Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Miguel Cunha

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Sep 14, 2012
387
102
Braga, Portugal
Hello!

Apple states that the Mac Studio’s maximum continuous power (draw) is 370 W.
I assume this refers to a top specked M1 Ultra.
Does anyone know the continuous power requirements of an M1 Max 32c GPU with 64GB unified memory?

Thank you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: tevion5

l0stl0rd

macrumors 6502
Jul 25, 2009
467
410
About half I would guess as it is half the “chip” or perhaps less Anandtech got the Chip to draw a 120 max while testing it the 16”.
 

MarkC426

macrumors 68040
May 14, 2008
3,587
2,009
UK
It would all depend on what your doing.
CPU intensive tasks like rendering etc will obviously use more power.
Looking at the tech specs, I would say 370 is for top spec ultra model.

At a guess I would say general use no more than 150-200w (Edit after post above: maybe even less). Which is less than just my GPU in my MacPro.......o_O

edit: found this

httpswww.apple.comenvironmentpdfproductsdesktopsMac_Studio_PER_March2022.pdf.png
 
Last edited:

Spanky Deluxe

macrumors demi-god
Mar 17, 2005
5,283
1,752
London, UK
I finally plugged in my power meter to my current 2009 Mac Pro that my Studio Max will be replacing. I leave this machine on 24/7 as I run some stuff that needs to be accessible all the time and what is crazy is that, if those figures are right, I could run my M1 Ultra Mac Studio at full load and it would still be using ~200W less than my current Mac Pro does at 'idle' (well just under 10% load). That's insane. To put it into perspective, based on the new energy prices that suppliers are putting rates to here, in the UK, drawing 200W a year 24/7 is almost £500 worth of electricity. That's quite a saving!
 

dfelix

macrumors regular
Jul 13, 2011
112
141
I finally plugged in my power meter to my current 2009 Mac Pro that my Studio Max will be replacing. I leave this machine on 24/7 as I run some stuff that needs to be accessible all the time and what is crazy is that, if those figures are right, I could run my M1 Ultra Mac Studio at full load and it would still be using ~200W less than my current Mac Pro does at 'idle' (well just under 10% load). That's insane. To put it into perspective, based on the new energy prices that suppliers are putting rates to here, in the UK, drawing 200W a year 24/7 is almost £500 worth of electricity. That's quite a saving!
Mac studio will pay for itself just in power savings, impressive. I'll be upgrading from a 2012 i7 mini, its noise is really starting to drive me mad
 
  • Like
Reactions: uller6

Chancha

macrumors 68020
Mar 19, 2014
2,124
1,913
I watched many user reviews, the highest I have seen is someone running Blender, he even has a wattage metre in through the wall socket so it is the total consumption not just the number reported by software on the SoC package. The metre never exceeded 140W and I believe it is the stock Ultra with 48 graphic cores.

That said, I struggle to accept this is the optimized final state of the Studio as it would be silly to ship a 370W PSU when it only draws 140W under load, even including Thunderbolt peripherals it is ridiculously underutilized.
 

cpnotebook80

macrumors 65816
Feb 4, 2007
1,210
524
Toronto
A new review video is out on power consumption and thermals by max tech of the ultra and seems apple is limiting power for gpu etc.
 

MarkC426

macrumors 68040
May 14, 2008
3,587
2,009
UK
I finally plugged in my power meter to my current 2009 Mac Pro that my Studio Max will be replacing. I leave this machine on 24/7 as I run some stuff that needs to be accessible all the time and what is crazy is that, if those figures are right, I could run my M1 Ultra Mac Studio at full load and it would still be using ~200W less than my current Mac Pro does at 'idle' (well just under 10% load). That's insane. To put it into perspective, based on the new energy prices that suppliers are putting rates to here, in the UK, drawing 200W a year 24/7 is almost £500 worth of electricity. That's quite a saving!
For those of us (ME) who can't get our heads around watts-hours-cost etc.....:p
In layman's terms how much would 200w an hour cost you (in the UK)...?

I just looked at my UPS readout (with cMP and 27" monitor and TM drive connected) shows 195w at idle (although my Mac is not on 24/7 like yours).
 
  • Like
Reactions: OS X Dude

hugodrax

macrumors 65816
Jul 15, 2007
1,221
626
A new review video is out on power consumption and thermals by max tech of the ultra and seems apple is limiting power for gpu etc.
Great video, that and the disassemble video. Subbed. finally someone made the effort to do some good testing. Interesting results.
 

eddie_ducking

macrumors member
Oct 18, 2021
95
118
For those of us (ME) who can't get our heads around watts-hours-cost etc.....:p
In layman's terms how much would 200w an hour cost you (in the UK)...?

I just looked at my UPS readout (with cMP and 27" monitor and TM drive connected) shows 195w at idle (although my Mac is not on 24/7 like yours).

we've just been informed that our estimated electricity bill is going to go up by about £1100 next year. I bought a second M1 Mac Mini back in August, purely on the basis of its lower power requirements compared to my old Mac Pro 5,1 (3.46GHz 12 core, 96GB RAM, 1TB PCI NVME) and it offering about the same processing power. The reduction in consumption I calculated at around £500 per year, paying for the £589 refurbed 8Gb Mini in not too long at all.

That was based on £0.172/kWh in August last year, but it seems that £0.28 is going to be the average in 2022.

Using
https://www.omnicalculator.com/everyday-life/electricity-cost , 200W @ £0.172 for 24/7/365 usage is £301.55 per year, using £0.28 is £490.90. Oh and I think VAT has to be added on top (so +20%)

My Pro was using around 450W when being fully exploited, the Mini more difficult to tell due to the small number, but around 25W, saving me (at the higher current price) £1,043.15 per year (for no real loss of performance)
 

Spanky Deluxe

macrumors demi-god
Mar 17, 2005
5,283
1,752
London, UK
For those of us (ME) who can't get our heads around watts-hours-cost etc.....:p
In layman's terms how much would 200w an hour cost you (in the UK)...?

I just looked at my UPS readout (with cMP and 27" monitor and TM drive connected) shows 195w at idle (although my Mac is not on 24/7 like yours).
Sure! So to work out the cost savings of 200 watts over a year, I need to combine it with the kWh cost of my energy supplier. I recently got an email from my supplier (Bulb UK) to say my peak electricity cost was going up to 33.100 pence per kWh and my night rate to 19.793 pence per kWh. I looked it up and it looks like night rate usually applies for 10 hours and day rate for 14 hours. Using these figures, I can get an average rate:

((33.100 x 14) + (19.793 x 10)) / 24 = 27.555 pence per kWh

The unit kWh means a power draw of 1 kW (or 1000 watts) for 1 hour so using this, I can work out the daily cost of drawing 200W for 24 hours:

(200/1000) x 27.555 x 24 = 132.264 pence per day

Then I just convert to pounds (£1.3264) and multiply by 365 to get an annual amount in pounds:

1.3264 x 365 = £482.76

So if the Mac Studio reduces my 24x7 power draw by 200W, it’ll save me almost £500 a year. I think in practice it’ll be a fair chunk higher than that as 200W less assumes it’s almost peak load. It could be more like 250W. Coupled with a new monitor to replace my 30” ACD, I might end up with up to 350W less draw 24x7 which would be over £800!
 

ronm99

macrumors 6502
Jan 13, 2012
334
83
For those of us (ME) who can't get our heads around watts-hours-cost etc.....:p
In layman's terms how much would 200w an hour cost you (in the UK)...?

I just looked at my UPS readout (with cMP and 27" monitor and TM drive connected) shows 195w at idle (although my Mac is not on 24/7 like yours).
Electricity is generally charged per kilowatt-hour, so 5 hours at 200w is one kWh. if you left it on 24/7, that would be 365*24/5 = 1752 kWh per year. Avg UK electricity rates are apparently 17.2p / kWh, which would work out to about £300 per year.
 

OS X Dude

macrumors 65816
Jun 30, 2007
1,132
614
UK
we've just been informed that our estimated electricity bill is going to go up by about £1100 next year. I bought a second M1 Mac Mini back in August, purely on the basis of its lower power requirements compared to my old Mac Pro 5,1 (3.46GHz 12 core, 96GB RAM, 1TB PCI NVME) and it offering about the same processing power. The reduction in consumption I calculated at around £500 per year, paying for the £589 refurbed 8Gb Mini in not too long at all.

That was based on £0.172/kWh in August last year, but it seems that £0.28 is going to be the average in 2022.

Using
https://www.omnicalculator.com/everyday-life/electricity-cost , 200W @ £0.172 for 24/7/365 usage is £301.55 per year, using £0.28 is £490.90. Oh and I think VAT has to be added on top (so +20%)

My Pro was using around 450W when being fully exploited, the Mini more difficult to tell due to the small number, but around 25W, saving me (at the higher current price) £1,043.15 per year (for no real loss of performance)

VAT is 5% on energy and Rishi is looking to cut it in the Spring Budget, according to many news sources today. Here's hoping! I'm locked-in until December, by which time this whole thing had best have blown over...
 

eddie_ducking

macrumors member
Oct 18, 2021
95
118
VAT is 5% on energy and Rishi is looking to cut it in the Spring Budget, according to many news sources today. Here's hoping! I'm locked-in until December, by which time this whole thing had best have blown over...

ah, thanks for that, didn't realise, also wasn't sure if the average prices I was finding online were inc or ex VAT

To answer the OP, I've only got an Eve Smart Plug monitoring power usage, so it's not exactly accurate or responsive, but my total usage has gone up from around 280-300W to 370-390W after plugging my base Studio Ultra in and running 4 Handbrake threads on it (still playing and finding out what I can do with it), though just to cloud the issue slightly, I also started other single Handbrake threads on a couple of M1 Minis so the increase isn't solely down to the Studio Ultra
 

Miguel Cunha

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Sep 14, 2012
387
102
Braga, Portugal
I struggle to accept this is the optimized final state of the Studio as it would be silly to ship a 370W PSU when it only draws 140W under load, even including Thunderbolt peripherals it is ridiculously underutilized.
I like to think that Apple learnt with their previous miscalculations and are preventing to put themselves in another thermal corner, as they did with the 2013 trash can Mac Pro.
This being true, we could hope for the Mac Studio to have room to evolve and not to be simply a niche ephemeral product.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tevion5

dugbug

macrumors 68000
Aug 23, 2008
1,873
1,960
Somewhere in Florida
I watched many user reviews, the highest I have seen is someone running Blender, he even has a wattage metre in through the wall socket so it is the total consumption not just the number reported by software on the SoC package. The metre never exceeded 140W and I believe it is the stock Ultra with 48 graphic cores.

That said, I struggle to accept this is the optimized final state of the Studio as it would be silly to ship a 370W PSU when it only draws 140W under load, even including Thunderbolt peripherals it is ridiculously underutilized.


Im far from a power guy and want the theory of underpowered studio to be correct and patched ;) but the studio needs to be able to power all the USB-C ports adequately (15W each?): 90 Watts
plus 5 each for the two USB 3.0? So that's 100W under load. This reaches 240W.

Someone that knows this stuff please correct me.
 

Miguel Cunha

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Sep 14, 2012
387
102
Braga, Portugal
Im far from a power guy and want the theory of underpowered studio to be correct and patched ;) but the studio needs to be able to power all the USB-C ports adequately (15W each?): 90 Watts
plus 5 each for the two USB 3.0? So that's 100W under load. This reaches 240W.

Someone that knows this stuff please correct me.
Interesting and pertinent point.
There are still 130 W left to reach 370.
 

Chancha

macrumors 68020
Mar 19, 2014
2,124
1,913
Let’s say the giant fans take 20W (they shouldn’t but whatever). 20-40W of heat efficiency loss to the whole heatsink. Still under 300W.

I remember TB3 does have a 15W per port PD spec, but that was years ago, don’t know if this is updated for TB4 or USB4.

The other explaination is if this chassis is designed for next gen Apple Silicon as well. Kind of like how the high tier 24” iMac with 2 fans which is almost never needed for M1. Well there is a news thread on front page saying the Studio Display has 64GB SSD but only using 2GB….. maybe this is how modern Apple rolls. Build and ship more than you need, just because. lol.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.