Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Longplays

Suspended
Original poster
May 30, 2023
1,308
1,156
Still not 5nm or even an SoC with an iGPU that has better than Intel iGPU performance

core-ultra-family-crop.png


 
  • Haha
Reactions: Adult80HD

Icelus

macrumors 6502
Nov 3, 2018
378
498
Much clearer... :(

* Core Ultra 7 1003H (16C/22T)
* Core Ultra 7 1002H (16C/22T)
* Core Ultra 5 1003H (14C/18T)
 

anshuvorty

macrumors 68040
Sep 1, 2010
3,376
4,850
California, USA
Its so obvious that Intel is using Apple's nomenclature so that clueless consumers will be confused and buy their chips instead of the Apple Silicon chips :p
 

4087258

Cancelled
Mar 1, 2021
158
422
Intel lineup is a complete joke.
Different singlecore and gpu performances for each chip on each generation; celeron, atom, i3, i5, i7, i9, xeon… The consumer always get screwed.
 

dmccloud

macrumors 68030
Sep 7, 2009
2,990
1,727
Anchorage, AK
The rebranding itself should indicate how worried Intel actually is regarding Apple Silicon. It feels like a lame attempt to capitalize on "ultra" branding, and it could be a way to restart their numbering scheme

If Apple trademarked anything including the word "Ultra" for it's SoCs, they could (in theory) have a trademark case against Intel for this one.
 

SB1500

Suspended
Dec 31, 2021
147
104
I heard about this on the LTT podcast. I think it's definitely related to Apple's naming scheme. If lucky, Intel will confuse customers into thinking it's the same or similar... What ever happened to i3, i5, i7? That was easy. Didn't even know there was an i9.. since when?!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.