!
So it seems wireless charging *and* ultra-fast charging can heat the batteries.
Well, if you have time you can always go back to one of Apple's old 5W charging cubes, which are roughly the same speed as wireless charging but should produce less heat.
Well, if you have time you can always go back to one of Apple's old 5W charging cubes, which are roughly the same speed as wireless charging but should produce less heat.
Exactly.
I've added the Anker Nano to my travel kit (not that I travel much anymore!)
And I use a "normal" charger around the house.
Same here. Man I miss traveling.Exactly.
I've added the Anker Nano to my travel kit (not that I travel much anymore!)
And I use a "normal" charger around the house.
Its the best until Apple tells you next year what’s best for your iPhone and accessories. Then you’ll be ranting and raving about that.