Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Kentuckienne

macrumors regular
Sep 19, 2013
159
8
No>me<where
IMO, the 2012 Mini's have gotten so cheap that it doesn't make sense tinkering with a dead one unless you enjoy that kind of thing. At MacSales (OWC) you can get the base 2012 Mini for about $60 including a limited warranty (I'm sure there are other places to find them too). If you max it out as a 2.6ghz quad with 16gb RAM and a 256gb SSD, that's still only $280 in "excellent condition" with warranty. I paid $1300 for that exact same machine from MacSales in 2016!
It was such a great machine until it wasn't. I added an SSD drive and installed the OS on that, with the 1 TB spinner for data. Booted quickly and was still working well for me when the video started failing. First everything would turn orangish... then would get better. Then the display started being interlaced with black vertical lines, like looking through vertical blinds. I managed to get it where I could see well enough to be sure all was backed up to external drives. I was using an LG monitor and I think HDMI, could have been mini-display port. The setup has been dismantled a while and I moved the cables.

Update: I remembered I had an external drive enclosure and I might be able to pull the HD out of the dead Mini too check the file structure - long story - and I impulsively hooked the thing up to the monitor using the Mini DisplayPort cable I bought just for the LG monitor. Lo and behold, it booted. The video is fine. I'm making one last desperate file copy which will hopefully finish before the power goes out again. Storms. Pray for me.
 
Last edited:

weaztek

macrumors 6502
Aug 28, 2009
416
225
Madison
But will there be an M4Pro mini? I am not sure if that is a sure thing
Everything M4 (other than the announced iPad Pro) is speculative at this point. But Max Tech did bring up some good points about how we probably won't see an M3 Mini if the M4 chip drops today (it did).

This is quite good news because if he's right (about Mini's skipping over the M3) we'll get a somewhat larger performance bump going straight to an M4.

I feel i'm in a pretty good position because my 2018 i5 Mini is holding up really well for what I do. So I can wait this thing out and perhaps grab an M2 Pro, an M4 (speculative), or an M4 Pro (speculative) in a year or more when it's sorted out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark

sublunar

macrumors 68020
Jun 23, 2007
2,086
1,413
Everything M4 (other than the announced iPad Pro) is speculative at this point. But Max Tech did bring up some good points about how we probably won't see an M3 Mini if the M4 chip drops today (it did).

This is quite good news because if he's right (about Mini's skipping over the M3) we'll get a somewhat larger performance bump going straight to an M4.

I feel i'm in a pretty good position because my 2018 i5 Mini is holding up really well for what I do. So I can wait this thing out and perhaps grab an M2 Pro, an M4 (speculative), or an M4 Pro (speculative) in a year or more when it's sorted out.
I wonder if the reason why we haven’t had the M3 CPU in more products is because Apple don’t intend for it to linger too long in the supply chain due to its experimental N3B node size (So called evolutionary Dead end).

Therefore the A17Pro probably won’t go into next years iPhone 16 (non pro) but we will get a variant of it on a more common node and potentially cheaper to make with better yield (there will be room to do the usual deactivate a single GPU core to up the valid CPUs).

it could in theory allow the iPhone 16 to be a bit thinner than the 15 because of the more efficient process. Kind of like how the M4 iPads are so much thinner than the M2 ones.

back to the mini though, the M4 makes the more sensible choice as cpu over the more expensive and difficult to make M3 cpu due to the N3B process used. It may explain why Apple aren’t using the A17 pro in the iPad mini - a smaller process but cheaper to make A17 (non pro) makes more sense in the iPad mini but we might not see stocks of that till October due to iPhone 16 getting first dibs on it And Apple wanting people to pull the trigger on the m4 iPads instead.
 

nobullone1964

macrumors 6502
Oct 20, 2018
273
108
it certainly would be nice but I don’t think that is a certainty. I think the release of a mini M4 pro is tied to M4 Studio which in turn is linked to the successor to the M2Ultra (Whatever it might be called)
We'll see. The Studio starts with a Max chip and ends with an ultra. Remember that the M1 Mini didn't have a pro chip. That was added with M2 and I don't think Apple will drop that spec from the Mini. The Mini can be introduced with the laptops when they are announced because of the pro chip those laptops use.
 

turbineseaplane

macrumors P6
Mar 19, 2008
15,191
32,668
With WWDC coming up and Apple's push to AI, the Mac mini M4 has to come during the event. How else would one start developing AI apps without a M4 desktop (or laptop)? It can't be just an iPad Pro M4 with MK.

I sure hope so

The new Microsoft+Snapdragon hardware is so compellingly competitive with M1-M3 that I think Apple needs to be rushing out M4 across the lineups
 

nobullone1964

macrumors 6502
Oct 20, 2018
273
108
If there is an M4 Pro and Max available there will be a Mac Mini. Also, there will be the MacBook Pro lineup. The Mac Mini is reliant on the pro chip's introduction. The only available desktop right now if offered?.......iMac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cape Dave

sublunar

macrumors 68020
Jun 23, 2007
2,086
1,413
If there is an M4 Pro and Max available there will be a Mac Mini. Also, there will be the MacBook Pro lineup. The Mac Mini is reliant on the pro chip's introduction. The only available desktop right now if offered?.......iMac.
The iMac PSU is known to be overspecified for the Mx series CPUs - maybe it's capable of handling an M4 Pro? Makes you wonder why Apple wouldn't have pulled the trigger on adding an M1 Pro or M2 Pro SKU though? The Mac mini could handle a 65w CPU which is why the Pro series CPUs were added.

The iMac cooling solution ought to be able to handle M4 Pro I'd have thought, maybe it runs cooler than M1 Pro and M2 Pro?

However, the M4 Pro is surely more likely to be around for the October MacBook Pro launch - it's the more logically consistent call.

If Apple decided to bring the M4 Pro CPU forward in enough quantities to make it available in a top SKU Mac mini it might be feasible if they deemed it important enough for a WWDC launch - for developers for example as Apple prioritise AI development.
 

Chuckeee

macrumors 68000
Aug 18, 2023
1,977
5,395
Southern California
The iMac PSU is known to be overspecified for the Mx series CPUs - maybe it's capable of handling an M4 Pro? Makes you wonder why Apple wouldn't have pulled the trigger on adding an M1 Pro or M2 Pro SKU though? The Mac mini could handle a 65w CPU which is why the Pro series CPUs were added.

The iMac cooling solution ought to be able to handle M4 Pro I'd have thought, maybe it runs cooler than M1 Pro and M2 Pro?

However, the M4 Pro is surely more likely to be around for the October MacBook Pro launch - it's the more logically consistent call.

If Apple decided to bring the M4 Pro CPU forward in enough quantities to make it available in a top SKU Mac mini it might be feasible if they deemed it important enough for a WWDC launch - for developers for example as Apple prioritise AI development.
The iMac “Mac on a stick” board is not wide enough to accommodate an MxPro chip and its associated heat sink. In addition the iMac fans are much smaller than the fans on the Mac mini and the MBP, it is unlikely they can provide sufficient air flow to cool an MxPro chip.

Although if the M4Pro chip is significantly smaller with an appropriately smaller heat sink it might be feasible but I seriously doubt it.

The other possibility is to redesign the iMac, making either a larger chin and/or thicker body but I think that is also unlikely for the upcoming M4 iMac update.
 

sublunar

macrumors 68020
Jun 23, 2007
2,086
1,413
The iMac “Mac on a stick” board is not wide enough to accommodate an MxPro chip and its associated heat sink. In addition the iMac fans are much smaller than the fans on the Mac mini and the MBP, it is unlikely they can provide sufficient air flow to cool an MxPro chip.

Although if the M4Pro chip is significantly smaller with an appropriately smaller heat sink it might be feasible but I seriously doubt it.

The other possibility is to redesign the iMac, making either a larger chin and/or thicker body but I think that is also unlikely for the upcoming M4 iMac update.
A significant process shrink might help with engineering costs, they’d have to allow 4 thunderbolt ports on an m4 pro mac.

Seems more likely that they’d stick with adding m4 pro to the mini lineup to replace the existing SKU rather than create a whole new one.
 

weaztek

macrumors 6502
Aug 28, 2009
416
225
Madison
If Apple decided to bring the M4 Pro CPU forward in enough quantities to make it available in a top SKU Mac mini it might be feasible if they deemed it important enough for a WWDC launch - for developers for example as Apple prioritise AI development.
Gosh, if they do introduce an M4 Pro Mini soon, what specs would they have to put on the next Mac Studio to keep it selling?
 

icemantx

macrumors 6502a
Mar 16, 2009
518
574
I for one would love for the Mac mini and Mac Studio to make a baby and put accessible ports on the front on the mini. It’s not like the case of the mini does not have the room.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.