What to get?
If the G5 is out of the picture, try for a G4 Dual 1-GHz through 1.42 (good luck, cause they are rare now). The "duals" are not that much more expensive than "singles" and they rock. I love mine. Just be careful of the noisy 1.25 MDDs out there.
Obsolesence is relative.
My Dual 1-GHz is as much machine as I will ever need to use in the practice of law - MS Office, Adobe Photoshop, iMovie, iDVD, iTunes, iPhoto, Keynote, etc. all run just fine on what I have.
I will be keeping it for a long long time.
But, DV editing in Final Cut Pro pushes the rendering limits of the best G4 machines.
HISTORY -
A Mac LC (68030 Motorola chip at about 16 MHz) was my first Mac in about 1990. I left Unisys / Burroughs equipment because a 286 > 386 Intel chip upgrade (not PC) was going to cost me about $14,000. Instead, I got the MacLC, a 12" color monitor (my first color with WYSIWYG) and a great 300 dpi Apple LaserWriter printer, with lots of software for under $3,000...including all the Adobe Type fonts I ever dreamed of. I was in heaven, especially a year later when I paid a little over $1,000 for a GIGANTICALLY large NEC 16" CRT monitor. I could finally see the small type in my contracts!
The LC still runs, and can be used to do lots of chores well. But it is incredibly obsolete. It won't run OS 9. Forget OS X.
In fact, the subsequently purchased G3 Platinum desktop is really inadequate for OS X, so I haven't bothered to take it beyond 9.2.2. It works and does much more than the LC ever dreamed of. I had to add a PCI card to get USB.
G3 - obsolete? Totally.
Are G4 1GHz plus machines valuable, useful? Absolutely!
Are they "obsolete"?
Realistically, YES.
Practicably, well...not exactly yet.
But 6 months after the combination of
Panther OS X 10.3 (64-bit optomized) and
G5 (64-bit chip IBM PPC 970 machines)
which become relevant upon significant sales of new machines,
G4 will be rendered just as obsolete as my LC with Motorola 68030 chip became upon introduction of
IBM PPC 604 chips into the Macintosh line, eventually evolving into G3 and G4 with OS 8 and beyond.
When considering obsolesence, think about
1990 LC = 16 MHz Motorola 68030
2003 G5 = 2,000 MHz IBM PPC 970 with AltiVec technology
1990 LC = 20 MB hard drive (and ever so sloooooow)
2003 G5 = 120 GB hard drive (9.5 ns seek) that's: 120,000 MB
1978 - 15 MB Winchester Hard Drive cost $15,000
which is why we used floppy discs at a buck each.
Straphound -
consider your budget,
pick your moment, and
get the best product you can afford at the time...within reason.
Until you are sure what that is, wait until you know when the moment is right for you.
Just don't procastinate over STATS on the next Mac build promised by Apple, because my friend, today Steve Jobs and the fruit company are not just planning for the next 2 months or 2 years, they have to think 4 and 5 years ahead.
There are always things their designers and engineers would LIKE to put in Apple's next computer build, and eventually they will, but market forces, supply & demand, dictate the affordability and marketability of each Mac.
Regardless, this inter chip rivalry of the computer giants
(IBM, Intel, Motorola, AMD, Apple, Dell, Gateway, etc.)
will continue to make our toys better and cheaper
until the machines take over and we all need protection from some robotic terminator. Arnold, HELP!
Plus, whether you buy a single or a dual 1GHz G4 is probably far less important than getting a SuperDrive so you can burn DVD discs at only $3 a pop, instead of antiquated Combo Drive that just burns CD-R/RW discs. Recently, I realized I could and SHOULD backup all the DATA that I needed to protect by burning one 4.7GB DVD-RW disc instead of a bunch of 700MB CD discs.
Just my USER files alone are getting to be multi-GIG now. It's scarry.
Take a byte out of an old Macintosh and enjoy a delicious Apple to the core.
Let us all know WHEN you byte, and WHAT Apple you picked off WHICH tree?