Appleinsider describes a possible new 1U rackmount enclosure with "3 drive bays, as opposed to 4, separated by two circular openings on the front of the chasis."
Originally posted by backspinner
I don't think the "walk away" security feature is used widely. More important are the mounting problems smaller shops have with this beast. A two or three U system would be nice.
I'd guess they could get more in the 3 SATA bays. 3x250GB SATA drives = 750GB > 4x180GB = 720GB in current XServe.Originally posted by dstorey
teo circular air intakes would look powerful anyway. Wonder if the move to serial ATA would mean they can get drive sizes for the tree bays to be compirable to what the current 4 drive bay model can get to?
Originally posted by Rincewind42
Somehow it wouldn't surprise me if it only had 3 external bays and one fixed bay internally. After all, it's not like on a current XServe you can eject the drive bay that the OS is running on and keep going, so by keeping one bay internal they can reduce that issue. The only downside is that it would reduce the "walk away" security, that is at the end of the day shutdown and take the startup disk with you.
Originally posted by ColdZero
Serial ATA drives are no larger in capacity than PATA drives. If anything, PATA has larger capacities and is much easier to find than SATA because of its marketshare. (For Now) Also, Apple uses a different connector in the XServe to provide hotswap capabilities. SATA or PATA, they still have to go through this connector anyways making the connection size savings of SATA useless. It would piss a lot of people off if they changed this, that would make all the past XServes unable to use the new modules.
Right.. Apple sells long term support contracts for xServe so It is obvious that they would stop manufacturing upgrade and replacement parts for them. I mean, Apple enterprise customers probably just expect that when they call in for Apple to honor their support contract, Apple will just say "Oh, sorry, we stopped making parts for that model".Originally posted by ColdZero
Also, Apple uses a different connector in the XServe to provide hotswap capabilities. SATA or PATA, they still have to go through this connector anyways making the connection size savings of SATA useless. It would piss a lot of people off if they changed this, that would make all the past XServes unable to use the new modules. I'd have a feeling that Apple would suddenly stop selling the old modules as well making past xserves unable to take on more storage. .
Somehow I doubt that Apple will keep PATA in the Xserve line after putting it in the PowerMac line. While the savings on connector size may be irrelevant in that format, the fact that SATA is a faster protocol makes it more than a match for the Xserve.
Right.. Apple sells long term support contracts for xServe so It is obvious that they would stop manufacturing upgrade and replacement parts for them. I mean, Apple enterprise customers probably just expect that when they call in for Apple to honor their support contract, Apple will just say "Oh, sorry, we stopped making parts for that model".
right.
BTW.. Let's just forget the enterprise support that Apple is legally bound to provide.. when has Apple ever said 'sorry, you have to buy a new computer because we don't support that anymore'? Call up an Apple service center and ask them what it would cost to replace a first Gen G4 motherboard. You won't like the price, but you can get the part installed.
saying that Apple would screw over enterprise customers just when they are trying to make inroads into the enterprise is silly FUD. Apple doesn't treat normal customers like this and No vendor treats server buyers like this. I could buy parts for an IBM 486 server if I wanted to... from IBM. Apple isn't dumb enough to be that clueless about enterprise support.
I have a first generation Xserve, and Apple screwed me over this way.Originally posted by ffakr
Right.. Apple sells long term support contracts for xServe so It is obvious that they would stop manufacturing upgrade and replacement parts for them. I mean, Apple enterprise customers probably just expect that when they call in for Apple to honor their support contract, Apple will just say "Oh, sorry, we stopped making parts for that model".
right.
(snip)
Apple isn't dumb enough to be that clueless about enterprise support.
They better not make it a full depth rack mount, since that doesn't fit in most cheap racks and normal closets...Originally posted by Toe Sure, a G5 Xserve is long overdue... but so is a consumer rack-mount server.
Originally posted by Toe
Sure, a G5 Xserve is long overdue... but so is a consumer rack-mount server.
Sorry, but yes this does sound stupid.Originally posted by Toe
Sure, a G5 Xserve is long overdue... but so is a consumer rack-mount server.
Sound stupid? Not with Panther it doesn't. Panther supports multiple logins, Wifi, Bluetooth, and network login. Add these together, and you get an awesome home scenario.
You put your iServe in the closet, plug your high-speed internet connection into it and never look at it again.