Yes, though I would say that model needs fine tuning. Here are some statistics on the A series with a couple small models: https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/discussions/4508Is the experience stable with minimal crashing or hangups?
And I guess it was a pretty bad example to point to, given this paper 😂This is something I tried to point to when people say on Macs that 8GB is enough. Well not specifically this, but some new feature that will be more RAM intensive that will struggle earlier for those people who have the base 8GB configuration that Apple has stuck with for so long.
With my husband it stopped working a couple of years ago as well. She just claims not to know who my husband is, even though it’s indicated in the contacts app.That doesn't work for you? I ask Siri to "call my wife" regularly. I did it earlier this week.
Worse, there already is an Ajax in the computer world: Asynchronous JavaScript and XMLAnd Colgate-Palmolive was not consulted...
I tend to agree with you. It seems the people most thrilled by ChatGPT are people who live in a world of words, and who find the ability of ChatGPT to remix words to be valuable. I'm not one of those people, and while I'm impressed that ChatGPT can make up a song, I'm unimpressed with its ability to do something I care about, like perform actual research on something unknown (as opposed to looking up reference material).My point is not about local vs cloud based LLM.
It’s. About the uselessness of it all.
I can already assign ChatGPT audio to the action button on my 15 pro max…and it’s just a chatty mostly useless bot.
AI is so overhyped (at least the chat bots)
This sort of thing is irritating, but it's dumb to blame it on the "AI" part of Siri. These things tend to be run of the mill coding bugs, especially, in Apple's current OS's, some stupidity related to security and permissions.With my husband it stopped working a couple of years ago as well. She just claims not to know who my husband is, even though it’s indicated in the contacts app.
Does this mean Siri will finally be able to “call my wife on iPhone” again after losing that ability around 2-3 years ago?
I really hope Apple gives us an option to disable and completely remove it. I don't want AI on any of my devices.. i've survived for 60 years without AI, pretty sure I can do without it now.I really hope Apple GPT isn't a useless and "woke"
ChatGPT is only proof of concept that llms can be used to complete human tasks quicker. You can already personalise ChatGPT to yourself. You do this by either:I tend to agree with you. It seems the people most thrilled by ChatGPT are people who live in a world of words, and who find the ability of ChatGPT to remix words to be valuable. I'm not one of those people, and while I'm impressed that ChatGPT can make up a song, I'm unimpressed with its ability to do something I care about, like perform actual research on something unknown (as opposed to looking up reference material).
BUT
(a) many people apparently do find many aspects of this useful. It's absurd to deny them a tool because I don't find it useful.
(b) it's possible (early days...) that Apple, by embedding the tool in the OS and even providing APIs, will generate value in a way that doesn't yet exist. For example
- something I find a huge hassle is when I want to refer to something I read a year ago. I can sometimes establish a hook that can find it ("I think I mailed it to my brother?" "I think it was on AstralCodexTen?") but even that's a slog, and if all I can remember is the gist of the argument, forget it.
If Apple could track everything I read (on all devices) [and hell, why stop at reading, also track the lectures and audiobooks I listen to] and I can refer to something by whatever vague memories I have to perform the lookup, that's real progress...
- we can be less ambitious. If can simply perform local searches by semantics (ie considering word context, considering synonyms, etc) rather than exact word match, that would be a huge boost to Spotlight
- consider everything you'd want from a smart secretary. Summarize large repetitive documents. Tell me what's different between this file and that file. Read my email (or posting or comment) and tell me if it's too emotional, too predictable, whatever.
Much of this stuff is not available today, and will not be available tomorrow. My personal secretary needs to be personalized to me, to understand the features I WANT in my writing and the features I want removed, the things I find interesting and those I find a boring waste of time, etc. I think much of this is not yet done well, let alone in a personalized fashion.
But everything starts small. NIST Special Database 19 used to be state of the art for huge machines not long ago, now we just expect that we can cut and paste text in any random image. You get to where we want to be one OS release at a time.
No I think what Siri is saying has more to do with the meaning of time. She obviously knows cakes take 50 minutes to bake (because she is an Apple product), but she also knows time is relative (because she is highly advanced). You can't treat her like an assistant. If you want dumbed down answers go to google, but if you want to break through deeper levels of understanding ask Siri.
Now, I wasn't there when you asked the question, and I don't know you. However maybe what she was getting at could simply be that you don't really need to be eating or baking a cake right now. There are more valuable uses of your time. Maybe she was saying that if she were you she wouldn't spend more than 15 minutes doing something like that. Enjoy life. Spend more time connecting with the people around you. Just listen to Siri. Really listen to her. And you'll see your life improve.
Faceid and touchid are ml/ai based and run on device.I really hope Apple gives us an option to disable and completely remove it. I don't want AI on any of my devices.. i've survived for 60 years without AI, pretty sure I can do without it now.
I don't rely on any of those things on my iPhone. people need to learn to go back to using their head for something besides a hat rack.Faceid and touchid are ml/ai based and run on device.
Spotify and apple music‘s recommendation engines are ml/ai based and have solved the problem of music discovery.
When you take photo you are using ml/ai. 10-15 years ago you had to set white balance, iso, shutter speed etc manually or use Aweful auto settings that phones and cameras had back then. Now ml/ai does the settings and post production for you. No need to post process the majority of your photos.
These are example of purposeful ai that’s embedded in to apps that we know and love. Bad ai is
-Facebook and TikTok’s content algorithms.
-Siri
I agree with your vision of a personal digital butler…that would be truly game changing ..but it kinda was the promise of Siri and we know how this turned out.I tend to agree with you. It seems the people most thrilled by ChatGPT are people who live in a world of words, and who find the ability of ChatGPT to remix words to be valuable. I'm not one of those people, and while I'm impressed that ChatGPT can make up a song, I'm unimpressed with its ability to do something I care about, like perform actual research on something unknown (as opposed to looking up reference material).
BUT
(a) many people apparently do find many aspects of this useful. It's absurd to deny them a tool because I don't find it useful.
(b) it's possible (early days...) that Apple, by embedding the tool in the OS and even providing APIs, will generate value in a way that doesn't yet exist. For example
- something I find a huge hassle is when I want to refer to something I read a year ago. I can sometimes establish a hook that can find it ("I think I mailed it to my brother?" "I think it was on AstralCodexTen?") but even that's a slog, and if all I can remember is the gist of the argument, forget it.
If Apple could track everything I read (on all devices) [and hell, why stop at reading, also track the lectures and audiobooks I listen to] and I can refer to something by whatever vague memories I have to perform the lookup, that's real progress...
- we can be less ambitious. If can simply perform local searches by semantics (ie considering word context, considering synonyms, etc) rather than exact word match, that would be a huge boost to Spotlight
- consider everything you'd want from a smart secretary. Summarize large repetitive documents. Tell me what's different between this file and that file. Read my email (or posting or comment) and tell me if it's too emotional, too predictable, whatever.
Much of this stuff is not available today, and will not be available tomorrow. My personal secretary needs to be personalized to me, to understand the features I WANT in my writing and the features I want removed, the things I find interesting and those I find a boring waste of time, etc. I think much of this is not yet done well, let alone in a personalized fashion.
But everything starts small. NIST Special Database 19 used to be state of the art for huge machines not long ago, now we just expect that we can cut and paste text in any random image. You get to where we want to be one OS release at a time.
I never blamed the AI team for thatThis sort of thing is irritating, but it's dumb to blame it on the "AI" part of Siri. These things tend to be run of the mill coding bugs, especially, in Apple's current OS's, some stupidity related to security and permissions.
We all hope Apple will fix them, but it's not going to the AI team that fixes them, and blaming the AI team all you like won't change that.
Amazing. Thanks for sharing the link. This is a promising. I wonder whether the ability to leverage flash memory where VRAM low, will make it possible to store Llm for an iPhone 15 on an external ssd.Yes, though I would say that model needs fine tuning. Here are some statistics on the A series with a couple small models: https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/discussions/4508
I tend to be a sceptic too and also think that there is a lot of hype currently around llms. But it's early days and the field is constantly progressing and evolving. Also, the underlying technology has many more applications than just general purpose chatbots. Think about the Whisper model by OpenAI for transcription and translation, which you can already use locally on beefier desktop computers. I tried it myself and it's amazing how accurate it is. Also llm chatbots are quite popular with programmers already. They won't write the whole program for you, but can help with producing a lot of boilerplate code just by asking the right questions in written.My point is not about local vs cloud based LLM.
It’s. About the uselessness of it all.
I can already assign ChatGPT audio to the action button on my 15 pro max…and it’s just a chatty mostly useless bot.
AI is so overhyped (at least the chat bots)
Siri is Apples ClippySounds great! But please call it something other than Siri as that name fills me with dread every time I consider giving it another try.
Rightly so, as this solution is WAY cheaper. Or should be, at least.Apple is so clever to avoid adding more ram 😉