What are the mod's views on thread bumping after a day or three if no one has responded in a thread that has no replies? Is this frowned upon the same as consecutive posting?
I have some old threads that never got a response, but if I bump or post a new thread on the same topic, I violate forum rules. So I figure no one has the answer.Bumps. Posts that bring a thread to the top of the New Posts list but add no content to the thread (bumps) are not permitted. This applies not only to posts that say "bump" but to those with the intent to bump, e.g. posts saying "anyone?" or the equivalent.
From Forum Rules:
I have some old threads that never got a response, but if I bump or post a new thread on the same topic, I violate forum rules. So I figure no one has the answer.
So if it is a question that needs assistance, what is the proper method to have it gain traction again? Start a redundant thread? I know that different members frequent the forums at different times so while you may not have luck initially, you may at a later point
Is there a sanctioned way for this?
I agree this would be a reason to add to a thread. However, you run into the consecutive post rule. If you post a thread and no one responds, even if you have new meaningful information to add, the rules say you should edit your original post, rather than post consecutively. If you do that, your thread won't get bumped and no one will see that you edited your original post.Instead of just saying "bump," talk about things you have tried in the mean time, or any progress you have made toward a solution.
I agree this would be a reason to add to a thread. However, you run into the consecutive post rule. If you post a thread and no one responds, even if you have new meaningful information to add, the rules say you should edit your original post, rather than post consecutively. If you do that, your thread won't get bumped and no one will see that you edited your original post.
For clarification, the rule about consecutive posts applies only when the posts are only a few minutes apart. If you have something new to say hours or days after a previous post, that's fine. Editing your previous post is fine too, but if it's a "Help!" thread you'll want the "bump" you get from adding new information.
For clarification, the rule about consecutive posts applies only when the posts are only a few minutes apart. If you have something new to say hours or days after a previous post, that's fine. Editing your previous post is fine too, but if it's a "Help!" thread you'll want the "bump" you get from adding new information.
Thanks that clears up a lot. So, basically, if they dont say bump or something to that effect, its okay.
I'll give my opinion as someone who has reported a number of people for bumping. From my stance, if you want continued help, show that you're trying and care about getting a solution.
Instead of just saying "bump," talk about things you have tried in the mean time, or any progress you have made toward a solution. Often people give little detail about their problem. Re-read your original post and determine if someone unfamiliar with the problem/topic would be able to understand what you're talking about. Make sure your explanation of the problem is clear and that your question is clear.
In short, be clear in your questions, including what you have attempted, and giving relevant information about your Mac/problem that could be helpful in solving the problem. Though, don't write too long of a post either, because your question will get lost in it all. Be concise and precise.
Since you are discussing the details of a moderation issue, do you give us permission to explain the details here?Well I did this and got a warning today. Because no one responded to my thread. I didn't just say bump, I had about a paragraph of stuff I wrote and I still got a warning.
Calling attention to your own thread or post takes away from somebody else's thread or post, so it's not fair.
Posts with no new content are annoying to other users.
I hate seeing the word bump, and I've seen people bump their threads to the top a number of times within an hour, which is ridiculous.This is a dumb policy
You know its funny people cannot bump their own threads but its highly encouraged to find existing threads and bump those - seems inconsistent.
Might be perceived as self serving?You know its funny people cannot bump their own threads but its highly encouraged to find existing threads and bump those - seems inconsistent.
Isn't posting to a 12 year old thread self serving (not in a negative way). We have one member in this thread that wanted to provide his/her opinion on the matter. What about aa member bumping a thread because they're incurring a critical error - isn't that just important?Might be perceived as self serving?
I've seen people bump their threads to the top a number of times within an hour, which is ridiculous.
Just ask a follow up question a day later or post a clarifying remark, to help the other members understand your problem
Isn't posting to a 12 year old thread self serving...
so Members have one shot and one shot only to get help?
Prior to 2023 this thread's last response was Jan 7, 2011