Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Doug183

macrumors member
Original poster
Mar 3, 2009
41
36
I have:
-2018 Intel Mac mini, which is a T2 Mac.
- Its has a 256 GB Internal non upgradable SSD which is now too full and there isn't a lot I can delete - Adobe Apps and Parallels and my user folder take up a lot of the space. Plus all that Apple "System Data" that I can not seem to delete (58.49 GBs).
- Running Monterey 12.5.1
- I just bought a Samsung 1TB external SSD that will connect via USB-C.

So should I just run the entire system off the external Samsung or should I just move the User folder?
(Long ago, I ran with a user folder on an external bigger drive, but at times found it slightly buggy.)

Looking for real world experience with either set up.

Thanks
Doug
 

Fishrrman

macrumors Penryn
Feb 20, 2009
28,444
12,560
You don't want to move the home folder or the OS from the internal drive.

REASON WHY:
Speed.
It's that simple.

I, too, have a 2018 Mini (I'm typing this reply on it).
Using BlackMagic Speed Test, I get reads of 2,600MBps from the internal drive.

The maximum speeds you will see from a Samsung drive:
- If it's USB3 (such as t5), you'll get reads around 430MBps.
- If it's USB3.1 gen2 (such as t7), you'll get reads around 830MBps.

Compare that to what you get from the internal drive.
Do you really want to "set the machine back" like that?

Your problem is that you may have TOO MUCH DATA on the internal SSD.
You need to "move off" some things (such as your libraries of pics, videos, etc.) to the external SSD.

BUT... leave the OS, apps, your [basic] account ON the internal drive.

If you use time machine (I have NEVER used it), you need to get rid of "local snapshots" which eat up space behind-the-scenes.

With careful "pruning", you can clean up the internal drive and keep using it -- again, because of SPEED.

Also be aware:
If you move files to an external drive, now you have ANOTHER drive that needs to be BACKED UP.
So that may involve getting a second backup drive, as well.
 

Doug183

macrumors member
Original poster
Mar 3, 2009
41
36
You don't want to move the home folder or the OS from the internal drive.

REASON WHY:
Speed.
It's that simple.

I, too, have a 2018 Mini (I'm typing this reply on it).
Using BlackMagic Speed Test, I get reads of 2,600MBps from the internal drive.

The maximum speeds you will see from a Samsung drive:
- If it's USB3 (such as t5), you'll get reads around 430MBps.
- If it's USB3.1 gen2 (such as t7), you'll get reads around 830MBps.

Compare that to what you get from the internal drive.
Do you really want to "set the machine back" like that?

Your problem is that you may have TOO MUCH DATA on the internal SSD.
You need to "move off" some things (such as your libraries of pics, videos, etc.) to the external SSD.

BUT... leave the OS, apps, your [basic] account ON the internal drive.

If you use time machine (I have NEVER used it), you need to get rid of "local snapshots" which eat up space behind-the-scenes.

With careful "pruning", you can clean up the internal drive and keep using it -- again, because of SPEED.

Also be aware:
If you move files to an external drive, now you have ANOTHER drive that needs to be BACKED UP.
So that may involve getting a second backup drive, as well.
Good points. I will see what I can move. The real issue is I shouldn't have cheaped out years ago.
 

rpmurray

macrumors 68020
Feb 21, 2017
2,148
4,319
Back End of Beyond
You have Thunderbolt 3 ports on the mini so you could get a decent external Thunderbolt enclosure and NVMe drive and get some real hustle from the drive, not the puny speeds you'll see from from USB 3 (of any flavor).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alameda

ItsAShaunParty

macrumors member
Jun 20, 2013
44
5
I'm attempting the same thing as we speak. I have an earlier post about it.

Here's what I wrote:

I am on a iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2020)
3.8 GHz 8-Core Intel Core i7 72 Gb Ram
512 GB HD
Running Monterey 12.5.1

I bought this iMac with the intention to replace the HD, not realizing that Apple was soldering this one down. I didn't realize that it was near impossible until it was too late. It's been a few years and the HD is super crowded. I am left with a single choice: I am moving my home folder to an external.

I've read some other posts. A lot of people try to talk others out of this. I wish I could avoid it, but right now, I can't. So I want to make sure I do it in the safest possible manner.

How does this sound:
  1. Log into a user account with admin access (not the account I want to transfer)
  2. Using Carbon Copy, I copied the user folder of the account I want to transfer (/Users/[USERNAME]) to a new location on an external
  3. Open System Preferences
  4. Go to Users & Groups
  5. Click the padlock and authenticate
  6. Right (or control) click on the username to move and select "Advanced Options.."
  7. Click on the "Choose..." button and point it to the new location
  8. My next step was going to be to delete the information from /Users/[USERNAME]
I logged in and everything seemed fine. Until I received an iMessage from my brother. Messages did not recognize his phone number.

I'll admit, this isn't cause for panic. Except I started to think, "What else could be wrong!?" I didn't want to start to make changes to a home folder in a new location only to find out that some things didn't transfer and have to start to try to clean that mess. So I switched it back. And here I am.

That was a few weeks ago. Recently I tried again and some files didn't show. I'm starting suspect Carbon Copy as a culprit.

Any ideas?

And I hope this helps.
 

danano

macrumors newbie
Dec 3, 2017
27
18
Moving User spaces away from the System has worked fine for many years and through many versions of macOS. Unfortunately, it seems a bug was introduced with maOS 12.5.1 which interfere with moved User spaces. One known symptom of the bug is a user whose user space has been relocated cannot log in directly. The breath and depth of issues caused by this bug are not known, as discussed in Apple Discussions.

Unable to login with user folder on external drive since 12.5.1 upgrade

This new bug appears to allow what appears to be the same path name tin different places to have different functions. It may be that the new bug is only present in code for Intel processors (not in code for Apple Silicon).

Please provide feedback to Apple. I am concerned that with release of macOS Ventura soon, bugs in macOS Monterey will receive less attention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ItsAShaunParty

ItsAShaunParty

macrumors member
Jun 20, 2013
44
5
Moving User spaces away from the System has worked fine for many years and through many versions of macOS. Unfortunately, it seems a bug was introduced with maOS 12.5.1 which interfere with moved User spaces. One known symptom of the bug is a user whose user space has been relocated cannot log in directly. The breath and depth of issues caused by this bug are not known, as discussed in Apple Discussions.

Unable to login with user folder on external drive since 12.5.1 upgrade

This new bug appears to allow what appears to be the same path name tin different places to have different functions. It may be that the new bug is only present in code for Intel processors (not in code for Apple Silicon).

Please provide feedback to Apple. I am concerned that with release of macOS Ventura soon, bugs in macOS Monterey will receive less attention.

I decided to put this off but I can't put it off anymore.

I've seen a few horror stories coming from Ventura.

What have you been doing?
 

danano

macrumors newbie
Dec 3, 2017
27
18
I cannot tell you about Ventura because I still run Monterey (12.6.8). My comments do apply to all the system updates from 12.5.1 through 12.6.8. My computer is a MacPro (2019). System and Applications are on the internal SSD. Most of my User Spaces are all relocated to an array of spinning HDs. My Photos Library is relocated to SSDs running on a PCIe card. Along with the Applications and System I also have a spare Admin User Space located on the internal SSD.

System software updates done from the "spare" user account work with no problem. Log out other users, log in to the spare account, do the update and when the computer restarts, log in as the spare user. Then immediately log out, and you can log in as a User with a relocated account, and all should be fine. This is the easy way to work around this bug.

If you forget the need to use a special account, or want to test for the existence of the bug, you can do the update from a user account which has been relocated off the System disk. In this case (assuming the bug still exists), on restarting your computer after applying the update, when you try to log in to your existing (relocated) account, you will find yourself logging in to a new user space. If you find yourself here, log out the relocated user and log in to an admin account located on the System disk to repair the problem.

The problem is an update done from a relocated user space results in creation of an alias for the Volume on which the user space is located. Deleting this alias I believe eliminates the primary damage caused by the updater bug. What I am calling secondary damage is while the alias exists you could do inappropriate things to your data.

To see and fix the problem, log in to an admin account located on the System disk. In the Finder Go menu, choose Go To Folder... and in the window that opens choose Volumes. The Finder window which opens will list Volumes available (which are usually hidden). One Volume will be the one which holds your relocated Users, and right beside it with the same name but a different icon, will be the problem alias. Delete this alias, restart your computer and all should be fine.

My guess is updating the Ventura should go OK if done from a user space on the System disk. After Ventura is installed, other, possibly relocated, user spaces I expect will work properly. If you do this update, let us know your experience. I plan to update to Ventura after I finish a big project or two which I am now in the middle of.
 

ItsAShaunParty

macrumors member
Jun 20, 2013
44
5
I cannot tell you about Ventura because I still run Monterey (12.6.8). My comments do apply to all the system updates from 12.5.1 through 12.6.8. My computer is a MacPro (2019). System and Applications are on the internal SSD. Most of my User Spaces are all relocated to an array of spinning HDs. My Photos Library is relocated to SSDs running on a PCIe card. Along with the Applications and System I also have a spare Admin User Space located on the internal SSD.

System software updates done from the "spare" user account work with no problem. Log out other users, log in to the spare account, do the update and when the computer restarts, log in as the spare user. Then immediately log out, and you can log in as a User with a relocated account, and all should be fine. This is the easy way to work around this bug.

If you forget the need to use a special account, or want to test for the existence of the bug, you can do the update from a user account which has been relocated off the System disk. In this case (assuming the bug still exists), on restarting your computer after applying the update, when you try to log in to your existing (relocated) account, you will find yourself logging in to a new user space. If you find yourself here, log out the relocated user and log in to an admin account located on the System disk to repair the problem.

The problem is an update done from a relocated user space results in creation of an alias for the Volume on which the user space is located. Deleting this alias I believe eliminates the primary damage caused by the updater bug. What I am calling secondary damage is while the alias exists you could do inappropriate things to your data.

To see and fix the problem, log in to an admin account located on the System disk. In the Finder Go menu, choose Go To Folder... and in the window that opens choose Volumes. The Finder window which opens will list Volumes available (which are usually hidden). One Volume will be the one which holds your relocated Users, and right beside it with the same name but a different icon, will be the problem alias. Delete this alias, restart your computer and all should be fine.

My guess is updating the Ventura should go OK if done from a user space on the System disk. After Ventura is installed, other, possibly relocated, user spaces I expect will work properly. If you do this update, let us know your experience. I plan to update to Ventura after I finish a big project or two which I am now in the middle of.
Interesting. I'm still putting this off. But am considering updating first. Have you updated yet?
 

danano

macrumors newbie
Dec 3, 2017
27
18
A couple of days ago I updated from Monterey to Ventura, with no problems at all. I first logged in to my admin account located on my System disk. After the update I logged out of that account and into my user account located on a different disk. All smooth sailing.

One change I have noticed is the new version of Photos, and its associated demons, have been running hard analyzing my Photos library. Now all but 7 photos have been scanned, while before the update about 1500 remained unscanned. Also, duplicates of 1600 photos and one video have been found.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.