Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jimmy_uk

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Oct 19, 2015
2,360
3,182
UK
Ahead of getting a new Mac laptop to replace my ageing Windows desktop - I've decided I should get a NAS to store my iTunes, photos and documents.

So far I'm generally reading I should go with Synology and probably RAID 5. I'd want at least 8TB of usable storage. I'm not sure about what drives to pick at the moment as I'm reading bad reviews for all makes (reliability/longevity - 3 year error warnings etc).

I would like also to create a backup of the laptop - should this go to the NAS or should I buy a separate SSD to do this?
If it goes to the NAS, should this be a dedicated drive just for this or could I make a partition? I'm not sure this is a good idea as I will reduce my overall storage by 1TB and I'm not clear on how this affects RAID 5?


Not really sure what I'm letting myself in for - likely a world of hurt and days of my life lost!
 
  • Like
Reactions: splifingate

mattspace

macrumors 68040
Jun 5, 2013
3,188
2,879
Australia
So far I'm generally reading I should go with Synology and probably RAID 5. I'd want at least 8TB of usable storage.
The biggest issue with Synology, and this is research I've been doing from a similar position, is that it can't host certain types of files - so your photos library, for example, because it has to live on an APFS or HFS+ volume. So for that it either lives on your machine, or you have to get an external HFS+ drive pluggen to the Synology for it.

There's a lot of these gotchyas - Synology has great snapshotting for versioned backups, but it can't see inside package files so any big package files will be snapshotted in their entirety, if even one file within them changes.

Theoretically, its a better way to store your files than external hard drives, but a lot of the fine details are pain points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimmy_uk

hobowankenobi

macrumors 68020
Aug 27, 2015
2,076
883
on the land line mr. smith.
Synology is likely the most Mac-friendly and easiest for folks who don't have an IT background.

As far as backups go, no need to make partitions or volumes. Simply make a shared folder specific to backups. You can set a quota if you need to limit how much space a user (or a function). Much more flexible if/when things change.

You could use RAID 5, or Synology's Hybrid RAID, which is more flexible and available with the BTRFS. Either way, quotas are your friend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimmy_uk

splifingate

macrumors 65816
Nov 27, 2013
1,305
1,078
ATL
My 920+ (w/four 14TB rust-spinners (26+TB usable w/SHRaid)) is just a storage 'space' . . . entirely agnostic to file-types.

I sync my TM/backups/data to internal (20TB), then to the Syno (then *maybe* copy to external drives (while the penultimate culls get send to B2 for cold-storage)).

Your Administrative (read: "I have to regularly think&act upon it") overhead will definitely increase, but you can rest-assured that you now grasp some degree of data redundancy that will (hopefully?) someday relieve the stress when you *do* lose part of your data ;)

Data-loss is not a matter of 'if!', but a matter of "when?" *smile*
 
  • Like
Reactions: hobowankenobi
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.