Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

soquickwitit

macrumors member
Original poster
Jul 24, 2007
44
0
Hey all. I'm looking to make the jump to mac!! I'm basically wondering which model to buy. Macbook or macbook pro??

Heres my interests

I want to basically use if for video encoding. HI def and bluray files to mp4. and i want top speed!! Does the graphics card accelerate this? or ram? please help

apple is telling me to get the macbook pro. i'm not sure, so i thought i'd ask you guys.

please reply. thx
 

McGiord

macrumors 601
Oct 5, 2003
4,558
290
Dark Castle
To get the fastest one you better go with the MBP.

Also the Turbo H264 from El Gato may help you do that mp4 video conversion on a faster rate.
________
GSX-R600
 
Last edited:

soquickwitit

macrumors member
Original poster
Jul 24, 2007
44
0
The Macbook will do this fine the software doesn't even use the GPU so if you want to you can save a few bucks.

Well these bluray files are huge, and can take awhile.

Does the graphics card make a difference in conversion speed? does ram? does processor? please help. thx
 

Matek

macrumors 6502a
Jun 6, 2007
535
1
Graphics card doesn't have anything to do with it (better ones have hardware decoding support, but rarely encoding).

Ram does play a certain role, but isn't that important really. Besides, you can get 4 gigabytes for 70 usd and IMHO it would be dumb not to get it while it's still cheap, regardless of what laptop you buy. They both use the same ram so it's a tie.

It all comes down to the CPU. Fastest Macbook is 2.2 GHz, fastest MBP is 2.6 GHz. The price difference is huge, the cheapest MBP with a 2.6 CPU costs more than twice as much as the cheapest MB with a 2.2 CPU. An 18% faster CPU isn't worth it IMHO.

Of course the MBP is much better in many other aspects, but if you judge strictly by encoding power, the numbers simply don't add up.
 

soquickwitit

macrumors member
Original poster
Jul 24, 2007
44
0
Graphics card doesn't have anything to do with it (better ones have hardware decoding support, but rarely encoding).

Ram does play a certain role, but isn't that important really. Besides, you can get 4 gigabytes for 70 usd and IMHO it would be dumb not to get it while it's still cheap, regardless of what laptop you buy. They use the same ram so it's a tie.

It all comes down to the CPU. Fastest Macbook is 2.2 GHz, fastest MBP is 2.6 GHz. The price difference is huge, the cheapest MBP with a 2.6 CPU costs more than twice as much as the cheapest MB with a 2.2 CPU. An 18% faster CPU isn't worth it IMHO.

Of course the MBP is much better in many other aspects, but if you judge strictly by encoding power, the numbers simply don't add up.

so should i go to macbook?
 

MacDann

macrumors 6502a
And as someone mentioned earlier, if you're doing a lot of encoding, consider a hardware approach like Elgato's Turbo H264. For what it costs it would be worth it, considering the performance boost you would get from it.

MacDann
 

soquickwitit

macrumors member
Original poster
Jul 24, 2007
44
0
Graphics card doesn't have anything to do with it (better ones have hardware decoding support, but rarely encoding).

Ram does play a certain role, but isn't that important really. Besides, you can get 4 gigabytes for 70 usd and IMHO it would be dumb not to get it while it's still cheap, regardless of what laptop you buy. They both use the same ram so it's a tie.

It all comes down to the CPU. Fastest Macbook is 2.2 GHz, fastest MBP is 2.6 GHz. The price difference is huge, the cheapest MBP with a 2.6 CPU costs more than twice as much as the cheapest MB with a 2.2 CPU. An 18% faster CPU isn't worth it IMHO.

Of course the MBP is much better in many other aspects, but if you judge strictly by encoding power, the numbers simply don't add up.

Where do you get the Ram memory for that cheap? thx
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.