I was wondering why people are still using leopard on there core 2 duo macs when they can easily upgrade to a newer OS whats so great about leopard, and whats the differences between leopard and snow leopard?
Last edited:
Who says Snow Leopard or Lion is "a better OS"? There's no need to upgrade to a different OS version unless that version provides something needed that the current version doesn't provide. I see nothing in SL or Lion that I need that Leopard doesn't already provide. And what difference does it make what choices others may make? Just use whatever OS version you want and ignore what everyone else chooses to do.I would like to know why people are still using leopard on there core 2 duo macs when they can easily upgrade to a better OS whats so great about leopard, and whats the differences between leopard and snow leopard?
Because they want too - pure and simple.I was wondering why people are still using leopard on there core 2 duo macs
I'm sure there are a few who are dissuaded from upgrading because of the cost, but that's clearly not the issue for many, especially with such a trivial amount. Leopard is a secure OS that does everything that many people need. Unless there's some feature in SL or Lion that they specifically want or need, there's simply no need to upgrade for the sake of upgrading.For some people, saving $30 is far more important than having a secure, supported OS.
Leopard has not gotten security updates for over six months now. It has numerous known, acknowledged, and unpatched vulnerabilities in Safari, OS X's text handling, OS X's media playback, and many other functions. It also trusts several security certificates that are known to have been stolen.Leopard is a secure OS
Leopard requires only 384 MB RAM for "normal" tasks (at least in my VM; only more for the installation (512 MB?)). It is pretty fast (boots via EFI, not via BIOS), has a x86_64 kernel, supports all 64-Bit third party kernel extensions, which i do not want to use on a real machine (possible kernel panics), supports encrypted virtual memory, and so on. I would use it on PowerPC G4/G5 hardware, because it is the first and last OS, which supports PowerPCs and Time Machine. Many PowerPC G4/G5 users here on MR like 10.5.8 (with all additional updates), because it is very fast and stable.I was wondering why people are still using leopard on there core 2 duo macs when they can easily upgrade to a newer OS whats so great about leopard, and whats the differences between leopard and snow leopard?
There are vulnerabilities in every OS, including SL and Lion. Just because you close some in an upgraded version doesn't mean the new version is not at risk from others. There is no completely secure OS. Also, the fact that a vulnerability exists doesn't mean it will be exploited. Many vulnerabilities, both patched and unpatched, have never been exploited. If someone upgrades to SL or Lion because they think by doing so that they no longer have to employ safe computing practices, then they're upgrading for the wrong reason.Leopard has not gotten security updates for over six months now. It has numerous known, acknowledged, and unpatched vulnerabilities in Safari, OS X's text handling, OS X's media playback, and many other functions. It also trusts several security certificates that are known to have been stolen.
If you're using Leopard, you're trusting your obscurity to protect you. Fortunately, Leopard is pretty obscure now.
Ouch! That hurts! ;-)For some people, saving $30 is far more important than having a secure, supported OS.
A lot.What can you say?
Correct. ;-)Some people have very, very different priorities.
And your motivation to post such *YouKnowWhat* is? Many people do not use Leopard for the network access (in a lab, for example). Many Leopard users use File Vault, other encrypted disk images or PGPdisk Whole Disk Encryption. + Leopard supports encrypted virtual memory. Leopard is pretty secure, if you use it in the right environment. Espionage professionals find always a way, even on OSs with all official security updates.Leopard has not gotten security updates for over six months now. It has numerous known, acknowledged, and unpatched vulnerabilities in Safari, OS X's text handling, OS X's media playback, and many other functions. It also trusts several security certificates that are known to have been stolen.
If you're using Leopard, you're trusting your obscurity to protect you. Fortunately, Leopard is pretty obscure now.
Correct & +1. ;-)If someone upgrades to SL or Lion because they think by doing so that they no longer have to employ safe computing practices, then they're upgrading for the wrong reason.
It's a devil-you-do vs. devil-you-don't situation.There are vulnerabilities in every OS, including SL and Lion. Just because you close some in an upgraded version doesn't mean the new version is not at risk from others.
No, but there sure are a lot of straw men in here!There is no completely secure OS.
Well, it's pretty hard for a patched vulnerability to be exploited. And as I said, Leopard is a pretty tiny portion of a minority OS, so it's a very small target to hit.Also, the fact that a vulnerability exists doesn't mean it will be exploited. Many vulnerabilities, both patched and unpatched, have never been exploited.
Again with the straw men. Nobody said that having a patched OS was the only thing you had to do. Only that is the first step.If someone upgrades to SL or Lion because they think by doing so that they no longer have to employ safe computing practices, then they're upgrading for the wrong reason.
To inform the dangerously ignorant. To wit:And your motivation to post such *YouKnowWhat* is?
Neither of which is of any protection whatsoever against the myriad of code execution vulnerabilities that Leopard has.Many Leopard users use File Vault, other encrypted disk images or PGPdisk Whole Disk Encryption. + Leopard supports encrypted virtual memory.
Leopard is pretty insecure, from a technical standpoint. Operationally, it can be used securely...so long as you strictly limit how it is used. The vast, vast majority of people won't do that; they simply don't have the skills and understanding necessary.Leopard is pretty secure, if you use it in the right environment.
What is your intent here? Do you really think you're going to convince people to abandon Leopard and upgrade, just because you think a newer version is safer? You haven't presented one justification for upgrading. Many of the vulnerabilities that exist in any OS will likely never be exploited. Many are discovered and patched before anyone exploits them. That's what I meant about patched vulnerabilities. They were never exploited, even before they were patched.It's a devil-you-do vs. devil-you-don't situation.
What is your intent here? Do you really think you're going to convince people to abandon Leopard and upgrade, just because you think a newer version is safer? You haven't presented one justification for upgrading. Many of the vulnerabilities that exist in any OS will likely never be exploited. Many are discovered and patched before anyone exploits them. That's what I meant about patched vulnerabilities. They were never exploited, even before they were patched.
I've run Leopard for 4 years and have had exactly zero vulnerabilities exploited. Zero malware. Zero compromises. Zero crashes. Zero kernel panics. Zero re-installs. Millions of others have had the same experience. Just because a newer OS is released doesn't mean it's always better. There are disadvantages to upgrading to consider. Each person has to weigh the advantages and disadvantages and make a choice that best meets their needs.
I have no interest in trying to convince people to stay on Leopard or Tiger or any OS. Neither do I have an interest in trying to sell them on the idea of upgrading. There is no "right" or "wrong" choice here. What matters is what works best for each user.
My system cannot be compromised simply by visiting a website.I don't lose a cent if you happen to visit the wrong site and get compromised.
I'm happy for you. Mine can't, either, at least not in any way that I know.My system cannot be compromised simply by visiting a website.
Thank you for that informative contribution to this thread.
I could compile the same kind of "if" scenarios for Snow Leopard and Lion and Mountain Lion and any other OS out there. What's the point? It's not gonna happen.Note that that's a long list of ifs, all of which would have to happen, for this to work, but it is possible under Leopard just by exploiting known holes.
But you'd be making them up, or they'd rely on "user deliberately gives password out" stupidity.I could compile the same kind of "if" scenarios for Snow Leopard and Lion and Mountain Lion
It can, and does, but it won't happen to you or me, so who cares?What's the point? It's not gonna happen.