Yep, they probably saw the huge generativeAI explosion in 2023, and reacted a bit late.Sounds like they were caught flat footed on this one.
Yep, they probably saw the huge generativeAI explosion in 2023, and reacted a bit late.Sounds like they were caught flat footed on this one.
Ha she thought. Siri seems less capable now than it did like 7 years ago. Sure doesn’t accomplish my HomeKit commands like it did years ago.There's a lot of confusion about this whole "AI" thing. It's not one thing. AI has many, many facets. Apple has employed machine learning for decades, but that's a totally different kind of technology from the "generative AI" that stormed onto the scene last year. Open AI was working on their tech for 10 years before the "ChatGPT era" was born, so I guess Appe can't be held totally unaccountable, but to say that Siri fell behind is a reach.
Siri does what s/he's designed to very well for most cases. S/he is vastly improved since the inauguration. Any claim otherwise is heavily biased.
What I hope that they will do is to graft a large action model onto Siri to interpret user intent and to coordinate with multiple apps and services to respond to the request. One of those services could be an external chatbot, just as the current Siri will use external web search results for some responses (maybe too often).They’re specifically saying they’re not making a GPT chat-bot. There are a number of ways to read that. The optimistic read is that they have a more useful and interesting implementation of AI on iPhone. A smarter, more capable Siri does not have to be a chat-bot to be vastly better.
Looks like Apple is resting on their laurels when it comes to AI.
Good? Who really expected this? Not their style, tbh.
Good grief, really? Apple are toast in the AI race then!Giannandrea, a former tech executive at Google, has been leading Apple’s A.I. projects, including voice assistant Siri
I think it is currently too late and it will cost further market shares (looking at the chinese market and the occurred 2024 drop).Of course it won’t! Apple didn’t even know what the word AI meant until Tim Cook read about ChatGPT in the newspaper.
Now it’s all hands on deck… cancel all other projects, get them on this new shiny toy… ‘lets come late to the party but be better’ BAU.
Yes, Apple is behind in some aspects of AI. Though Apple have been doing AI (not counting Siri) for several years it is not the current flavor of the day ChartGPT-style so they need to look outside for that functionality for now. Eventually they will either build their own or fully integrate with a third party LLM. In a couple of years, this current controversy will be forgotten.
Apple had their own mini but dropped it for no good reason. 🤪Licensing Gemini is pathetic.
they seem to regret inventing it in the first place
ExactlyThey’re specifically saying they’re not making a GPT chat-bot. There are a number of ways to read that. The optimistic read is that they have a more useful and interesting implementation of AI on iPhone. A smarter, more capable Siri does not have to be a chat-bot to be vastly better.
Apple probably saw it coming, but couldn’t do anything about it because of their position on privacy. They’re in the same position today, hence their last resort partnership with Google and Baidu.
Generative AI ain’t happening on a local device any time soon. Siri isn’t going to help rewrite messages or help finish a report without sending that info to the cloud. You can’t have a good conversation or make good recommendations without sharing personal content. Apple doesn’t do that with their focus on privacy, so they’ll fall behind until AI models get small enough and local processing is faster.
I bet you were big on “web3” and blockchain as well right?Wrong. It isn’t about a customer-facing ChatGPTesque tool, it’s about the backbone of the technology that will power websites, apps and devices in the future.
Already Apple are scrambling to find a partner rather than being the partner.
Don’t get your hopes up. Apple let Siri languish for over 10 years, probably because it can’t be monetized. They’ve never seen the reason to work hard at it.Can we just have a Siri that works?