Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Appl3FTW

macrumors 603
Original poster
Nov 15, 2012
5,552
1,252
The iPhone 14 is technically the repackaged version of the current iPhone 13 Pro… so basically apple pulled an iPhone 5c. Lolol

Remember when iPhone 5c was basically a recycled iPhone 5 packaged into plastic. Haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: zakarhino and N69AP

Appl3FTW

macrumors 603
Original poster
Nov 15, 2012
5,552
1,252
Not necessarily a bad thing, but look at it at a marketing perspective
 

roland.g

macrumors 604
Apr 11, 2005
7,417
3,165
And yet you didn't call this an iPhone 14 thread, you called it an iPhone 14 Pro Max thread. Who is using deceptive advertising really. click worm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Appl3FTW

snipr125

macrumors 68000
Oct 17, 2015
1,813
2,860
UK
Instead of repackaging the 14 as a 13 Pro, they should of just kept the 13 Pro and 13 Pro Max in the line-up for £100 cheaper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Appl3FTW

YouGoGlenCocoa

macrumors regular
Sep 18, 2013
105
13
is the iphone 14 really on the iphone 13 pro's level? I'm curious about this. Is it just as powerful? Camera is just as good? etc? If so, that's really sad to me.
 

lkalliance

macrumors 65816
Jul 17, 2015
1,362
4,287
The 5c was my favorite iPhone ever!

I think I have this more or less right, but Apple has almost always had a "new hotness" phone alongside a "last year's chip" phone:

5S and 5C
6 and 5S
6S and 6
7 and 6S
8 and 7
X and 8
XS and XC
11 and XS and XC
12 and 11 (and XC?)

It's only recently that they have had two different new-chip models: 12 pro and 12, 13 pro and 13. Having the 14 be last year's chip and the 14 pro be the new chip is a return to what has been normal, not just a copy of the 5S/5c year. What has really changed is the branding. You could look at, say, the year of the 7 and the 6S. Nothing about that branding suggests that the 6S should have the same chip as the 7. Now we have 14 and 14 pro. That they use the same number suggests that they SHOULD have the same chip, and that "pro" should mean other stuff on top of that. And that's what they did the last two years, which frankly surprised me a lot. But "normal" for Apple has historically been selling one with this year's chip, one with last year's.


EDIT: Oops, I mean XR, not XC.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Appl3FTW

Appl3FTW

macrumors 603
Original poster
Nov 15, 2012
5,552
1,252
Instead of repackaging the 14 as a 13 Pro, they should have just kept the 13 Pro and 13 Pro Max in the line-up for £100 cheaper.
Right! But it’s all about marketing. 14 makes it looks and seems like a newer device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snipr125

Appl3FTW

macrumors 603
Original poster
Nov 15, 2012
5,552
1,252
I agree, also get the stainless steel frame instead of aluminum. Probably be some nice discounts to be had on the remaining stock of the 13 pros as well
Exactly. Same thing when the 5c was released, I would’ve opted for a used iPhone 5 because it has the chamfered edges, just overall build quality compared to plastic. Etc.
 

webkit

macrumors 68030
Jan 14, 2021
2,949
2,558
United States
Right! But it’s all about marketing. 14 makes it looks and seems like a newer device.

Well, it is a newer device. The 14 has (over the 13) the emergency satellite connectivity, crash detection, Photonic engine, 5-core GPU, video action mode, etc. All for the same launch price (at least in the U.S.) as the iPhone 13 last year.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.