Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

wepiii

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 22, 2012
553
153
About a week ago I purchased a Late 2015 iMac with the following specs...

3.2 GHz Intel Core i5
8 GB DDR3 Ram
AMD R9 M390 2048MB
1 TB Fusion Drive

I loved the screen, but was honestly a little underwhelmed with the speed. I was not surprised at all when I read that Apple had switched the SSD portion of the fusion drive to 24GB on the 1TB Fusion Drive models. After I had it all set up, I was only using about 73GB.

Long story short, I was able to purchase the following iMac this week for $1 less overall using a BB 10% coupon:

3.3 GHz Intel Core i5
8 GB DDR3 Ram
AMD R9 M395 2048MB
2 TB Fusion Drive

I restored the new 2TB model from my Time Machine backup of the 1TB iMac and have them set up right next to each other. The 2TB model immediately felt faster, but I figured it was all in my head so I decided to run a speed test.

Here are the results:

iMac 1TB:
Write 353 MB/Sec
Read 820 MB/Sec

iMac 2TB:
Write 665 MB/Sec
Read 1687 MB/Sec

All that being said, if I was using more than 72 GB of space, i'm sure it would even out in time, but I was really surprised by the difference still.

Anyway, I thought this post might help anyone on the fence between the 1TB and 2TB models. I won't be returning it until the morning, so if you guys want me to run any other tests let me know.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3737.JPG
    IMG_3737.JPG
    2.2 MB · Views: 272
  • Like
Reactions: cerberusss

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,627
43,630
Nice comparison, but a I just wanted to point out the drive in the 2TB fusion drive is a 7200 RPM (at least in the 27" model), I'm not sure about the 1TB fusion drive so that would be one factor to explain the differences.
 

bogg

macrumors 6502
Apr 12, 2005
447
78
Sweden
Nice comparison, but a I just wanted to point out the drive in the 2TB fusion drive is a 7200 RPM (at least in the 27" model), I'm not sure about the 1TB fusion drive so that would be one factor to explain the differences.
1tb fusion also has a 7200rpm
 

wepiii

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 22, 2012
553
153
Nice comparison, but a I just wanted to point out the drive in the 2TB fusion drive is a 7200 RPM (at least in the 27" model), I'm not sure about the 1TB fusion drive so that would be one factor to explain the differences.

The spinning HD in both models is a 7200 RPM drive. The only difference other than size is in the SSD portion of the fusion drive.
 

bogg

macrumors 6502
Apr 12, 2005
447
78
Sweden
7200rpm on 1TB fusion on 27"


Edit: oops just realized that was the non-fusion
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    88.4 KB · Views: 208

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,627
43,630
The spinning HD in both models is a 7200 RPM drive. The only difference other than size is in the SSD portion of the fusion drive.
Ok, thanks for the clarification, I knew the 2TB drive was a faster drive, I wasn't sure about the 1TB.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.