Thanks for the info. Very interesting indee. Haven’t really paid attention to the battery stats when using the scaling. if that feature is really eating so much battery life, I will stop using it.
Ok, this are the preliminary results when back to regular scaling -the standard option-
As you can see, with 6h of a variety of usage (mostly YouTube videos and web searches, a bit of Apollo and a bit of other apps) I’ve reached 49%. So… if 6h are needed to drain 50% of the battery, then 12h will get the whole battery.
Also, if we take into account that it takes an extra time to drain from 100% to 99% (because my battery is pretty new), then that 51% could indeed be roughly 55% of the battery. If that assumption is accurate, the total battery life with this usage would be of 10.9h, which would match the battery life I’ve had this past days with the “more space” option.
So, with my experience from today, with just half of the battery being used with the “standard” visualization, the results are pretty similar to the couple of days I’ve been using the “more space” option. Maybe a tiny bit better but that could be attributed to variations in screen brightness or apps used, although I’ve tried to keep the usage as similar as possible.
Tomorrow I will end the battery of this cycle and share the amount of hours obtained. If it sits on the 11h, then the visualization/scale has barely influence on battery life. If I get 12 hours, it will be slightly better than using the “more space“ option, but nothing to obsess about.
The 14 hours mark was with a very light use, that could be the explanation why I got better battery life at first with the “standard” visualization.
Hope this helps, I’ll keep updating this test.