Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iSight Light?
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Re: Is there a mirror for the original pictures?
Not unprofessional considering how much traffic Macrumors gets. This is common practice when a site admin is actively monitoring their servers and sees one site kicking the crap out of not a web page but a specific picture/file/etc.
Macrumors should be asking for permission to link to these images or more appropriately link to the main site.
Usually this behavior is reserved for sites that actually link pictures not just links to pictures but its all the same in the end. I would suggest that a site admin was a tad bit overzealous with the flipping of the code. Probably didn't even look into where the picture was being linked to. In any case you are using another site's pictures\bandwidth to promote you own site. Not as bandwidth intensive but still in the gray area of unprofessional\professional IMHO.
Originally posted by brianwells
The pictures have been pulled and replaced with some other sort of pictures. Rather unprofessional on Griffin's part - they should have simply pulled the pictures.
Thanks!
Not unprofessional considering how much traffic Macrumors gets. This is common practice when a site admin is actively monitoring their servers and sees one site kicking the crap out of not a web page but a specific picture/file/etc.
Macrumors should be asking for permission to link to these images or more appropriately link to the main site.
Usually this behavior is reserved for sites that actually link pictures not just links to pictures but its all the same in the end. I would suggest that a site admin was a tad bit overzealous with the flipping of the code. Probably didn't even look into where the picture was being linked to. In any case you are using another site's pictures\bandwidth to promote you own site. Not as bandwidth intensive but still in the gray area of unprofessional\professional IMHO.
When I clicked on the pictures it just showed a squirrel, and like a baby with pasta on him. Then when I went to the website you guys told me to. It just took me to griffens homepage.
did anyone save a the pics to desktop or in cashe? id rather not look at that deformed thing again.
C'mon now. Somebody has to have taken a screenshot. Especially after they duped us the first time by the sound of this thread,
I was totally not prepared for those pictures. Especially the Helllo Ladies "nature shot"
The kid in the pasta's a cute photo. I think I'll save it and use it in an iCard sometime.
I was totally not prepared for those pictures. Especially the Helllo Ladies "nature shot"
The kid in the pasta's a cute photo. I think I'll save it and use it in an iCard sometime.
Hmmm... Having much luck with that so far?
There's a great site for Apple information that is sure not to waste your time:
http://www.apple.com
The perspective is wrong, that's why it looks photoshopped. I don't know if a light like that is a good idea; you're going to have to look right at it; it will cause horrible red-eye - on both sides of the lens
I'd be interested to find out more about the technology involved in this product. If white LEDs are used, that might be alright, but otherwise, that light would result in severe red eye, I'm thinking - both from a photo perspective and a literal perspective! It would be hard on the eyes to stare right into that thing, wouldn't it? Oh well, however it works, I'm sure the Engineers thought of everything.
I guess we'll just have to keep posted to see when more details are released on the technical aspects of it, and when the release date is. Oh, and the price - that's always important too.
I guess we'll just have to keep posted to see when more details are released on the technical aspects of it, and when the release date is. Oh, and the price - that's always important too.
... If white LEDs are used, that might be alright, but otherwise, that light would result in severe red eye, I'm thinking - both from a photo perspective and a literal perspective!...
i don't see how this would cause red-eye ('photo perspective') as it is not a flash, but rather a 'hot-light'-always on.
anyway, don't have an isight, but i think this is a brilliant product idea. go griffin, hope it's true.
i don't see how this would cause red-eye ('photo perspective') as it is not a flash, but rather a 'hot-light'-always on.
anyway, don't have an isight, but i think this is a brilliant product idea. go griffin, hope it's true.
I think the idea is great. The light does not have to be really bright like a photo flash. Most of the time we sit with some light coming from behind us, so our isight images may appear a little dark. So for those of us that want our friends to see how big our nose really is - a little light thrown on the front of our face from the iSight would just enhance things a little.
IMHO
IMHO
notice the cable running off the light itself (not for the camera)
this thing needs juice!
Great idea tho - and the soft white light will be quite flattering!
Also - the light will be too close for red-eye - most likely you'll see a reflection of the light itself - an old movie trick i learned in film school.
this thing needs juice!
Great idea tho - and the soft white light will be quite flattering!
Also - the light will be too close for red-eye - most likely you'll see a reflection of the light itself - an old movie trick i learned in film school.
How much light would it have ?
Doesn't look like much.
I use my iSight every day and see no great use for this thing, if you sit in a well light room or just have some good lamps near by. But if it indeed is coming and if it works well, I might buy it.
But I'm getting this stand for the iSight.
http://www.macmice.com/sightflex.html
Doesn't look like much.
I use my iSight every day and see no great use for this thing, if you sit in a well light room or just have some good lamps near by. But if it indeed is coming and if it works well, I might buy it.
But I'm getting this stand for the iSight.
http://www.macmice.com/sightflex.html
I dug this up.
http://www.ccrane.com/white_led_flashlight.asp
Seems the light is can be quite bright and power consumption is low. Maybe the ring would have 4 smaller LEDs. Like this:
O
/ \
O O
\ /
O
Sorry my ring looks like a diamond.
DOH! It doesn't even look like a diamond. My 1337 formatting was not preserved
http://www.ccrane.com/white_led_flashlight.asp
Seems the light is can be quite bright and power consumption is low. Maybe the ring would have 4 smaller LEDs. Like this:
O
/ \
O O
\ /
O
Sorry my ring looks like a diamond.
DOH! It doesn't even look like a diamond. My 1337 formatting was not preserved