Nermal said:Huh? It goes to the same place, regardless of whether you include the www or not.
PlaceofDis said:first link wasnt working for me, timed out multiple times, oh well
Nermal said:Weird, worked for me. Anyway, I see it was worth an avatar change
el greenerino said:So any advantage to this over firefox or safari?
oaklandbum said:The optimized builds (well at least mine) aren't based on the same code as 0.8.3, but off of the latest code.
oaklandbum said:The optimized builds (well at least mine) aren't based on the same code as 0.8.3, but off of the latest code.
oaklandbum said:The optimized builds (well at least mine) aren't based on the same code as 0.8.3, but off of the latest code.
Santaduck said:I liked Camino before, but it was so darned slow... which is why I went to Firefox, but it was so darned buggy (OS X version). I wish FF was as clean as their WinXP version =\
Anyways, is the new Camino noticeably faster?
auxplage said:Under the optimized versions I do not see 7447 the processor used in my eMac.
It the 7400 the correct optimized version to use?
oaklandbum said:No, you'll want to use the 7450 ones. The 745x and 744x are basically the same except the 744x have less cache.