24 year Apple everything guy with an aging MBpro nearing end of life. Up to maybe 5 years ago, I wouldn't even think about anything other than a replacement MB. Now, I'm ready to potentially jump to a PC laptop. Why?
RAM & SSD relative pricing from the
one "company store" that is now free to charge anything they want for such commodities. Right now it is 3X-5X, but nothing at all stands in the way of that migrating towards becoming 8X-10X. Then why not 15X-20X? The very same rationale the defenders sling about this one work at 8X and 15X too. And without ANY competitive alternatives of both commodities, it's either pay the very fat premium-
ANY fat premium- or bail on the whole computer. That latter option is actually an option for every buyer. And I'm right on the edge of actually doing it.
With the death of bootcamp, Macs can no longer be the only computer to be fully compatible with both worlds. For anyone who must have some Windows capability too, that was a tremendous benefit loss. Yes, there's ARM Windows but that's not full Windows. Yes, ARM Windows works great with the mainstream stuff but it only takes one NOT-mainstream-but-needed app to make that fail as a solution.
Working Mac people often have clients that are Windows-oriented, thus Windows tends to be the "need" computer vs. Mac as the "want" computer. If ARM can't cover the need, those people need a Windows PC. In embracing a Desktop Silicon Mac, it influenced other choices like selecting a monitor with more than one input so that I could also use it with a Mac Mini-like PC too. That directly impacted the traditional halo effect of considering only the ASD monitor, since it lacks dual inputs. So an Apple monitor sale was lost in the same considerations. With both Mac & PC hidden behind a Dell 40" Ultra-Wide monitor, my entire visual experience using computers can look like I'm a Dell guy (the only visible piece of the setup).
Thus, I've already added one PC to the mix... "old fashioned bootcamp" if you will. In doing so, I've re-realized 3 key concepts:
- Windows 11 is quite good- not nearly as bad as Apple fans commonly make it out to be. Old nonsense we recycle that existed in Vista or XP is long-since evolved in 10 and now 11.
- PC parts competition drives pricing down and thus consumer value UP. I purchased a gaming PC with TEN TBs of fast SSD and 32GB of fast RAM for LESS THAN only the 8TB upgrade of Apple SSD by itself. Competition delivers value for us consumers. No competition means we pay much more than we have to if we buy the lone, "Company Store" option.
- The rationalization of PPW so that Apple can win that discussion contest every time is great and all... but the counter to that is raw POWER. In other words, when we argue PPW, we're actually arguing Power vs. PPW. When you remove that filter (that is, when you say, I want 'more power' vs. maximum efficiency of power), you get a more powerful computer. More power means faster processing. Faster processing means things get done faster. Yes, "cooking eggs" and "third degree burns" and "fans like jet engines" are all things that may make us feel better about our Apple products, but Intel Macs were fine with all of that while Apple used it. Now that I've got this PC, I find myself giving it more and more of the power-based tasks. Why? It uses a bit more power than the minimum possible to get tasks done FASTER. It's faster computing. Bonus: no nuclear reactor required and my electric bill doesn't even register a noticeable difference.
So here I am: 24-year Apple everything pondering choosing a Windows laptop for "on the road/on the go" tasks and then bringing work back to the desktop where I could do some polish on a desktop Mac. I'd
MUCH RATHER buy another MB instead of a PC, but not at the "new, improved" Apple premium. When my existing MB conks is going to force the decision. If that was today, it would likely be PC. Fingers crossed (likely fruitlessly) that Apple Inc wakes up and decides it would be better to throw customers some bones instead of seemingly making every choice for shareholders. There is no 47% maximized, "another record margin" profit in sales NOT made. And customers who choose something else don't come back should Apple decide to up the value proposition in the future. Worse, customers may get used to doing things the other way and just stick... as many of us stick with Apple even if we have to farrrrrrrrr overpay for commodities like RAM & SSD.
Shareholders rejoice!!! 💰💰💰 But consumers do retain that ONE "think different" ("spend different"?) choice. Even if we would rather NOT make
that choice, nothing blocks the option to do so.
Many of us got to Apple FROM PC. Why? For some of us, it is because we got fed up with PC/Windows/Microsoft. That same driver can work the
other way. Are we fed up with 3X-5X RAM & SSD pricing? How about if it becomes 4X-6X or 8X-10X? With no competition for such things, there is no natural check & balance on our favorite company. They can ask ANY price and if we want "the rest" bad enough, we just roll over and pay. But what if some of us reach that "enough is enough" moment? That's what I read in OPs post... and you've just read in mine.