Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

filmbuff

macrumors 6502a
Jan 5, 2011
967
364
Yeah pretty much. Unfortunately there's not really any ios software that can use all that power.
 

impulse462

macrumors 68020
Jun 3, 2009
2,089
2,874
this is not the case at all, and i'm not sure why exactly its being parroted by people on this forum. these scores are from a synthetic benchmark which test burst speed and they are quite literally in no way representative of real world performance comparing the intel cpus and the A series chips.

there are a plethora of examples comparing same intel cpus in different laptops from different manufactureres where the "best" performing computer doesn't necessarily have the highest geekbench score.

this isn't to say the A series chips aren't powerful, of course they are, but it is not "pretty much" the case that the phone, which runs a stripped down version of mac os as a mobile OS, running one app at a time is more powerful than a laptop which runs a full desktop OS capable of better multitasking and various application support
 
  • Like
Reactions: duervo and KashKave

jerryk

macrumors 604
Nov 3, 2011
7,418
4,206
SF Bay Area
That is measuring one aspect of performance. But unless you run synthetic benchmarks all day it does not matter a lot, expecially when crossing OSes and applications.
 

Michael Scrip

macrumors 604
Mar 4, 2011
7,931
12,487
NC
It's already amazing what kind of performance we can get from a tiny chip in a small handheld phone.

So imagine if Apple designed a new ARM chip specifically for a laptop... a device with a large body and a huge battery!

That's when it will get really exciting. :p
 

UBS28

macrumors 68030
Oct 2, 2012
2,893
2,340
ARM is crap because it has no software to run. My 12.9 iPad Pro is just a toy for this very reason.

AMD > Intel & ARM.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.