I have never heard of this - fill me in? TIA ?I’m amazed that there are still people out there who have a hard time understanding what happened in that situation. You’re wrong and your conclusion is wrong. Look it up, it’s been how many years?
I have never heard of this - fill me in? TIA ?I’m amazed that there are still people out there who have a hard time understanding what happened in that situation. You’re wrong and your conclusion is wrong. Look it up, it’s been how many years?
I have never heard of this - fill me in?
Surely it wasn't documented nor mentioned, but still illegal until uncovered. Only then became legal by giving the option to turn it off. People were buying newer phones because they thought their phones were old and crap where in fact, Apple was manipulating the actual phone performanceNot really. Throttling wasn't documented which caused the uproar. It is still there, automatically selected, unless you chose to disable it. Probably not a great idea to disable it.
Thanks for the information and linkIn order to preserve battery life and performance apple implemented a software feature that throttled the cpu to help preserve the battery. It was not documented and so there were several lawsuits and settlements about apple hiding the facts of throttling and battery degridation.
Apple will pay $113 million for throttling older iPhones in new “batterygate” settlement
That’s in addition to an earlier $500 million settlement.www.theverge.com
Good choice. My new 13 seems much smoother & "better" than my 8 Plus (as I stated in post 1), but that doesn't mean the 8 was chopped liver. I had my 8 for nearly 4 years and it was a dependable workhorse.I am still on my 8 plus , for an avg user its still a good phone. I think i will wait for 14 series and then decide if its worthy an upgrade to my 8 plus
Why not just replace the battery for cheaper? How much was the new one? or was there something else wrong with the old phone?Couldn’t agree more. Typing this on my 1st Gen SE now. After the battery on my first one became too unusable, I picked up a second one with better battery health.
Yes i actually referred to this in the post you quoted. But that was a bad battery management thing, not slowing down all phones thing.Well, Apple actually DID this with older phones. Remember the CPU underclocking scandal in older models with a low-health batteries? They stepped back in doing it since that came out.
But then why do some people have (I assume significant) slow down with old devices and others don’t? If it was an OS thing, it should be everybody.
Like I said, for some people it might have been the battery management thing.
That would be iOS 12, which was supposed to be all about performance after the whole iOS 11 debacle.I could be cynical and agree Apple slow down older phones to encourage upgrades, but I my experience Apple have been great at extending the life of older iPhones. There was one release ( Cant remember which ) which was all about optimisation and my older iPhone at the time actually got faster. However eventually it becomes extra work to maintain high performance on older phones and they need to concentrate on new features and the iPhones that support it. I still think the 8 Plus was one of the best ever iPhones. My son has my old one and it's still going strong.
That’s what I said! ?Two words. Battery Capacity… and especially when it goes down past 80% of a normal cycle life
Yeah, Apple throttled phones with batteries that were going bad that would crash if they weren’t throttled. I experienced that myself and I tried turning off the protection when Apple made it an option and my phone would die under heavy loadI have never heard of this - fill me in? TIA ?
Again, you lack nuance. And you’re not a power user and are accepting of reduced performance. What you’ve described as your use case is exactly as I described. You are a Casual user. The performance degradation for the 6S is measurable and documented. It’s NOT my opinion and your disagreement does not change the facts. Your casual use simply indicates that slight performance loss using less intensive apps is acceptable to YOU. And that’s OK. Power users who utilize cpu/gpu intensive apps experience a significant drop in performance which severely handicaps the user experience. Hope this clarifies.I walk every morning and use my 6s+ to stream SOMA FM straight to my BT Aftershokz Aeropex. I still handle text, email and calls with that phone. I also use it a lot to clock in for work (I work from home).
You can disagree, that's fine - but what is happening with your phone is not happening with mine.
For the record, as I stated above, the battery was replaced after six years.
One of the perks of not being addicted to buying the latest tech.Frankly, I didn't think there would be that much of a difference in performance between the old and new phone - but "boy howdy" there sure is!
I have never heard of this - fill me in? TIA ?
Yeah, Apple throttled phones with batteries that were going bad that would crash if they weren’t throttled. I experienced that myself and I tried turning off the protection when Apple made it an option and my phone would die under heavy load
The thing Apple did wrong there was not talking about it. They do that a lot though. It wasn’t malicious, it’s an institutional issue that sometimes works and sometimes causes issues
Throttling wasn't documented which caused the uproar.
I would not describe it as a nosedive. Nonetheless, using apps such as Scanner Pro is an obvious reminder of my iPhone X’s age.I think that people’s slow down are generally the same but if you’re not a power user then the slow down is acceptable or attributed to the age of the phone. Power users are acutely aware when software causes a nosedive in the user experience.