(1) Xbox Live fee--Playing games online, in my opinion, is not something we should have to pay for. Access to advanced functionality, etc., I can see that argument. But fees for playing multiplayer? I come from a computer background, so the idea of a fee is utterly ridiculous to me.
(1) Xbox Live fee--Playing games online, in my opinion, is not something we should have to pay for.
(2) Microsoft Points--Someone can correct me if I'm wrong here, but my understanding is that 800 Microsoft Points is equal to $10,
I'm a self-admitting Sony fanboy here (I have a thing for underdogs, and through their own witlessness, they've managed to make themselves the underdogs in these next gen wars), but I do have issue with two things with the Xbox/Xbox 360. Great platforms, but two things REALLY irk me. Like, beyond words.
(1) Xbox Live fee--Playing games online, in my opinion, is not something we should have to pay for. Access to advanced functionality, etc., I can see that argument. But fees for playing multiplayer? I come from a computer background, so the idea of a fee is utterly ridiculous to me.
(2) Microsoft Points--Someone can correct me if I'm wrong here, but my understanding is that 800 Microsoft Points is equal to $10, which to me is deception at it's worst. When I see 800 points (like on my Wii, for example), I think $8. In the case of the Wii, it is in fact $8. Tricking consumers into thinking things are cheaper than they are (can't you imagine Wal-Mart forcing you to buy "Wal-bucks" that work in a similar way, to prod you towards buying things out of your budget) to me is corporate evil at its worst.
No offense to Microsoft gaming, as they've managed to pull off quite a coup, but those two peeves really get my goose. Just my two cents.
There are things I'd love to change for all systems. The 360 having the most, the PS3 having the most important.
Playing games online, in my opinion, is not something we should have to pay for. Access to advanced functionality, etc., I can see that argument. But fees for playing multiplayer? I come from a computer background, so the idea of a fee is utterly ridiculous to me.
Microsoft Points--Someone can correct me if I'm wrong here, but my understanding is that 800 Microsoft Points is equal to $10, which to me is deception at it's worst.
No offense to Microsoft gaming, as they've managed to pull off quite a coup, but those two peeves really get my goose. Just my two cents.
I couldn't disagree more. Xbox live is way more advance then anything on PC. Xbox live has build as standard that forces all developer to follow. That means that EVERY single X360 game that support multiplayer has to have a preset of functionallity. That what makes Xbox live great. When you buy a game and it's support online multiplayer, you are certain that the same features will be implemented.
If you want free gaming, go for it. Just don't expect much. Unmoderated servers, non-unified user names/friend lists...gets a little aggravating to go into a team deathmatch or deathmatch server in a PC FPS and realize I have to change my name from "zero2dash" (my moniker for at least 10 years now) to "zero2dash1" or something equally retarded because someone else decided to steal it.
having programming/implementation guidelines or points needed for approval is hardly something extra ordinary
microsoft still charges money for something everybody else doesn't (microsoft isn't hosting actually any game servers ... it's p2p system where the servers simply do the handshaking ... before somebody now starts comparing it to mmporgs)
oh and what if a company doesn't want to use voice chat because they think it breaks the atmosphere of their game ? ...
edit: guess i was too slow
that said it's a matter of philosophy... after all these years playing online (10 years actually) for no money i'm simply not willing to pay for something i have for free
if you could fill up your car for years for free and somebody comes along with a new gas station saying "you have to pay here for the gas but you get a small bag of broccoli with every purchase" i guess you would not really be convinced either unless you are a broccoli addict
(for me countless live features would be essentially worthless since i know exactly 0 persons with a xbox 360)
There's a difference between hating crappy products which happen to be made by the same company (which is what I see from Mac users), and hating a product because it's made by a certain company (ie anti-Apple zealots).
I find it kinda funny that so many people have so much trouble with Windows and stability as well as viruses and such, when I dont have any of those problems.
I couldn't disagree more. Xbox live is way more advance then anything on PC. Xbox live has build as standard that forces all developer to follow. That means that EVERY single X360 game that support multiplayer has to have a preset of functionallity. That what makes Xbox live great. When you buy a game and it's support online multiplayer, you are certain that the same features will be implemented.
Never used Steam I see? Before that (and games not on it) use their own online systems, which is good and bad depending on said game. But Steam centralises it all, friends list in all games (shift+tab), demos, trailers, buy games online (big and small). The new BETA community features put it way over and beyond what Live can do.
I am sorry that you dont' have any friend......on X360 that is.We got lots of Xboxer at the office and we play R6 every night. I do not mind paying 5$ a month (0,16$ a day) to go a moderated, Unified service. Like I have mentioned previously online pc gaming is far from being the same experience that Xbox live offer. Of course I wouldn't mind getting it for free but for 0.16$ a day i can't complain.
and moderated service ? isn't xbox live the most well known online service for slurs and insults ?