If he was auctioning it for charity, why isn't his auction a charity auction?
No fees / incentives when an actual charity auction.
I was wondering that as well. Perhaps his charity isn't available via that? (Giving Works is available in Canada)
If he was auctioning it for charity, why isn't his auction a charity auction?
No fees / incentives when an actual charity auction.
According to the article, at least 50 people who support charity, have a sense of humor, and don't follow the Apple/Samsung wars would like to have this.
I'm surprised that he hasn't been sued by Samsung because of his name!
The day that I understand the significance of this, is the day I have reached the final level and get "that glow".
Who would want this
They may have a policy regarding the return of shirts and business cards upon leaving Apple. Some businesses will deduct it from your final paycheck if you do not return company property. I think they can do that as long as conditions are specified prior to the items being issued. Anyway at this point it's just cheap PR.
Just saw on CNN that Samsung is suing Sam Sung for name infringement. Mr. Sung's parents are also named in the suit as co-defendants. Apple has offered legal assistance to Sam Sung to protect him from Samsung's law suit calling it frivolous.
###
Wouldn't following the wars make it more desirable? Adds to the humor?
Who would want this
Typical Sam Sung. Copying Jony Ive's auctioning of Apple merch for charity. Doesn't have an original thought!
Are we sure he's not just selling a copy?
If he was auctioning it for charity, why isn't his auction a charity auction?
No fees / incentives when an actual charity auction.
One of the many who are generous enough to make generous contributions to Children's Wish. It certainly won't be anyone that only focuses on gi'me gi'me gi'me.
----------
It's pretty sad when someone condemns charitable giving.
It's even sadder when so many agree with that condemnation.
----------
Who cares? What difference does it make. There are likely hundreds of his cards he handed out flowing around. It's for charity!
----------
Likely because he lives in Canada, and it's a lot easier to auction on ebay than set up a charity auction through the government.
It's seriously not funny, and worse, there will be someone believing it.
I know where I currently work, you are asked to turn in all shirts and badges at time of leaving - in part to make sure you don't try and pretend to still work for them. But also because they don't charge you for any of it to begin with and if it's in good condition, they can possibly reuse it later if an employee needs a shirt NOW and a new one isn't available.
It's cute. Obviously with the troubles these two companies seem to have it is just a little bit of, dare I say it, tech history. He did a good job of displaying it and making it something that was worth buying if you're into that and best of all, he is doing it for charity. I dig it.Who would want this
That was cute...let the hunt begin!Now only if former Samsung employee App Le would do the same...
I thought so just based on knowledge from a recent employee now former employee but...Policy says otherwise. You are required to return the shirts and not allowed to keep them. Used to be different but that's the way it is now.
You are suppose to return all apple shirts/fleece and lanyards when you leave apple. But none of us do.
So, did anyone notice that it is over $80K now?
Just saw that myself. I'm wondering how that will work out for him tax wise? I don't know Canada tax laws but in the US that would be considered income and even turning around and donating the entire amount to charity wouldn't offset the whole tax liability.
The irony being that Apple has sued (or at least has been reported suing) more people regarding the "Apple" name and other of it's product names than Samsung.
Just saw that myself. I'm wondering how that will work out for him tax wise? I don't know Canada tax laws but in the US that would be considered income and even turning around and donating the entire amount to charity wouldn't offset the whole tax liability.