Exactly, you would take the phone and not a camera - because the Z9 isn’t versatile enough to be manageable in that situation. Are you not seeing our point here at all?
So I am confused on the one hand I am implying that you are not knowledgeable yet you want me to explain why a range finder and a fast spray and pray camera are not aimed at the same audience?
The Z9 from Nikon site: Nikon’s most advanced AF system ever re-defines tenacious. Day-long shoots. Hours of 8K video. The most extreme locations. The fastest action. The Z 9 stands up to the toughest professional demands—and then some.
The M11 from Leica : The Leica M11 combines traditional rangefinder photography with innovative, contemporary camera technology. This newly developed masterpiece offers a choice of image resolution and numerous innovations that result in a vastly superior user experience. The M11 provides maximum flexibility, the highest image quality [sic so far in a Leica] and timeless build and design; the perfect tool for expressing your individual artistic vision.
Yes I read your post but you are being so stubborn you are missing the point of how single focussed you are being.
There you go making it about the money again. You yourself have shown above that the money is the same regardless of your chosen kit load out and the resale values by far outstrip the resale on the non-Leicas and so your point about the money is utter nonsense. I can point at countless examples where the Leica purchase is more sensible than other brands in terms of TCO. Again, which bit of this are you not understanding?
I think you need to stop being personal, suggesting people need to get out more is just rude.
