Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

macmanmatty

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 10, 2005
237
0
(x,y)
I have spent the past few weeks looking at every affordable good quality AD/da converter. I after much reading of reviews and forums postings I have lowered it down to these "afforidable options" (around $1500 ) and wondered how they all stacked up in terms of conversion quality.

Fireface 800
http://www.rme-audio.com/english/firewire/ff800.htm

Metric Halo 2882
http://www.mhlabs.com/metric_halo/products/mio/2882/

Metric Halo ULN-2
http://www.mhlabs.com/metric_halo/products/mio/uln2

LynxTwo "C"
http://www.lynxstudio.com/lynxtwo.html

Motu Ultralite
http://www.motu.com/products/motuaudio/ultralite/

Rosetta 200
http://www.apogeedigital.com/products/rosetta200.php



I also looked at the lynx aurora but it looks like you have you have to have aes16 to make it work with a mac and buy additional i/o cables. (correct me if i'm wrong)

Also if you have any da/ad conveter that you think i should consider adding to the list your opion would be welcome.


Thanks

Macmanmatty
 

zimv20

macrumors 601
Jul 18, 2002
4,402
11
toronto
there are some good pieces there, but you're all over the place wrt # of channels. what are your needs?

also -- if you need only 2 channels of d/a, check out the benchmark dac-1. i like mine lots. (my other converter is an apogee rosetta 800, fwiw).
 

macmanmatty

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 10, 2005
237
0
(x,y)
I would like to have at lest 4 channels of A/D (more is always nice) and 2 channels of D/A. But I would take less a/d if the convters in one of 2 channel units are REALLY amazing and blow the others away.
 

zimv20

macrumors 601
Jul 18, 2002
4,402
11
toronto
just my personal opinion, but i'd put apogee and metric halo in a group above presonus and MOTU. i don't have any experience with the lynx.

4 is kind of a tough number, as most converters go from 2 to 8. i think the one floating to the top is the 8228, as it's quality and gives you more channels than you need atm.

there's a lot of love for MH over at the osxaudio hardware forum.

edit: btw, your location is cracking me up.
 

zimv20

macrumors 601
Jul 18, 2002
4,402
11
toronto
also -- i don't know which preamps you have. if you don't have any, or they're of medium quality, then you may want to consider the uln-2. i haven't used it myself, but i've heard some amazing location binaural stuff recorded with it (using earthworks mics, natch).
 

macmanmatty

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 10, 2005
237
0
(x,y)
zimv20 said:
also -- i don't know which preamps you have. if you don't have any, or they're of medium quality, then you may want to consider the uln-2. i haven't used it myself, but i've heard some amazing location binaural stuff recorded with it (using earthworks mics, natch).

would the unl-2's pre be better than the rnp which I currenty own
 

zimv20

macrumors 601
Jul 18, 2002
4,402
11
toronto
macmanmatty said:
would the unl-2's pre be better than the rnp which I currenty own
as i've not used the uln-2 pre's myself, i can't say for sure (i do have an rnp, which i like a lot). an engineer friend of mine who owns both likes the uln-2 pre's better.

i had to spend a lot more than i spent on the rnp to get something better, fwiw.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.