She also still sounds too robotic, IMO.
I'd much rather prefer that than OK Google's basic b*tch sounding voice.
She also still sounds too robotic, IMO.
I'd much rather prefer that than OK Google's basic b*tch sounding voice.
That's because Siri is an useless gimmick perpetually stuck in beta. The fact it STILL requires internet access to set reminders, while you can perfectly set reminders yourself while off-line, is all the proof you need that Apple really couldn't care less.
Siri was used as the gimmick of choice to sell one iPhone generation. Now that Apple is focusing on newer gimmicks for newer models, don't expect any improvement any time soon.
why isn't it getting better?
when siri first came out it was understandable that it was far from perfect because naturally it would need some training to get better, but now siri has been out for years and it's still half retarded. For example, I asked "Where's the nearest Apple store?" and she replied "Big Apple Fruit Store is 1.5 miles away." Seriously?
I use Siri several times a day and I'm glad to have the functionality available, but after years of training it really should be better than it is at this point. At the very least they should put a clickable button on the Siri response page that says "this result was not what I wanted" so that Siri and the programmers learn what areas they need to work on improving.
Nuance is currently in use and Apple is preparing to dump them in favor of their own system akin to how Google does things, but will use Bing to crawl the web. expect Siri and Cortana to produce nearly identical web search responses. (Of course who knows when Apple plans to do the switch is anyone's guess?)There was a top story post here or 9to5 a while back stating apple was looking to bring Siri in house as of now I believe we have an agreement for the underlying coding but apple doesn't own it.
I have seen several Siri job postings which could indicate a major Siri refresh next year not to mention I'm expecting actual voice recognition in 2015's devices.
I'd much rather prefer that than OK Google's basic b*tch sounding voice.
I only really use Siri when I'm driving, but it's extremely convenient.
I'll just keep it open most of the time, and I can just read/reply to text messages using 'Hey Siri' and occasionally make a speaker phone call to someone.
Apart from driving I barely use it...but when driving, I just it a ton.
Siri's backend is completely Nuance softwares own (the company that does Dragon Dictate). Apple has a secret software team in Boston (across from MIT) that is working on completely rebuilding Siri from the ground up that was established a few months before Samsung bought Nuance.when siri first came out it was understandable that it was far from perfect because naturally it would need some training to get better, but now siri has been out for years and it's still half retarded. For example, I asked "Where's the nearest Apple store?" and she replied "Big Apple Fruit Store is 1.5 miles away." Seriously?
I use Siri several times a day and I'm glad to have the functionality available, but after years of training it really should be better than it is at this point. At the very least they should put a clickable button on the Siri response page that says "this result was not what I wanted" so that Siri and the programmers learn what areas they need to work on improving.
Siri's backend is completely Nuance softwares own (the company that does Dragon Dictate). Apple has a secret software team in Boston (across from MIT) that is working on completely rebuilding Siri from the ground up that was established a few months before Samsung bought Nuance.
Siri is coming due for a massive improvement (along with Maps)...just be patient.
because it's an apple advertising gimmick par excellence - nothing more.
when siri first came out it was understandable that it was far from perfect because naturally it would need some training to get better, but now siri has been out for years and it's still half retarded. For example, I asked "Where's the nearest Apple store?" and she replied "Big Apple Fruit Store is 1.5 miles away." Seriously?
I use Siri several times a day and I'm glad to have the functionality available, but after years of training it really should be better than it is at this point. At the very least they should put a clickable button on the Siri response page that says "this result was not what I wanted" so that Siri and the programmers learn what areas they need to work on improving.
Siri is a critical component for the Watch, so I wouldn't be surprised if they introduce some major improvements at or just prior to its launch.
The reason it needs an internet connection is because Siri uses a remote server to interpret your voice. Said server has more processing power and saves at least several hundred MB of internal storage that would otherwise be consumed by voice processing software.
Oddly enough my favorite thing about having a phone or device is not needing to talk to it or listen to it to get it to respond to my requests (I enter a similar paradox, when I realize that I don't want to FaceTime, because I don't want people to see me using the toilet...)
On that note I've used Siri maybe twice, and once was to just test it to see if it worked. Realistically though, I can see using it slightly more if it had better third party app integration.
+1For me, Siri is just "good enough" to use in the car while I'm driving, but for any other purpose I don't find it useful. It seems to have gotten a little better over time but it's far from perfect.
Al depends on personal uses and experiences really. That said, Siri can certainly be better in all kinds of respects, but it has still improved over the years.Hi. I'm posting from the future, and I can say that the big improvement never happened.