Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

dcpmark

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Oct 20, 2009
1,026
815
Based on current bezel size, post your best guess of the overall size of the 5.4” phone. Show your work for extra credit.

When the phone is released we will revisit this thread, and the winner will get a hearty “Well done!” and be declared King of the Thread with all the associated bragging rights that go along with the title.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Seanm87

pbonitati

macrumors regular
Aug 25, 2015
241
407
Rhode Island
If aspect ratios stay the same which I suppose they will.

Current iPhone 11 Pro
5.8 = 144 x 71.4 X 8.1

Run the numbers
144 / 5.8 = 24.827
71.4 / 5.8 = 12.310


5.4 = 134 X 66.4 X anyones ballgame.

A little smaller than the iPhone 8 is today. Not super happy about this actually.

I honestly do not understand this move by them. I mean what kind of battery is this thing going to have? Personally I think the current 5.8 form factor is balls on and with the 11 pro battery increase I cannot ask for much else. I don't want an IMAX theater in my pocket (6.7) and I don't want a mini phone with a small battery.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: xxray and dcpmark

dcpmark

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Oct 20, 2009
1,026
815
As an aside, it’s pretty funny that we’re at a point in this society where a 5.4” phone is considered a “mini phone.” ?

But for your needs, what’s wrong with the 6.1”??
 

m0sher

macrumors 6502a
Mar 4, 2018
815
783
As an aside, it’s pretty funny that we’re at a point in this society where a 5.4” phone is considered a “mini phone.” ?

But for your needs, what’s wrong with the 6.1”??

Because 6.1 will be the dumbed down line and with LG displays next year. Not the Pro Line. No thanks.

so it’s either tiny or too large for most of us.

Edited to add Quote .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bethanie21

pbonitati

macrumors regular
Aug 25, 2015
241
407
Rhode Island
Yes, 6.1 would be great but rumors have it as being the non pro version. I sure hope there was some market justification that revealed users want a smaller pro model with likely a smaller battery. What I’ve realized over the years is that it always comes down to money when something stupid is going on or something that doesn’t make much sense to the majority of people.
 

m0sher

macrumors 6502a
Mar 4, 2018
815
783
Yes, 6.1 would be great but rumors have it as being the non pro version. I sure hope there was some market justification that revealed users want a smaller pro model with likely a smaller battery. What I’ve realized over the years is that it always comes down to money when something stupid is going on or something that doesn’t make much sense to the majority of people.

they’re true, they come from a very reliable source. 5.4 / 6.7 will have Samsung displays.

6.1 , LG will fulfill because they didn’t meet panel requirements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202

dcpmark

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Oct 20, 2009
1,026
815
Yes, 6.1 would be great but rumors have it as being the non pro version. I sure hope there was some market justification that revealed users want a smaller pro model with likely a smaller battery. What I’ve realized over the years is that it always comes down to money when something stupid is going on or something that doesn’t make much sense to the majority of people.

I thought the rumor said there would be TWO 6.1 models.....presumably one would be a “Pro“ model, no?
 

compwiz1202

macrumors 604
May 20, 2010
7,389
5,739
they’re true, they come from a very reliable source. 5.4 / 6.7 will have Samsung displays.

6.1 , LG will fulfill because they didn’t meet panel requirements.
I like a big phone, but I think 6.5 is already big enough. Are we really heading to the meme of the iP XXX being the size of an iPad? How big will finally be too big?
 
  • Like
Reactions: m0sher

bluecoast

macrumors 68020
Nov 7, 2017
2,217
2,637
Isn't it weird that in the world of 2010 with people using iPhone 3 series and 4 series that no-one felt inadequate and weird for using small iPhones?

It's great that this form factor is coming along - I bet that there's still lots of people with 4.8" phones that won't upgrade.
 

dcpmark

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Oct 20, 2009
1,026
815
Isn't it weird that in the world of 2010 with people using iPhone 3 series and 4 series that no-one felt inadequate and weird for using small iPhones?

It's great that this form factor is coming along - I bet that there's still lots of people with 4.8" phones that won't upgrade.

Hey, I just bought a Verizon Palm Phone just to play around with.....a solid 3.3” of straight Android fire. ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluecoast

JPack

macrumors G5
Mar 27, 2017
12,563
23,315
Based on current bezel size:

iPhone 5.4"
W = 2.61"
H = 5.24"

iPhone 8
W = 2.65"
H = 5.45"

1575419221442.png
 

MF878

macrumors 6502
Jul 12, 2011
348
288
Auckland, New Zealand
I think the 5.4” will end up being closer to 5.5”, like how the XS Max rumors referred to 6.4” but it is actually closer to 6.5” (thus Apple rounds up). This is because the least difficult way to move to the three new sizes all with OLED displays is to go from the current:

5.85” 2436x1125 - 458ppi (152.67dpi)
6.06” 1792x828 - 326ppi (163dpi) (LCD)
6.46” 2688x1242 - 458ppi (152.67dpi)

to this:

5.49” 2436x1125 - 489ppi (163dpi)
6.06” 2688x1242 - 489ppi (163dpi)
~6.7” new res - 489ppi (163dpi)

This unifies all three sizes back to the traditional UI scaling of 163dpi and introduces only one new resolution at the top of the line. Introducing a new resolution at the bottom would means devs would have to stuff their existing apps into a smaller usable area, expanding into a bigger resolution is easier. We know these resolutions can be produced because most Android flagships are over 500ppi.

By this logic, you would therefore assume that the screen is 5.48/5.49” (so basically 5.5”), and such a display would coincidentally have the exact same width as the older 4.7” displays.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jetcat3 and dcpmark

JPack

macrumors G5
Mar 27, 2017
12,563
23,315
I think the 5.4” will end up being closer to 5.5”, like how the XS Max rumors referred to 6.4” but it is actually closer to 6.5” (thus Apple rounds up). This is because the least difficult way to move to the three new sizes all with OLED displays is to go from the current:

5.85” 2436x1125 - 458ppi (152.67dpi)
6.06” 1792x828 - 326ppi (163dpi) (LCD)
6.46” 2688x1242 - 458ppi (152.67dpi)

to this:

5.49” 2436x1125 - 489ppi (163dpi)
6.06” 2688x1242 - 489ppi (163dpi)
~6.7” new res - 489ppi (163dpi)

This unifies all three sizes back to the traditional UI scaling of 163dpi and introduces only one new resolution at the top of the line. Introducing a new resolution at the bottom would means devs would have to stuff their existing apps into a smaller usable area, expanding into a bigger resolution is easier. We know these resolutions can be produced because most Android flagships are over 500ppi.

By this logic, you would therefore assume that the screen is 5.48/5.49” (so basically 5.5”), and such a display would coincidentally have the exact same width as the older 4.7” displays.

The leaks are suggesting 5.42", 6.06" and 6.67".

The credible Xs Max rumors from 2018 all referenced 6.5", not 6.4".

Personally, I doubt the mainstream 6.1" OLED will have the same PPI as the 5.4" and 6.7" models.
 

MF878

macrumors 6502
Jul 12, 2011
348
288
Auckland, New Zealand
The leaks are suggesting 5.42", 6.06" and 6.67".

The credible Xs Max rumors from 2018 all referenced 6.5", not 6.4".

Personally, I doubt the mainstream 6.1" OLED will have the same PPI as the 5.4" and 6.7" models.

That rumour was less than 3 months out from the keynote, at this early stage people were still referring to it as 6.4”. I wouldn’t put much stock in the precise screen size rumours until production nears. Also, the regular models basically have to be 400ppi+ if they’re going to be pentile OLED otherwise they will have worse perceived sharpness than the current 326ppi LCD. It would make sense for them to have the same resolution but be different in other areas (eg. Max brightness, ProMotion, etc).
 

one more

macrumors 601
Aug 6, 2015
4,516
5,680
Earth
I honestly do not understand this move by them. I mean what kind of battery is this thing going to have? Personally I think the current 5.8 form factor is balls on and with the 11 pro battery increase I cannot ask for much else. I don't want an IMAX theater in my pocket (6.7) and I don't want a mini phone with a small battery.

The battery life could be similar to the current Pro 5.8”, as it will also have to “feed” a smaller screen, which should require less overall energy? If they make it slightly thicker, they could also fit some extra battery cells.
 

kevink2

macrumors 68000
Nov 2, 2008
1,842
294
The 5.4" size would be nice for me too. I went from 3G, 4, 5, 6, 7+, X. (with offshoots like my backup phone line being the SE).

Hopefully without a major battery life issue. But on vacation, especially overseas, I learned to carry a backup phone for the extra battery in the extra phone.
 

CrazyForCashews

macrumors 65816
Apr 1, 2018
1,048
2,758
My hunch is that the 5.4" iPhone will be a huge success for Apple, even if it's not a Pro model.

Anecdotal but from what I've heard from people is that they're generally tired of big phones and they always appreciate and are blown away when I whip out my iPhone SE and they hold it in their hands.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.