Hey Folks,
So we're producting a print brochure for work and one of the pages is a feature on our website. Originally I had done a fun screen shot with a skier jumping off the webpage and such. It was quite beautiful really, but as per our normal operations all the life has been sucked out of the page(not that I'm bitter).
But anyways as per the title of this thread now our GM is asking that the entire browser window be present on the page. Aside from the fact that I personally find this ugly I'm wondering what the legal implications of reproducing the IE interface is? I mean I assume everything is copy righted and this would be a no-no but I'm just wondering if anyone has heard of a case where M$ has ever acted on it?
Yes, I realize this is a bad idea but unfortunatly there's no reasoning with our GM at times.
So we're producting a print brochure for work and one of the pages is a feature on our website. Originally I had done a fun screen shot with a skier jumping off the webpage and such. It was quite beautiful really, but as per our normal operations all the life has been sucked out of the page(not that I'm bitter).
But anyways as per the title of this thread now our GM is asking that the entire browser window be present on the page. Aside from the fact that I personally find this ugly I'm wondering what the legal implications of reproducing the IE interface is? I mean I assume everything is copy righted and this would be a no-no but I'm just wondering if anyone has heard of a case where M$ has ever acted on it?
Yes, I realize this is a bad idea but unfortunatly there's no reasoning with our GM at times.