Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Mac Curious

macrumors member
Original poster
Jan 1, 2007
46
0
I want to run some Windows based programs on my MacBook; I know I'll need either Parallels or VMWare Fusion. What I don't know is whether or not I need Boot Camp. If it is optional, what are the pros and cons? Thanks for the help.

Mac Curious
 

JNB

macrumors 604
I want to run some Windows based programs on my MacBook; I know I'll need either Parallels or VMWare Fusion. What I don't know is whether or not I need Boot Camp. If it is optional, what are the pros and cons? Thanks for the help.

Mac Curious


With Parallels or VMWare, you won't need to BootCamp. BC is only for dual-booting, whereas the others launch a virtual machine, sharing resources, while the native OS is still running.

Me? I do both BC and Parallels (using the BC partition) interchangeably, depending on the task at hand.
 

meagain

macrumors 68030
Nov 18, 2006
2,570
26
How does one decide if they should run Windows natively via say - Fusion, or thru Bootcamp? Which way is best for the computer, speed, etc? I have Fusion and didn't even realize it didn't need a partition/bootcamp.
 

JNB

macrumors 604
How does one decide if they should run Windows natively via say - Fusion, or thru Bootcamp? Which way is best for the computer, speed, etc? I have Fusion and didn't even realize it didn't need a partition/bootcamp.

Fusion is a virtualization, like Parallels. The Mac OS is still running. With BC you boot into Windows directly--it is, in fact, now a Windows machine.

The method used depends on the needs of the app being run. Most typical productivity apps run just fine in virtual machines, RAM being the limiting factor. CPU or GPU-intensive apps may call for full hardware use through BC.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.