slightly said:
I'd just like to remind people that you never really own anything, it's all rented.
You buy a TV? You use it for three years and then replace it. You just paid $20 a month to rent it for a while.
You buy a house? You use it for twenty years and then move (or die). You paid $500 a month to rent that place.
Macs, music downloads and everything else on the planet work in exactly the same way. Don't kid yourself that you ever "own something forever".
Matt
Houses are definitely bought and sold. Yes, you use it for an indefinite period of time, at which time you sell it. Therein lies the fundamental difference between a sale and a rent or lease: the time of "selling", and, thus, the appreciated per-time cost of use of the item, is determined by you, the buyer, as opposed to either pre-determined or determined by the seller. Plus, to belabor the obvious point, the "cost" of the home is largely offset by the "profit" of selling the house (which, as a renter, of course you don't get). Fundamentally, a "buyer" has significantly more rights than a "renter", and generally also tends to pay less over the life of the equipment than the renter. That's the way life is.
As for music, fundamentally the way I view music, and I don't think I'm alone here, doesn't gel with a renter model. Music is one of the barometers of life. It's a great way to bring back memories, hearing a random song that hearkens back to when you were a kid. The memories trickle in, or they flood in, making life all that much richer. If I "own" my music (technically, if I own the rights to play my music), then I know that I'll be able to listen to the song I'm listening to right now, when I'm 80 years old, and it will bring back memories the same way the Chattanooga Choo Choo brings back memories for my grandparents. If I "rent" the music, my access to that music is far from certain. In fact, as a renter, I know there are processes in place specifically to keep me from listening to that music when I'm older -- both intentional, in the case that I stop paying the rental bills, and unintentional in the case that the rental outfit closes shop or there is a legal snafu which forces them to stop broadcasting a certain song or whatever. Chances that I'll have access to the songs I know and love today, when I'm older? Not so great.
Fundamentally, it's a bad idea to rent music. I've known five people who have tried music rental services, and they've all stopped their subscriptions after only a few months because they realized they'd never be able to "have" that music, and that they were severely limitted in how they could use that music *today*.
The rental outfits aren't making a profit today. Their losses are "narrowing", which may have been good enough in the dot-com bubble, but it doesn't sail a ship of cheese today. Narrowing losses are still losses, and projections of losses narrowing for years into the future means they won't be making a
profit any time soon, if ever. Plus, from a trends perspective, I see a whole lot more future growth in music ownership; storage space has a lot of head room, in all areas from ultra-portable to ultra-non-portable, while network transmission bandwidth has been relatively stagnant for many years and looks to remain that way for a good amount of time to come. Finally, historically, rental schemes tend to have a greatly-increased probability of success with "young" technologies than with "old" technologies (would you rent a phone today?); if it hasn't taken off yet, it's chances are diminishing with each passing day.