m a y a said:
Then Apple has a lot of explaining to do, seems they just don't want to put the effort into supporting the new iBooks.
Could just be that Core Image runs slow on 64Megs on a Graphic Card and needs more than 64Megs to work well.
Like Hector said, it's not just the amount of RAM that the graphics chip has, it's whether or not the GPU supports newer DirectX 9-level features like pixel shaders. The way Apple has implemented the CoreImage/CoreVideo acceleration is dependent on this hardware feature (although don't ask me to explain why).
It's not just iBooks which will miss out on hardware accelerated CoreImage/CoreVideo. The current eMac family are also running the Radeon 9200, and the education-only edition of the iMac G5, which has a GeForce 4MX. IMHO the eye-candy effects of things like the Dashboard widgets aren't what makes CoreImage/CoreVideo exciting. It's the way that those APIs will provide hardware accelerated functions to applications developers which will make complex graphical and video transforms and effects run almost instantaneously on the appropriate hardware...with very little development effort. Take a look at Phil Schiller's excellent demonstration at the WWDC for an illustration of this.
Users with unsupported GPUs will still be able to run software developed using the CoreImage/CoreVideo APIs...it will just not run with full hardware acceleration, or in the case of things like Dashboard, it will disable some of the gratuitous effects. Yeah, it is kind of crappy that Apple is still selling machines in late 2004 which will not be able to take full advantage of their next OS X release in less than 6 months, but you aren't being left high and dry. However, if Apple doesn't update its entire range to at least the FX 5200 at the next round of hardware updates, something is seriously wrong...