Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Xeyad

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Nov 19, 2012
342
288
21bu3p.png


So the Apple Watch has phone functionality, which is pretty cool. But it would've made sense to add a front facing camera for FaceTime calls too! Something to stand out from the crowd.

This is the iPad 1 all over again. :(
 

Patriot24

macrumors 68030
Dec 29, 2010
2,813
805
California
Where do you put the camera?
How much extra does it cost?
How much larger does the watch have to be as a result?
What are the privacy implications?
Are you going to stand there holding your arm up to your face for 25 minutes?
What are they going to put on version 2 to tell you that it is better than version 1?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrodieApple

Intell

macrumors P6
Jan 24, 2010
18,955
509
Inside
This isn't the iPad 1 all over again. There just isn't room inside the watch for a camera. Where on the iPad 1, there was room, it just wasn't added probably due to cost.
 

NewbieCanada

macrumors 68030
Oct 9, 2007
2,574
37
Putting aside considerations of a camera, the Watch almost certainly communicates with the phone via Bluetooth, which I assume doesn't have the bandwidth for video.
 

Intell

macrumors P6
Jan 24, 2010
18,955
509
Inside
Bluetooth 4.0 has a bandwidth of 24 megabits per second. More than enough for video and audio. Even Bluetooth 2.0 would be adequate with 3 megabits per second or roughly 80 kilobytes per second.
 

douglasf13

macrumors 68000
Jul 2, 2010
1,775
1,077
I'm assuming it's a matter of size, cost, and maybe battery life. I'm sure we'll see it later down the road.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.