http://www.insanely-great.com/news.php?id=1026
G gopher macrumors 65816 Original poster Mar 31, 2002 1,475 0 Maryland, USA Sep 30, 2002 #1 http://www.insanely-great.com/news.php?id=1026
Hemingray macrumors 68030 Jan 9, 2002 2,926 37 Ha ha haaa! Sep 30, 2002 #2 Yes, you read that that right -- it takes over 13,000 more 2GHz AMD processors to equal the work-unit crunching power of "just" 32K PowerBooks! Click to expand... I'm a little surprised by that, that's pretty impressive. Now if we could only match them on their superficial MHz terms then we'd do more than blow the competition out of the water!
Yes, you read that that right -- it takes over 13,000 more 2GHz AMD processors to equal the work-unit crunching power of "just" 32K PowerBooks! Click to expand... I'm a little surprised by that, that's pretty impressive. Now if we could only match them on their superficial MHz terms then we'd do more than blow the competition out of the water!
B bidge macrumors 6502 Jul 16, 2002 286 0 New Zealand Sep 30, 2002 #3 Cool, now if we find one more site that also has this information we'll have one wicked case
alex_ant macrumors 68020 Feb 5, 2002 2,473 0 All up in your bidness Sep 30, 2002 #4 Correction: RC5 tests show Macs much faster... at RC5 tests